Preview

Government Secrecy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Government Secrecy
Ashley Simons "Secrecy and a free, democratic government don't mix," President Harry Truman once said. Harry Truman understood the importance of an open government in a free society. Unfortunately, George W. Bush has a different outlook. From the first days of his administration, President Bush has taken steps to tighten the government's hold on information and limit public scrutiny of its activities. Expansive assertions of executive privilege, restrictive views of the Freedom of Information Act, increasing use of national security classification, stonewalling in response to congressional request for information – all these were evident even before the September 11 attacks (At Issue: Has the Bush administration misused government secrecy?). Since then the clamps on information have only tightened. The purpose of this paper is to examine some methods used by the government and to provide some explanations why the government is keeping the American public uninformed. In a democracy, representatives of the citizenry may momentarily cloak their decision-making and their policies in secrecy for the good of the nation, to protect it from the enemies and to assure its survival. However, those representatives must remember that the secrecy they impose is only momentary and that the shrouded decisions and policies they make, once made known to the citizenry, must be acceptable to them. The citizenry, in turn, accept such secrecy only in limited instances and on a momentary basis in order to have the confidence that their representatives are making decisions and policies acceptable to them. A government failing to honor these arrangements may be one not worth the cost of preservation. The federal government has a long history of making information secret. The marking of documents to indicate their protected status, confidential or secret, began as an informal practice in the early days of the federal government. It was an exercise carried over from


Bibliography: "At Issue: Has the Bush administration misused government secrecy?." CQ Researcher 15.42 (2005): 1021. Gordon Murnane, Laura. "Shhh!!: Keeping Current on Government Secrecy." Searcher 14.1 (2006): 35. "Government Secrecy Reaches Historic Levels." Information Management Journal 39.5 (2005): 14. Jenkins, Ray. "A Culture of Secrecy: The Government Versus the People 's Right to Know (review)." Journal of Interdisciplinary History 30.3 (1999): 549-51. Kennedy, Shirley Duglin. "On the Net, Off the Net." Information Today 21.10 (2004): 17. OpenTheGovernment.Org. 2006. 28 Apr. 2006 < http://www.openthegovernment.org/> Relyea, Harold. "Government secrecy: policy depths and dimensions." Government Information Quarterly 20.4 (2003): 395-418. "WHAT YOU DON 'T KNOW." Editor & Publisher 138.11 (2005): 21.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Jacob Wetterling Case

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Jacob Wetterling case is, at its core, a dispute over whether access to nonessential government files by the press, specifically investigative reports, or the privacy rights of individuals is ensured by the Constitution of the United States and without the realm of the state. The family of Jacob Wetterling, a young boy who was abducted and murdered in 1989, issued a lawsuit against the Stearns County as it prepared to release the opened state files to government watchdog groups and media coalitions as per their requests and state law. The investigation itself has been closed and a conviction issued, so the basis for the Wetterling’s lawsuit is a concern that their privacy is being violated as the files contain information they deem confidential.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pages 307 314

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page

    2. Explain the meaning of and justification for the statement, "American government is the leakiest in the world."…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the Obama Administration is concealing the true magnitude of terrorist attacks and activity in the US.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On September 11, 2001, about 3,000 people were killed, and over 6,000 people were injured in the United States. Al-Qaeda, a group of Islamic extremists, hijacked four airplanes to execute suicide attacks. Two of the compromised airliners hit the World Trade Center towers in New York City. Another plane struck the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and the last plane crashed in Pennsylvania in a field. The American people were unfortunately surprised because of those attacks; many loved ones were lost, and many terrorists escaped from our government’s reach. Because of this infamous event, the officials of the United States government have debated and are currently debating whether they, the government, should be allowed to observe and retain information…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article “Visible Man” written by Peter Singer discusses the issues that are involved with the topic of privacy. Many people feel that they are comfortable with the actions they are taking but they do not realize the information they are putting out into the real world. Singer explains how government officials use cell phone providers to gain insight on certain individuals. The idea that is stressed in this article is that too much privacy is never good, especially with government officials because the confidential information that gets leaked informs society on what it going on behind the scenes. The more information one can gather about a topic, the more informed they will be; furthermore, being well educated on a topic will allow one…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In an article, National Security Secrecy: How the Limits Change, “Steven Aftergood took on a strategy…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3.000 people were killed on that day, the single largest loss of life from a foreign attack…

    • 3964 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Privacy is Utterly Dead Peter Singer is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor at Princeton University and the University of Melbourne that studies Bioethics, Philosophy and Public Ethics. His essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” focuses on transparency and personal privacy. One can see after reading this essay, Singer is in favor of openness, but he also notes that the government misuses these technologies by having sousveillance and surveillance cameras. A person needs to understand how privacy, surveillance and sousveillance is defined to understand why he was in favor of openness.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself living in world with no social expectations, no competitions and no submission to the social hierarchy. Imagine yourself being free, peaceful, strong and powerful. Jean-Jacques Rousseau calls this state the natural state of man, the state that everyone should aspire to live in and that brings power to an individual. By exploring the natural state of man we are able to see how Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed a new understanding of the individual.…

    • 3155 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has created a false reality for America by hiding information from the citizens. “Our government teaches the whole people by its example. If the government becomes the lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” –Louis D Brandeis. When it comes to the government, America knows that there are many secrets kept away from us. These secrets may make this world better, or it may not. What is not understood, is why they have to hide things from us citizens who obey. If we do wrong, we are given jail time and we have to pay the price. Well why does the government get away with situations like this? I have come to understand that the government is keeping advances that…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All the countries establish in its political constitution and in its legislation, the duty of the government to look over the life of its citizens, protecting them from the risk: the internal threats (inside the proper country) and external (outside the country) That is why, it is admitted, and it is even required, that the government possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of dangerous forces, however lately, it has been found that in order to get information that may be useful to protect citizens , the government itself reach private information from all its citizens as well. That is why this essay aims to point out the risks this action (spying) implies for all and aims to answer thereupon,” Why government should not spy on us.”…

    • 806 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defining National Security VS Personal Privacy is a matter of looking at the basic nature of each. From research collected there is a consensus that we need balance. Too much of one hurts the other and vise versa. There are a couple of articles that range from Civil Liberties to the birth of public right to know that support the overall claim. Talks about the effects of censorship in different situations like war and peace will help prove that a balance needs to be forged. The problem here isn’t the definition of personal vs national security, but the survival of each in light of each other. There is history in our nation that explains why impinging on privacy may not be in the best interest of national security or of an individual. Also we will look at when it is appropriate for national security to impinge on personal privacy. You can’t have both without upsetting the balance of all. The claim is that too much national security will limit or demolish personal privacy. Also the same for too much personal privacy or liberty will limit or demolish security. So the question would be “does less personal privacy increase National Security?” My thesis is that too much National Security can destroy a government from the inside out by invading privacy. Democracy can’t trample on freedoms given the people for fear that a democracy no longer exists. “As Lee Strickland (2005) indicates, that ‘Civil liberties are not an obstacle; they’re a vital part of our strength. (P.1.)’” This creates a civil uprising that increases the national threat. It is human nature to inquire of forbidden practices. This is more so the case when laws designed to protect are exploited.…

    • 2438 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You Have ‘Nothing to Hide’”, published in May of 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue…

    • 2748 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prism Snowden

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages

    That the U.S. government was spying on its citizens , since 9/11, was obvious. but how far they exactly are going, became clear when Edward Snowden leaked information about the secret project of the National Security Agency, PRISM. The 29 -year-old system administrator saw shocking things during his three months at NSA, so shocking he leaked information to the British newspaper; The Guardian and fled out of the U.S.A.…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On September 11th of 2001 the United States was attacked. Many people died and through that drama the United States was unified with a singular goal of stopping terrorism. While many people were willing to sacrifice a few freedoms for the greater good, others were asking where is the line between the government fighting terrorism and abusing a situation to expand its dominion over the public. The United States government passed a bill called the PATRIOT Act to simplify procedures, relax rule sets on prosecution and give the government more jurisdiction into the personal lives of the populace by allowing surveillance techniques like roving wire taps and data mining without provocation or court order. While many officials state that this act is a crucial tool in the war on terror, others argue that it is unconstitutional and taking away the freedoms the government is supposed to protect. This difference in opinion has raised the question of how much privacy should the population be willing to give up to support the war on terror. The PATRIOT Act is walking a dangerous line and it would be irresponsible to accept it without research into the pros and cons, which are not equal. Although the act does have a few benefits, it goes too far over that line by giving the far too much power to the government while taking away too many freedoms.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays