Great Compromise Definition
Section 1: Please define the following terms, provide an example and discuss why the term is important to the understanding of American public policy.
Authority: The right to give orders, conclude decisions, and implement laws.
Example: Police officers, judges, etc.
Importance: Necessary for a position in a bureaucratic structure.
Power: The ability or capacity to direct the behavior of people or type of events.
Example: A person with knowledge influencing the actions of others.
Importance: Necessary to keep order and control.
Policy: a principle/procedure of action given by the government, party, business, or individual.
Example: Corporate private policies
Importance: Intended for the use of reaching explicit goals.
Hamilton: Alexander …show more content…
What are two problems of the Great Compromise according to the anti-federalists?
The Great Compromise or “Connecticut Compromise”, is the result of two plans in one. It consists of the New Jersey Plan and Virginia Plan, in order to satisfy both large and small states. The Great Compromise is made of two house legislatures, the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Senate gratifies smaller states by having a legitimate number of representatives for each state. The House of Representatives gratifies the larger states with larger populations by appointing one representative for every 30,000 citizens.
The Great Compromise seemed acceptable to the Federalists but the anti-federalists disagreed with the Great Compromise. The anti-federalists didn't like the idea of ratifying the constitution. They were convinced the new federal government would fail to protect “the people’s” rights. They also believed a strong central government in the new constitution would open doors to possibilities of a British Monarchy. Anti-federalists prefered the power to stay within the states instead of the national government.
2. How does authority differ from power according to …show more content…
They did not have an executive branch which would make laws and the states were independent. It also required nine out of thirteen states’ votes to pass laws. Lastly, there wasn't a way of settling great conflicts because they lacked a national court. In connection, Shay’s Rebellion was the result of an angry group of farmers rebelling against implemented taxes by the government. The second continental congress structured the articles in such a form to prevent the government from having a great amount of power over citizens. This would later backfire as the government didn’t have the power to end Shay’s Rebellion. Once the government had seen the Articles of confederation lacked effectiveness of governing citizens, a new government was set up where powers were
Authority: The right to give orders, conclude decisions, and implement laws.
Example: Police officers, judges, etc.
Importance: Necessary for a position in a bureaucratic structure.
Power: The ability or capacity to direct the behavior of people or type of events.
Example: A person with knowledge influencing the actions of others.
Importance: Necessary to keep order and control.
Policy: a principle/procedure of action given by the government, party, business, or individual.
Example: Corporate private policies
Importance: Intended for the use of reaching explicit goals.
Hamilton: Alexander …show more content…
What are two problems of the Great Compromise according to the anti-federalists?
The Great Compromise or “Connecticut Compromise”, is the result of two plans in one. It consists of the New Jersey Plan and Virginia Plan, in order to satisfy both large and small states. The Great Compromise is made of two house legislatures, the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Senate gratifies smaller states by having a legitimate number of representatives for each state. The House of Representatives gratifies the larger states with larger populations by appointing one representative for every 30,000 citizens.
The Great Compromise seemed acceptable to the Federalists but the anti-federalists disagreed with the Great Compromise. The anti-federalists didn't like the idea of ratifying the constitution. They were convinced the new federal government would fail to protect “the people’s” rights. They also believed a strong central government in the new constitution would open doors to possibilities of a British Monarchy. Anti-federalists prefered the power to stay within the states instead of the national government.
2. How does authority differ from power according to …show more content…
They did not have an executive branch which would make laws and the states were independent. It also required nine out of thirteen states’ votes to pass laws. Lastly, there wasn't a way of settling great conflicts because they lacked a national court. In connection, Shay’s Rebellion was the result of an angry group of farmers rebelling against implemented taxes by the government. The second continental congress structured the articles in such a form to prevent the government from having a great amount of power over citizens. This would later backfire as the government didn’t have the power to end Shay’s Rebellion. Once the government had seen the Articles of confederation lacked effectiveness of governing citizens, a new government was set up where powers were