Preview

Group Development and Interaction Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1914 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Group Development and Interaction Theory
Group Development and Interaction Theory
Within the business setting, the shift from yesterday’s “singular” culture to today’s “team” culture has brought about a new era of learning, development, and innovation. However, this shift has also brought with it a certain amount of dissatisfaction, conflict, and confusion. This paper will focus on the Tuckman Theory, and discuss how Tuckman’s five stages of group development and interaction applies to the work environment and leadership effectiveness.
The Tuckman Theory
Tuckman’s theory maintains that groups enter four foreseeable and elementary stages of development, and each of these stages contain both task and maintenance functions. These stages are Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. Later, in 1977, Bruce Tuckman, in collaboration with Mary Ann Jensen, updated his model with a fifth stage called “adjourning” (Smith, 2005). To this Tuckman stated:
We reviewed 22 studies that had appeared since the original publication of the model and which we located by means of the Social Sciences Citation Index. These articles, one of which dubbed the stages the 'Tuckman hypothesis' tended to support the existence of the four stages but also suggested a fifth stage for which a perfect rhyme could not be found. We called it 'adjourning' (Tuckman 1984).

The Five Stages of Development
Forming. Forming consists of the orientation of team members, the testing of boundaries between team members, and gathering information about the task and how the team should approach it. Team members are also busy deciding on the organization of the team, roles, and schedules. During this stage, individual team members are assessing his/her acceptance among other team members as well as avoiding any controversy or conflict.
While this may be a more social and comfortable stage for team members, not much work is accomplished because of the members’ avoidance of threat or conflict.
Storming. When important issues are beginning to be



References: Lagace, M. (2004). Working knowledge for business leaders. How team leaders show support – or not. Retrieved November 5, 2006, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/4155.html. Mackintosh, A. (2003). The Coaching Manager. Stages of team development. Retrieved November 2, 2006, from http://www.performance-am.com/coaching_models.htm. MacLeod, C. (2002). Leadership tips. 5 Stages of group development. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.gmu.edu/student/csl/5stages.html. Miami University. (2006). The leadership handout series. Retrieved November 3, 2006, from http://www.units.muohio.edu/saf/sac/handout/stages.html. Smith, M. K. (2005). Bruce W. Tuckman - Forming, storming, norming and performing in groups. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from www.infed.org/thinkers/tuckman.htm.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bruce Tuckman has a theory which contains of four stages; these are forming, storming, norming and performing. His theory is about group development. The first stage is forming, this is when a group is reliant on one particular leader, if the leader is not there and someone else tries to take charge then the confusion starts. The leader makes sure every individual is aware of their role, if the leader does not make them aware, then their roles and responsibilities are unclear. For example in a class room everyone will be speaking to each other, when the teacher comes in and tells everyone to settle down then they will do so. The second stage is storming, at this stage everyone hasn’t settled into a task, they are all busy chatting amongst their selves and deciding who should be in charge. Decisions don’t come easily within a group it takes some time to come to an agreement. You start to form your own cliques and groups. People in the group may challenge each other in order to come out on top. Being focused it top priority for every individual, concentrating on achieving their goals and not being distracted by relationships and emotional issues, to enable progress to be made you may have to compromise within the group members. The third stage is Norming, this is when all members of the group have come to agreement on their roles and have accepted their individual responsibilities. Big decisions are made amongst group agreement were as minor decisions may be given to individuals or small groups within the whole group. Within the group commitment is getting stronger and unity is made everyone has a clear picture of what is happening. Now all the problems are over fun and social activates can now take place within the group and the leader has now earned every members respect and trust. The last stage is performing, the team is more strategically aware; the team members know what they are doing and why they are doing so,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ba420: Mid-Term

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though it is still highly cited in team and group research, Tuckman’s model may be unrealistic from an organizational perspective. Research has shown that many teams experience relational conflicts at different times and in different contexts. Connie Gersick proposes that groups do not necessarily progress linearly from one step to another in a predetermined sequence but alternate between periods of inertia with little visible progress toward goal achievement.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgmt 592

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Leadership: Theory, Application, and Skill Development, chapter 1, Robert N. Lussier, Ph.D., Christopher F. Achua, D.B.A, 2007…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tuckman thought that the communication within a group can be effected by how the people should feel around each other and if these people have first met different people may have different reactions. Tuckman suggested four stages to a process groups go through.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tuckman’s Module lays out the 5 phases in team’s life – Forming- storming- norming- performing, adjourning, for each of the phases he breaks them into tasks and behaviours.…

    • 2674 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tuckman, Bruce W. and Jensen, Mary Ann C. (1977) ‘Stages of small group development revisited’. Group and Organisational studies, 2; 419-427.…

    • 6948 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Forming – Storming – Norming – Performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965, who maintained that these phases are all necessary and inevitable in order for the team to grow, to face up to…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychologist Bruce Tuckman first came up with the memorable phrase "forming, storming, norming, and performing" in his 1965 article, "Developmental Sequence in Small Groups." He used it to describe the path that most teams follow on their way to high performance.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tuckman's Stages

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1965, soon after leaving Princeton University, Bruce Tuckman developed a theory of group development that has gained a great deal of popularity. The theory contained four distinct stages and he suggested that for a group to achieve maximum effectiveness, it needed to move through all four stages (Chimaera Consulting Limited, 1999, para. 2). I found it not only to be a useful model for understanding how my work team is evolving but also for understanding what needs to happen for the most effective team results.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the forming stage: the forming of the team takes place. The members get to know one another and they exchange some personal information.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group Project

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Forming: During this stage of the team, there is a desire to be accepted and to avoid conflict; The tasks are allotted according the skills and abilities of the persons. The tendency during this stage is to study the other members and avoid confrontation. The team members get to know each other. It is planned that this…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tuckman, B. W. and Jensen, M. C., 1977. Stages of Small-Group Development Revisted. 6 (15) Accessed from: http://www.freewebs.com/group-management/BruceTuckman(1).pdf Accessed on: 23/04/15…

    • 5437 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce W. Tuckman (1938) is best known for his article ‘developmental sequence in small groups’ published in 1965, his areas of expertise are educational research and educational psychology. The model most often referenced is Tuckman’s forming-storming-norming-performing. This model does suffer some criticism due to its generalisation and not all groups are so straight forward.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Communication

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Forming is when new members of a group/team get together for the first time and feel uncomfortable. This first step is when they try to understand each other, define their tasks and also test their relationships.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuckman (1965) suggests that understanding is required in order for teams to reach maturity. Tuckman phases of team development are:…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays