Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Gov Project

Good Essays
1453 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gov Project
Brad Weiss
Mrs. Euziere
American Government Honors
25 August 2013

National Government Event
As President Barack Obama considers military action in response to Bashar al-Assad's alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria, a debate over whether he must seek Congress' consent has surfaced. It's a debate with which the president is extremely familiar.
As a senator, Obama was a staunch critic of President George W. Bush for not obtaining renewed authorization for the war in Iraq. He blasted his predecessor in 2007, saying, "The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
Additionally, as a candidate for president, Obama reaffirmed that sentiment. He told the Boston Globe in a questionnaire, "The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation."
"It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action," Obama added at the time.
As a senator, Vice President Joe Biden had a similar take. During a campaign speech in Iowa in 2007, he said "the consequences of war -- intended or otherwise -- can be so profound and complicated that our founding fathers vested in Congress, not the president, the power to initiate war, except to repel an imminent attack on the United States or its citizens."
Although they have held such strong views in the past, their positions have dramatically changed. They did not seek Congressional consent when the United States engaged its military in Libya, nor when Obama expanded the war in Afghanistan. In both instances, members of Congress complained loudly, but the president defended his decision.
In the case of Libya, the president said at the time that U.S. troops would not be on the ground and so the law didn't apply.
Why the change of heart?
"Where you stand on this issue depends on where you sit, and right now (Obama) is sitting in the Oval Office," said Kal Raustiala, professor of law at UCLA.
It's a long-running battle of checks and balances. And it's one that the president usually wins.
The debate revolves around the War Powers Resolution.
Congress passed the measure in 1973, overriding a veto by President Richard Nixon. It was meant to rein in the president's ability to involve the United States in overseas conflict.
The law requires that the president seek consent from Congress before force is used or within 60 days of the start of hostilities and that the president provides Congress with reports throughout the conflict.
It hasn't really worked that way.

It's a debate that has played out time and time again in U.S. history: a president is considering intervening in an international conflict, Congress wants a say. Specifically, congressional opponents want the ability to block the intended military action.
Since 1973, the United States has used military force in Grenada in 1983, Panama in 1989, Iraq in 1991, Haiti in 1994 and Kosovo in 1999. In all those instances, presidents -- both Democrats and Republicans -- sidestepped Congress and committed U.S. military forces without obtaining Congressional approval.
Congress did, however, provide Bush with its approval for the war in Iraq in 2002 and the war in Afghanistan after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.
Like a replay of the past, some members of Congress are demanding the president seek the legislative branch's approval before any action is taken in Syria. But it's highly unlikely the president will take that formal step.
Congress complains, sometimes loudly, but has rarely done anything about it. It could pass laws further restricting the president's authority, but hasn't done so. The legislative branch could also withhold funding of any military conflict, but that's another avenue it has failed to take. Additionally, the judiciary has been reluctant to settle the dispute.
In the White House's daily briefing, press secretary Jay Carney said the administration is consulting with Congress. Obama "had discussions with relevant members of Congress, and leaders of committees and leaders of the Congress at large," he said.
In response to Carney's statement, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Michigan, who called military action without congressional approval "unconstitutional" and is among a group of lawmakers who are demanding the president seek their approval, tweeted, "yeah right."
But while members are likely to write letters, pontificate and even challenge the president to seek consent, the president is likely to continue to sit on the winning side of the issue.

Obama wants to into war with Syria because they are killing their own people with chemicals. But Syria said if we go and invade them, they will take their chemicals and invade our country full force. I really don’t want to go to war with Syria because I don’t want to be in danger of them coming over here and killing us. I really don’t want to die any time soon.

State Government Event
Florida’s housing market continued its upward trend in July, as sales and prices for homes and condos rose in the year-over-year comparison and the state steadily recovers from the previous decade’s housing bust.
According to a report released Wednesday by Florida Realtors, sales of existing single-family homes rose 20.9 percent from July 2012 to 21,238 total sales, and the median sale price jumped 18.7 percent to $177,500. Condo sales increased 16.8 percent to 9,430 total sales, and the median sale price rose 21.9 percent to $128,000.
The total number of cash sales -- an indicator of investor activity in the marketplace -- increased for both condos and homes, but their share of total sales declined. Cash sales made up 70 percent of total condo sales, pointing to high investor activity but still down 2.9 percent from July 2012. The share of home sales transacted in cash was 42.5 percent, a drop of 0.3 percent from last year.
Florida Realtors heralded the numbers, saying they reveal the improving housing market and with it, the recovering economy.
“July marks the 19th consecutive month that we’ve seen the statewide single-family home median sales price increase year-over-year. Florida’s housing market is growing and that’s good news for our economy,” Florida Realtors president Dean Asher said.
There was one note of caution, however, as the reduction in the inventory of homes on the market may be easing.
“Specifically, new listings have been up, year over year, for all of 2013. This suggests that sellers are more eager to place their homes on the market. In addition, the months’ supply of inventory numbers have remained fairly static for the past three months, suggesting we may be reaching the bottom of the inventory decline,” Florida Realtors chief economist John Tuccillo said.
The Florida housing market is finally starting to go up again. This is amazing news for retailers and people who want to see their homes, but if people don’t want to sell their house, it really doesn’t affect them. It really doesn’t affect me because I don’t own a house nor will I be owning one in the near future, so it really doesn’t affect me.
Fun Event
Jay Leno brought in General Motors VP of global design Ed Welburn to his garage this week to talk about the Cadillac Elmiraj concept that was revealed in Pebble Beach. Leno and Welburn talk about their respective CTS-Vs before getting into the beast that is the Elmiraj.
Welburn says that the car is still a concept but “it gives us an opportunity to really look at something different for the brand.”
Leno remarks that the concepts of his day were fantasy projects like the bubble-top and turbine car. Elmiraj, obviously, is a little closer to production, taking cues from the new CTS.
The taillights are inspired by the Caddies of the '50s and '60s, while the proportions are classic for a big, rear-wheel-drive coupe. Welburn says there's a twin-turbocharged V8 underhood, but the wheels would probably shrink for a production version.
The two go through the interior of the mega coupe before checking out more of the sheetmetal. Unfortunately, considering this is a concept, they don't get in and tear up the PCH.
The brand new Cadillac elmiraj concept was in Jay Leno’s garage the other day. This is what Cadillac is working on right now, it’s not even available to the public! I think the elmiraj is the best caddy they have made! It looks awesome and it’s so fast, it’s ridiculous. Jay Leno is a very lucky man!

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.(Article II, section 2)…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman Vs Framer

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Congress passed the War Powers Resolution Act because of Truman’s actions in the Korean War. In 1973, after decades of debating on this issue, Congress decided to pass this legislation in order to limit the president’s war power (p.144). This legislation is in some interpretation returning to the Framers’ vision of war powers between the Congress and the Presidency. The War Powers Resolution Act makes Congress and the President collaborate with each other before sending United States troops into harms way, especially if the conflict is long term (p.144-145). Also, the War Powers Resolution Act gives the President only 90 days to notify Congress if troops were send abroad (p.145). This legislation is restoring checks and balances between the Congress and the Presidency because this legislation is giving back certain war powers to the Congress that the President took.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My initial reaction would be to side with Congress. The War Powers Resolution allows the president to engage in an act of war without the consent of congress only in the case of an attack on the United States, or by “statutory authorization”. Based on this, the legislative branch seems to be in the right in this situation. I would ask the president questions pertaining to the goals of the US forces in the region, and questions to Congress such as to their opposition to the presidents actions.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although only Congress has the right to authorise the use of the armed forces, if the president acts there is little Congress can do to restrain him.This is a power given to the President domestically, executing the power on an international scale gives the President a powerful image that asserts his/her dominance. An example would be Franklin Roosevelt. Roosevelt's four terms as president were marked by two of the largest threats to America; the Great Depression and World War II. The role President Roosevelt played during World War II showed complete dominance at an international scale, he can be seen to be one of the most influential Presidents that America has ever had. Franklin D Roosevelt was given the power to be Commander-In-Chief, as all Presidents do and had became an international figure because of…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carter quotes,” In his original veto message, President Nixon asserted that he had no choice but to reject the Resolution because it was "clearly unconstitutional.””. President Nixon has a point in which he says that he shouldn’t even be following the resolution if the constitution already provides enough power through all this. Limiting the the presidents power is not necessary one bit, the position of President wouldn’t be needed or it would just become obsolete if they didn’t have the power to perform whatever they wanted that they believed would help. Even chairman Tom Connaly disagrees,"Do you think I'll have to ask Congress for a declaration of war if I decide to send American forces into Korea?" the President asked?"If a burglar breaks into your house," I said, "you can shoot at him without going down to the police station and getting permission. . . . You have the right to do it as commander-in-chief and under the UN Charter.". [25](fed-soc.org) The point that Conally was trying to bring across is that as a president, the ability to wage in combat should be under their choice, they are the ones voted for to provide for whats best for the citizens either way.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Section 2, Article 2, “The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States” This reserves the President the right to make military decisions without the knowledge of Congress as long as Congress has approved the war.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To have the power to go beyond the constitution should be one of the president’s power when dealing with war or rebellion, and to protect the lives of US citizens or keep international peace in foreign countries. The presidents throughout history, when taking the action of going beyond the constitution, has helped the US when the south succeeded and when we wanted to help keep international peace. The President needs to have this power in order to become a better leader to its people and help whoever needs…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president can use military power as he decides is essential and proper to shield national security and authorize all relevant United Nations Security chamber resolutions to use force. Before starting war, under obligations Bush had to make accessible to Congress his assurance of circumstances. Indeed, under requirements he had to prove that Iraq was infringing upon UN resolutions by yet being in control of weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that Iraq was behind the 9-11 assaults. Invading Iraq started before any peaceful resolutions, an alliance between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and a threat of weapons of mass destruction was proven. In his book, Record emphasizes how the 9/11 Commission reported in 2005 that while there may have been contacts between al Qaeda and the Baathist administration, have seen no proof that these ever formed into a community relationship; nor have we seen confirmation showing that Iraq participated with al Qaeda in creating or completing assaults against the United States” (51). Furthermore, Hussein allowed UN auditors to have access to suspected weapons areas. They reported that there was no proof or conceivable sign of an atomic weapons program in Iraq. Record concludes, Iraq was a choice not because it was a convincing security threat but…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Sanders’ own words,“We live in a difficult and dangerous world, and there are no easy or magical solutions. As President and Commander-in-Chief, I will defend this nation, its people, and America’s vital strategic interests, but I will do it responsibly. America must defend freedom at home and abroad, but we must seek diplomatic solutions before resorting to military action. While force must always be an option, war must be a last resort, not the first option. As a member of Congress, I have supported the use of force only when it was a last resort and America’s vital interests were at…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Adler, David. “The Constitution and Presidential War-making.” The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy. University Press of Kansas, 1996 183-226.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Privilege

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the past, the power of executive privilege has been used by Presidents to conceal information that has to do with foreign affairs and negotiations, military, national security issues as well as deliberations and policy making that is done between the President and his top aides. This power is only used when Congress asks the President or one of his top aides to produce all of the information pertaining to an event or situation. If the President then feels that parts of this information needs to be kept secret to protect the best interest of the public, or the other issues listed previously, then he will use executive privilege in order to not give that information to Congress. A huge part of executive privilege is to protect the deliberations and advice given by the President’s aides. When the President’s advisors give him advice, they need to be able to give him the best advice possible and if there is a chance that everything they said could be made public. For instance if the President and advisors are discussing what needs to be done in relation to a foreign power and one suggests to nuke them, one suggests a covert attack and one suggests a peaceful resolution. If the final decision is a peaceful resolution, and Congress asks for all of the information on the subject, then the President should use executive privilege to keep those other possible outcomes from going public, both to keep the public from getting out of control or uneasy and to keep the other country from finding out the other options and retaliating. This power ensures that the President’s advisors can be completely honest and say what needs to be said without being worried about their words being taken the wrong way or too harsh or hurt their image.…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They support president’s decision most of the time but make extensive modification. Throughout the years, there has been a source of tension over foreign policy between Congress and the President. The source of tension is over issues such as foreign aid, human rights, trade, sanctions and declaration of war. In 1973, the Congress passed the WPA which is known as War Powers Resolution overriding President Richard Nixon’s veto amid backlash against the United State involvement in Vietnam. Under this law, the Congress requires the president to consult with them before sending only of the United State troops into hostile situations. They must report commitment of United State forces with the twenty four hour time frame. The president needs to end military action within sixty days if Congress doesn’t declare war or authorize the use of force. The president has the authority to negotiate treaties but it only goes into effect unless after the Congress ratifies it. The Congress has asserted a role in foreign policymaking by creating the War Powers…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * 1. The speaker of this rhetoric is the current president of the United States of America, Barack Obama. The thing that makes him qualified to speak on this subject is that he is the president and is in charge of the country. He is the person that gave the green light to Seal Team Six to make the move on the compound where Bin Laden was believed to be hiding. The only biographical detail that seems significant given the subject of the speech is that it is the president’s responsibility to alert the public on the major events that happen in our country.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The president has the power to issue executive orders,” Stahl said. “I am fine with him using that power.”…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benghazi Scandal

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As our priorities lie with pulling forces and weakening American influence in the Middle East, our precedence should still be with investigating the attacks in Benghazi on September 11th, 2012. This current administration has swept this issue under the rug, claiming that the reason for the government’s lack of involvement was simply that they did not know. These policies of foreign involvement are becoming more transparent to the eyes of the American citizens, and creating a doubt in the minds of the people the U.S. government is suppose to protect. From Barack Obama’s cover-up for disregarding the phone calls for help, to Hillary Clinton’s role; before, during, and after the Benghazi attack, and to the CNN International survey polls, republicans have botched the administration’s intentionally misleading statements to the American people.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays