Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Gunpowder Empires DBQ 2

Satisfactory Essays
370 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gunpowder Empires DBQ 2
Gunpowder Empires DBQ Before the 1700s, three of the major empires were called the Gunpowder Empires: the Ottomans of Turkey, the Safavids of Iran, and the Mughals of India. Although the Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Empires had strong bureaucracies and economic prosperity, they also had absolute rulers who denied their citizens basic civil rights. One of the strengths of the Gunpowder Empires was their strong bureaucracies based on meritocracy. Jahangir, a Mughal Emperor, stated that “where I found sufficient merit, I conferred an advance of rank,” showing that bureaucrats in his empire had to earn their positions. (Doc. 1) The ambassador of the Holy Roman Emperor praised the Ottoman Empire for giving positions to worthy individuals instead of giving positions due to birth like the Europeans did. (Doc. 2) Another strength was the economic prosperity of these empires. Eskandar Beg, advisor to Abbas I of the Safavid Empire, mentions that the total tax revenue for one month amounted to “some twenty thousand toman,” inferring that it was a generous amount given to charity for the month of Ramadan. (Doc 4) In the Mughal Empire, governors were directed to establish hospitals in every large city at the government’s expense. (Doc 1) However, the Gunpowder Empires were ruled by absolute dictators who allowed their citizens very few freedoms and rights. Francois Bernier, a French traveler, points out that the leaders were “cruel and oppressive” and there were no governmental or legal checks to restrain the whims of these leaders. (Doc 3) Bernier would have emphasized the Ottoman rulers’ oppressive behavior in order to make his absolute monarch, King Louis XIV, look better. In Jahangir’s document, he consistently uses “I” concerning the achievements of the empire, showing that he had absolute control over everything that happened. (Doc 1) An additional document that would have helped determine the strengths and weaknesses of the Gunpowder Empires would be a painting of the Ottoman Emperor in his palace to show the splendor and wealth of the empire during its peak. The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal Empires were controlled by absolute rulers who gave their citizens few rights; however, they did create strong bureaucracies and prosperous empires that affected the development of the governments that followed them.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Sail al-Din began a militant campaign to purify and reform Islam and spread Muslim teachings among the Turkic tribes and the region.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Angevin Empire Dbq

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A) Hollister, C. Warren , Keefe, Thomas K., 1973 “ THE MAKING OF THE ANGEVIN EMPIRE” Journal of British Studies .Vol. 12, No. 2 (May, 1973), pp. 1-25 Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of The North American Conference on British Studies…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roaring 20's Dbq

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Directions: The following question requires you to construct a coherent essay that integrates your interpretation of Documents A-I and your knowledge of the period referred to in the question. High scores will be earned only by essays that both cite key pieces of evidence from the documents and draw on outside knowledge of the period. Some of the documents have been edited, and wording and punctuation have been modernized.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Classical Empires Dbq

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Based on the following documents, discuss classical empires. What types of additional documentation would help determine the benefits and difficulties of running classical empires?…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I. The Han (of China) and the Gupta (of India) were both empires that used various techniques of imperial administration to make their empires succeed. Although the Han Empire and Gupta Empire share their receiving of rewards for temporarily succeeding, antagonisms among their states, and their failure, they differ in their state-level government, types of adequate military resources, and their specific revolutions that toppled their empires.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term Gunpowder Empire refers to the military exploits of the Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal Empires in the 16-17th century when these three empires flourished. Previously, the strength of their armies relied on well trained, horse mounted soldiers. During the 17 century, this changed to a new military resource of gunpowder and weapons. Large canons could destroy fortresses and walled cities and armed soldiers could use small handguns to shot and kill the opposition who had no gunpowder weapons.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Barbarian Empire Dbq

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the year 476, the last Roman emperor was deposed. Over the previous two centuries, Barbarian invasions had brought the once-mighty Rome to its knees, and this is taken as the final fall of the Roman Empire in Western Europe. What are the political, economical and social implications of this event, and to what extent does it constitute a true turning-point in history?…

    • 2362 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gunpowder Empires

    • 1376 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The gunpowder empires include Mughal, Qing, Tokugawa, and Russia. Their rulers such as Babar in Mongrel, Aisin Gyro, Tokugawa Lucia, and Peter the great in Russia.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dark Ages Dbq

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Dark Ages were a time period involving the low point in the Middle Ages. These ages were a time of chaos and a decline in everything or having no stability of the resources or the economy in the Europe. The Dark Ages reflect hardships such as rage from raiders who wreaked havoc on the fields and a decline in control during this period. “They burned… violence of anarchy…” Frantz Funck Brentano a historian asserts the shoddy times in the ninth and tenth centuries in Europe. Brentano describes this atrocious time period by depicting the burning of churches, raids, and a dwindle in trade. Due to the decline in the economy, a chaos in architecture, and thievery this caused people to be poor and lose all possessions. Anglo-Saxon then writes,…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning from when Sargon I of Akkad built the worlds first empire, many empires have since then been established and now hold a name that are both as eminent and momentous. Two of these such empire are the Spanish and the Ottoman Empires, which began to establish and expand around the time of 1450-1800. Although separate and located in different parts of the world, the Ottoman and Spanish Empires share many similarities, as well as many differences in their empire building process.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire had originated from the Turkic nomadic groups. The governments of all three kingdoms were Muslim-based. However the Ottoman and Mughal empires were Sunni-based, while the Safavid Empire espoused Shi’ism, different forms of the Muslim religion. These kingdoms were all ruled by absolute monarchs, and also had revenues from taxation on the agrarian people. The peoples who lived in these kingdoms that were not Muslims did not have to follow the Muslim laws. All three kingdoms were also multi-linguistic and practiced inward orientation. Also, they were military based and had superior cavalries. The Mughal and Safavid empires, however, lacked a navy. The Ottoman and Safavid empires had a mixed society, as in the Mughal Empire, the society was mainly inhabited by populations of Hindus. These empires were known as the “Gunpowder Empires.” There were called this because of their use of muskets, cannons, and other types of guns in their military conquests.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Directions: The following question requires you to construct an essay that integrates your interpretation of Documents A-J and your knowledge of the period referred to in the question. In the essay you should strive to support your assertions both by citing key pieces of evidence from the documents and by drawing on your knowledge of the period.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Western Civilization Beyond Borders the answer can be attributed to the fact that these three empires shared these three aspects, “…ruthless soldiers, innovative administrations and brutal conquers….”( Noble, et el, pg. 3) These three qualities where incredibly important because: 1.) Strong Armies, aided in not only defending the…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comp Public Admin

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first ample suggestion for a representative bureaucracy was presented by J. Donald Kingsley (1944) in his analysis of the English Civil Service. Drawing from Jacksonian ideals and Marxian analysis, Kingsley did not suggest the need for a bureaucracy which was broadly representative of society but rather claimed, "Administrative arrangements always reflect the character of the social structure of a nation," that is, bureaucracy represents the dominant class in society. It was also noted that no great outcry for reform emerged because the bureaucracy was representative of the powerful in society. One of Kingsley’s main assumptions is that of the social class being the most important demographic variable, as a result those within the executive and administrative class who graduated were assured positions from the clerical to the executive class. It can then be said that the system was based on meritocracy which is a system used to bring about equality and representativeness, however, not all citizens will be educated due various reasons such as finances, hence reducing the representativeness of the system.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays