Preview

Gun Control

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control
"Would More Stringent Gun Control Laws Save Lives?"
BCOM 275

"Would More Stringent Gun Control Laws Save Lives?"
I. Introduction

A. Background information

1. Chicago has the strongest gun control regime in the nation. Chicago had over 500 murders in 2012 and are on pace to surpass that in 2013.

2. Handgun crime in the United Kingdom rose by 40% in the two years after the U.K. passed its gun ban in 1997. (BBC).

3. Washington, D.C. Implemented a gun ban in 1976. After the gun ban was instituted the city ranked first or second in murder rate for 15 years (Levy, 2008).

4. The 2nd Amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

B. Thesis Statement:

The debate is “Would more stringent gun controls save lives”? The pro argument is that gun control will save lives. The con argument is, gun controls will not save lives. Evaluations of ethical, moral, statistical, and legal issues are identified in relation to gun controls. The team presents the audience with arguments for both sides. The arguments are established to inform the audience of gun control and allow them to make an educated decision on choosing which argument to side with.

II. Con argument of debate.
A. Owning or not owning a gun will not make you less susceptible to experiencing crime.

1. In 2010, in four counties, 444 domestic homicides relating to guns were recorded. In only 8 of these instances, the gun involved had been kept in the home (Lott, pg. 25, 2010)

2. Guns in the wrong hands are dangerous, but in the right hands they are used for protection and deterrence. According to the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, Georgia 's homicide rate dropped 21% after making it easier to get guns, whereas Wisconsin 's rate went up 33% during the same time period after making it more



References: Brady Campaign. (2011, April). Bady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Retrieved from http://www.bradycampaign.org/ OK, Let 's Debate Gun Control! Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444025204577544881193377296.html. Levy, R. A. (2008, Winter). Doctors for Gun Control. Regulation, 31(4), 7-9. Lott, J. R. (2010). More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun-control laws. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. National Rifle Association. (2011,April). Villence Policy Center. Retrieved from http://www.nra.org/home.aspx Should civilian possession of handguns and other non-hunting guns be banned or severely restricted?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    As mentioned earlier, Washington, D.C. and the United Kingdom adopted stringent gun control laws and it literally increased crime. If laws become too tough to handle, people will work their way around the laws. Owning or not owning a gun will not make people less susceptible to experiencing crime. In 2010, across four counties, 444 domestic homicides relating to guns were recorded. In only eight of these instances, the gun involved had been kept in the home. Furthermore, the instances when the gun in the home had been used, it is safe to say that it was used in self-defense. Most homicide victims are killed by weapons carried by the intruder (Lott, pg. 26,…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chicago is a city that has enforced very strict gun laws in order to lessen crime rates. However, despite all their limits and restrictions, Chicago has a high number of gun-related crimes.As a matter of fact, according to Chicago Police, 20% of the 1375 guns retrieved from criminal activities from 2008 to 2012 were purchased from a single shop called Chuck’s Gun Shop, just a few miles away from the city in the village of Riverdale, Illinois. This shows that despite all the strict gun laws in Chicago, criminals are still able to find a way to retrieve firearms through neighboring cities and states to commit their crimes. It illustrates how stricter gun laws must be enforced throughout the entire nation to ensure that criminals will not be able…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every day, dozens or even hundreds of people find themselves victims of gun violence. 30,000 people on average are killed each year by firearms while 64% of all firearm deaths are suicides, and firearms are the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide. ("Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence," May 11, 2015). With those statistics, it would make sense why people think that gun control is the answer, and some regulations like background checks and increased penalties for those convicted of using guns in crimes are needed.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Philosophy

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The view on this paper will be from a pro-gun stand point providing valid points of view from the individual’s right to own guns to protect themselves and how instilling strict gun laws actually do not lessen gun crimes as anti-gun advocates proclaim.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Only through the blatant abrogation of explicit constitutional rights is gun control even possible. It must be enforced with such violations of individual rights as intrusive search and seizure and the most severely victimizes those who most need weapons for self-defense. With various gun control proposals on different agendas with the including of licensing, waiting periods, and bans on “Saturday night specials” are of little or if any value as crime-fighting measures because with the banning of guns to reduce crime makes more logic as banning alcohol to reduce drunk driving and with the persuasive evidence shows that civilian gun ownership can be a powerful deterrent to…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, when have criminals been a type of people to abide by the law; by definition a criminal is one who will break the law. Statistics support this assertion, 37.4% of prison inmates who used, carried, or possessed a firearm when they committed the crime for which they were serving their prison sentence obtained the gun from a family member or friend (Planty, Truman 2013). Furthermore, to advocate for gun control is also to advocate removing firearms from law abiding civilians, who could need weapons for self-defense, which happens about 2.5 Million times a year (NRA, 2014). Likewise, a survey of convicted felons found that 48% admitted that they avoided committing crimes when they knew the victim was armed (Write, Rossi, 1985). This evidence further supports the view-point that criminals are less likely to endanger themselves when committing crimes, therefore, citizens should be armed. Policies should not remove the most basic right to self protection in dire…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, gun control doesn’t deter crime. A November 26, 2013 study found that between 1980 and 2009 “assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level” and “states with restriction on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders”(www.gun-control.procon.org). Weapons didn’t stop crimes or murders, and that states with restrictions on concealed carry weapons had even more crime than…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" NRA (2005). Gun rights groups, such as the NRA, argue that gun control will infringe on law-abiding citizens…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith, H. & Richie, R. (2012). Why America can 't pass gun control. The Atlantic.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns are rarely used in self-defense. In 2010, for every “justifiable homicide”, there were 36 criminals ones. It is proven that the simple presence of a firearm makes any violent dispute more likely to become fatale. A woman is 500% more likely to be murdered in a domestic dispute if a gun is present. The equation is simple: more gun = more…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adams, Bob. “Gun Control Debate.” QC Researcher 12 Nov. 2004: 949-72 Web Feb 19, 2014.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Ethics

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages

    7. Bloomberg, Michael R. Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy with Evidence and Analysis. N.p.: Johns Hopkins UP, 2013. Print.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control Since the days of the pioneers of the United States, firearms have been part of the American tradition as protection and a means of hunting or sport. As we near the end of the 20th century the use of guns has changed significantly. Because of fast and steady increase in crime and the fight for the right to own a hand gun, the introduction of legislation for gun control, to try to reduce the crime in the United States, has been a hotly debated issue in recent years. Although many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people, given in the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of guns and gun owners is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. Many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people given in the second amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and registered for the American public there is a threat to the personal safety of American families everywhere. However controlling the sale and distribution of firearms is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns. In 1988 there were 9000 handgun related murders in America. Metropolitan centers and some suburban communities of America are setting new records for homicides by handguns. Larger Metropolitan centers have ten times the murder rate of all Western Europe. For example in Washington,D.C. there was an estimated 400 homicides including guns. In addition gun control has been seen as necessary because of the violence…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Debate

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Proponents of gun control believe that stronger laws can prevent the needless loss of life. Even individuals who support gun rights acknowledge that certain people should not be permitted to own guns. Current gun control laws prevent criminals, mentally ill individuals and children from owning guns. Unfortunately, there have been instances where young people and deranged gunmen have acquired weapons and used them to commit mass murders. Law reviews from the 1970s cite America’s high rate of gun-related crimes compared to other industrial countries as a driving factor behind gun control legislation. Statistics like this prompted New York City to successfully reduce its crime rates by putting gun control laws into action.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays