Preview

Guilty or Not Guilty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guilty or Not Guilty
Guilty or Not Guilty?
By: Michael Warren

In the retelling of his trial by his associate, entitled The Apology, Socrates claims in his defence that he only wishes to do good for Athens. Socrates is eventually found guilty for his actions and put on trial, which results in him being given the death sentence. For years now people have debated whether or not Socrates was guilty or not guilty, or if he is even trying to win the trial at all. Socrates was innocent of the accusations that Meletus against him, by showing he does in fact believe in gods of some sort, distancing himself from sophists, and proving he is not corrupting the youth. From the above points, Socrates is able to prove that he is not guilty, but in The Apology, the jury decided otherwise.

Socrates first addressed himself to the accusation that he “inquires into things below the earth and in the sky” (Apology 19b). He tries to provide physical explanations for matters that are normally considered to be the workings of god. From there, he addresses the accusation that he does not believe in gods endorsed by the state, but that he is introducing strange gods to the youth, not the gods of Athens. Under Socrates’ questioning, Meletus assets that Socrates believes in no gods at all, and from that point, Socrates replies that Meletus is confusing him with Anaxagoras, a well-known Pre-Socratic, whose theories Meletus is ascribing to Socrates. To prove Meletus wrong, Socrates undertakes the task of showing that he must believe in gods of some sort. He suggests that it would be impossible to believe in human matters without believed in human beings, or in musical matters without believing in musicians, and so it much be impossible to believe in supernatural matters without believing in supernatural things. But the testimony Meletus drew up against Socrates, and teaches others to believe in supernatural matters. Socrates goes on how it was the gods who gave him the task of philosophy in order to wake

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In The Apology by Plato, the accusations that was brought against Socrates during his trial, that he was worshipping new gods, corrupting the young. Even after providing services to the Athens he was being executed by the Athens for influencing young men not to join the Athens. Socrates is one of the few individuals whom one could say has so-shaped the cultural and intellectual development of the world that, without him Socrates had influenced Plato to not to have a career in the political world as an Athens Socrates. Plato was a disciple of Socrates. The apology was an attempt to defend the character of Socrates by showing him in an honest and sympathetic. Plato wanted to preserve Socrates reputation, and to him as a great mentor.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s The Apology, Socrates generates this speech at the trial where he is accused by Meletus of not believing in the gods that the city believes in, but believing in other spiritual things as he corrupts the youth with these ideas. He, then, attempts to defend and find the truth about these accusations. Socrates presents a sequence of questions for Meletus to answer, but aren’t; these questions showed the significant discrepancy in Meletus’ claim. As Socrates continues, it’s obvious how ridiculous Meletus’ sounds, as these statements are false. Socrates uses many statements that shows the contradiction in Meletus’ allegations towards him.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology by Plato

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For the majority of his life, Socrates spent a good deal of his time asking questions of the people of Athens. His goal was to arrive at a set of political and ethical truths. Contrary to many people at the time, Socrates did not lecture about the things he knew; he actually claimed to be rather ignorant. He claimed he was wise only because he recognized his ignorance and did not claim to know what he did not know (Grube 26). The questions Socrates asked forced his audiences to think through a problem and arrive at a logical conclusion. At times, the answers seemed so obvious his opponents often looked foolish. His “Socratic Method” of questioning as it came to be called later, was adored by Socrates’ followers but despised by others throughout Athens (“Socrates Biography.”).…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socartes

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For me, Socrates’ defense against the charge that he doesn’t believe in God’s is fairly sufficient. He admits to not believing in the God’s of Athens, but does assert that he lives his life by the words of some sort of higher being, or spirits. As he mentions, “I live in great poverty because of my service to God” (23c). I agree with his argument when he says that claiming he is an atheist is completely false, considering he does believe in higher power spiritual beings.Though Socrates did not believe in the same God as the Athenian people, i see no way of charging him for this offense. He does nothing wrong or unjust, and even goes as far as to say that in the end he knows nothing. I feel like the Athenian court system took this law far too literally and therefore on their literal translation of the law were able to charge Socrates.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apology Paper

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Apology by Plato, the scene is set up on the jury; Socrates is standing in front of his accusers, Meletus, Lycon and Anytus. He is defending for himself against the four charges brought by the accusers. Socrates is charged with inquiring the heaven and searching things beneath the earth, a Sophist, not believing the god of Athens, and corrupting the youth. Therefore, surrounding him was a group of wealthy young audiences. In the Apology, Socrates is defending for himself as well as prophesies to those who condemned him. Although Socrates died, but he never convicted of his charges; even at the last moment, he warns the condemners and accusers will soon be punished by his son. In my opinion, if I were on the jury, I would also find Socrates as not guilty. Socrates violates none of the four charges, and by his eloquence, he embarrassed his accuser in front of the public, especially the wealthy young group of people and leading the defense on the jury and trap the accuser.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the passage The Apology, Socrates was brought to trial on the charges of believing in false gods and corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates responds to the charges brought against him by beginning to cross examine Meletus. He wants Meletus to explain exactly what a good influence is and how is Socrates a bad influence on the youth. Meletus explains that councilmen and laws make a good influence on the youth. He also states that if he is harming the youth it would of been done unintentionally, which therefore would causes Meletus accusation to be a lie. Socrates believes that harming someone else would come back eventually to harm himself , so any sane man would never want to bring harm to themselves, so it's not possible for his accusation be valid. He was never was anyone's…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived during a time that gods did not create the world but were created by man. The people during his era had to worship, sacrifice their lives, and honor them with praises because they were afraid of the gods. As a matter of fact, they…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous charges against Socrates in the reading of The Apology. The basic charges against him include impiety, corrupting the youth, and theorizing about unknown topics. He does not believe in the gods that the state does, and therefore seeks for natural explanations to processes that occur in the world around him. He did not recognize the gods and introduced other new divinities. Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth. Due to the constant asking of questions and inquiry, it lead him to try to discover new things about life. Since he looked for natural reason, he began to teach others about his understandings. His followers soon began to imitate his methods and expose other people as unwise which was a threat to the order…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Apology Analysis

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher, mathematician, and pupil of the philosopher Socrates, relays his interpretation of Socrates’ defence against the Athenian council in, An Excerpt from Plato’s Apology. In the writings, (which may be biased being as Plato was an admirer of Socrates), Socrates attempts to dispel the charges laid against him. Throughout the excerpt, there is much acknowledgement surronding the scuttlebut in cirulation emcompassing Socrates, why and how he earned he vile names, his everlasting support of philosophical studies, and the importance of finding and improving the sole. All developing the thesis of Socrates’ attempt to prove that he is not a conceited, boastful philosopher but in reality there is a method to his madness.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates first addressed the old accusations, which he described as prejudices implanted in the minds of the jurors, by many, when the jurors were quite young. Believing that it would be more difficult to remove such prejudices, Socrates first attempted to refute the old preconceived ideas about him (18b-e). In early societies, such as Athens, people made sense of the world and themselves in terms of the gods and by telling stories about the gods. In this case, the gods were viewed as the powers that fashioned and ruled the world. Various Greek philosophers attempted to make sense of the world in terms of various elements and ‘mechanical’ principles. Philosophy, thus, was perceived as arising in opposition to traditional religious beliefs. However, Socrates disproves these accusations by claiming he, in fact, has no interest in how the earth is made, nor does he hold any expertise in this particular topic (19d). Socrates also dismisses the accusation of teaching others these things by asserting he is not a teacher (19e). In Athens, only the wealthy could afford teachers, making teachers very rich during this time period. However, Socrates asks his…

    • 1073 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates viewpoint about remaining in jail and being executed is all based on the idea that if he breaks out of jail he would be unjust, and just in general goes against his beliefs. “ Socrates wants to abide by the law because he respected the city as well as the laws that governed Athens. Living by such laws allowed Socrates to lead what he perceived to be the just life, therefore the good life. For Socrates “it is never right to commit injustice or return injustice to defend one self against injury by retaliation. “ “ Then we ought not to retaliate or render evil for evil to anyone, whatever evil we may have suffered from him.” If Socrates would to escape, then it would be breaking the law. Even if he felt that the jury was wrong for convicting him, his intention is not to return a wrong for another wrong. Socrates can’t escape if he thinks that doing that action is unjust, he has personal principles which is that just action is the right action and going against that principle would be unjust. To do an unjust action ruins one soul and life isn’t worth living with a ruined soul. Socrates believed that there was no point in living, if his life was not moral and just. To him quality of his life is more important than the quantity of it. In addition, Athens protects him with right and laws and he feels that in return he has to obey them by being just.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apology from Socrates

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Apology From Socrates' The Apology is Socrates' defense at his trial. As the dialogue begins, Socrates notes that his accusers have cautioned the jury against Socrates’ eloquence, according to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates speaks the truth. Socrates distinguished two groups of accusers: the earlier and the later accusers. The earlier group is the hardest to defend against, since they do not appear in court. He is all so accused of being a Sophist: that he is a teacher and takes money for his teaching. He attempts to explain why he has attracted such a reputation. The oracle was asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates was. The answer was no, there was no man wiser. Socrates cannot believe this oracle, so he sets out to disprove it by finding someone who is wiser. He goes to a politician, who is thought wise by him self and others. Socrates does not think this man to be wise and tells him so. As a consequence, the politician hated Socrates, as…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato's The Apology is an account of the speech. Socrates makes at the trial in which he is charged with not recognizing the gods recognized by the state, inventing new gods, and corrupting the youth of Athens. For the most part, Socrates speaks in a very plain, conversational manner. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed with honesty and directness. Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for bringing Socrates before the jury. He strongly attacks Meletus for wasting the court¡¦s time on such absurd charges. He then argues that if he corrupted the young he did so unknowingly since Socrates believes that one never deliberately acts wrongly. If Socrates neither did not corrupt the young nor did so unknowingly, then in both cases he should not be brought to trial. The other charge is the charge of impiety. This is when…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates lived during a time period where the transition from the height of the Athenian empire to its decline took place. Such a decline took place at the hands of Sparta where Athenians faced defeat in the Peloponnesian war (2006). Thus this was a time period where the Athenians were recovering from the humiliating defeat from Sparta. This was also a time in culture where Greeks believed and thought of gods and goddesses as being associated with protecting particular cities. They believed that Athens was protected by the Greek goddess Athena (2006). These aspects have great significance in shaping up the death of Socrates. Because most of the teachings and beliefs of Socrates went against the belief of Athena and her godly existence, the people of Athens became quite irritated and frustrated with Socrates. The last thing they desired was to have one man in the form of Socrates questioning Athena and subjecting all Athenians to yet another painful punishment at her hands. Thus the entire false accusations were built around this aspect and Socrates was brought to trial. (2006). Even though Socrates had strong valid arguments against the accusers it all fell in deaf ears and the unfortunate, wrong verdict was brought forward declaring that Socrates is guilty and that he was to be sentenced to death by drinking a cup of hemlock. The court stated that Socrates was…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guilty or Innocent

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Imagine someone being locked up in a cell for 25 years convicted of a crime he or she did not commit. This person whom has been locked up for all these years has been telling everyone that he or she is innocent of the crime they were convicted of. Even though this person was telling everyone this, nobody believed him or her for a long- time. Until one day, someone believed that persons story. With many people in prison, others tend to overlook the fact that some of those people are wrongfully convicted; there are many reasons for this wrongful conviction. More than 350 innocent people in prison since 1989 that have been exonerated and released from prison (Eppler. 2009, Para. 3).The most common wrongful conviction is eyewitness error. Many who are wrongfully convicted some of which are very famous in history such as Dr. Rubin (Hurricane) Carter. There have been exonerations in 34 of the 50 states since the twenty-first century begun.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays