Preview

Googlepedia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
877 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Googlepedia
Randall McClure wrote, “Googlepedia: Turning Information Behaviors into Research Skills” to explain how much today’s teenagers rely on Google and Wikipedia for research. McClure intended to help the audience decide the best way of researching by using two students as examples of what to do and what not to do when using Google and Wikipedia as resources by describing their methods and thinking then explaining what to do instead to become a better researcher, while still using Google and Wikipedia as resources (McClure221).
McClure starts the article by explaining that researching topics today is not as easy as it was in the past. McClure explains that part of research being more difficult today is that Wikipedia is a source relied on heavily,
…show more content…
Edward was asked to do his research using Wikipedia, and he located a specific view using references within the Wikipedia page quickly. He then proceeds to go back and read the summary on the Wikipedia page more in depth and then tries to find links to other sources that are of the opposing opinion to turn his paper into a debate. McClure adds his view on Edward’s research method, where he states that he agrees with how Edward is using Wikipedia but states that Edward should have built up his knowledge before looking for outside sources. Edward continues his research and looks for links to outside sources, relying on the title of the work and not the credentials of the author, the website name, or the domain the source is published with. McClure recommends that when doing research, the researcher should rely on more than just the article title, to ensure that the source is credible. Edward explains that he read just the beginning paragraphs, but he knew he would use the source due to the sources the author used. McClure does not agree with this method, saying that Edward’s essay can only be as reliable as the sources that he uses. Edward moves his search to Google, to find the original works, which leads him the online library, where he can locate credible searches with the help of his Wikipedia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howto Set Up Apa Style

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * When writing a research paper, you should never include Wikipedia as a resource, why is Wikipedia not consideration a credible source?…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his article: Is Google Making Us Stupid, the author Nicholas Carr describes how Internet searching influences he and his friends. He states that he became to lose “concentration” on books and long-articles. Therefore, he raises a view that we need to care about the Web information, although it makes human life more convenient. He wrote: “The Web [had] been a godsend to me as a writer. Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes” (Para.3). Obviously, the Internet searching technologies, for instance, Google, it really helps us save times. The Internet searching technology makes human life more convenient and make office works and school paper works more efficient.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Nicholas Carr’s article he expresses how the Internet is changing our brains and making us think differently. When he is reading a novel he experiences himself not fully opening up the book and being easily distracted. Instead of reading he is simply skimming and not delving into the text. He explains his trouble as “ I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I am dragging my wayward brain back to the text” (2). By Carr’s observations he realizes that what used to be natural is now a struggle. Instead of really researching a topic people are allowing search engines like Google, to make their lives easier and research for them. Although you are still learning and searching the links are pushing you towards an answer instead of allowing your brain to think for itself.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Main point A: Wikipedia was only a simple dream of Jimmy Wales, to build a “growing-content” encyclopedia. (Jimmy Wales, n.d.)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my studies at Ashford University, I have found writing papers fun and gained an enormous amount of knowledge through the research involved. However, I do not just jump on google and use the first Wikipedia page that pops up. These types of searches can obtain inaccurate information that can be an absolute waste of time. This is why I am extremely grateful to have access to the abundance of valid research available in the Ashford University (AU) library.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia; providing facts, advice, and opinions from one or more contributors. Although it provides users with a vast amount of information there is often no citation for the facts, which does not allow the reader to confirm the credibility of the record. The mere fact that anyone can manipulate the content submitted allows some readers to challenge the website information as biased or fabricated. Credentials are an important aspect of research; providing information only on topics in which they publish on their website.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Where can college students find some important data at the midnight when all the libraries close? The answer is: if they search on Google and they can get whatever they want. Doesn’t it sound pretty convenient while the student who gets in trouble? Absolutely! However, this kind of approach caused the college students to think less. Nicholas Carr says in the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid, “The more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (Is Google Making Us Stupid? 17). People are living with the help of the Google currently. Google is like a double-edged sword. It not only brings students good matters but also the bad things.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How the author manages to compare his argument to everyday life really captures what modern day technology is doing to the people of this era. He also does a great job of tying problems of today growing from google and the convenience of using it. Then he goes and describes how this new technology benefits him as a writer and a person but also how people become so reliant on this technology. In the article he writes “Research that once required days can now be done it minutes” (Carr 1). By adding little bits like these in his article he still is managing to voice both sides of the argument. Later in the paragraph he shifts back to withholding his argument by saying “Unlike footnotes, to which they are sometimes linked, hyperlinks don’t merely point to related works; they propel you toward them” (Carr 1). Using this he is going back to a point earlier in the story were he explained how getting side tracked is a problem and now by saying this he is pointing that the websites you use help push you away from what you were…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the emergence of the internet as a resource center for students a question arises on the credibility of web based sites. In this paper we will debate the use of Wikipedia as a credible source of information.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writer wrote this essay to warn fellow college students the dangers of using Wikipedia as an academic research source. No student wants to go through hours of studying and research for a paper and end up using incorrect information. Knowing this, the writer starts by discrediting Wikipedia…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Shallows

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the quotes in the book that really sets a tone for the argument is “at an important juncture in our intellectual and cultural history, a moment of transition between two very different modes of thinking.” (Carr) This statement alone can go a few hundred different directions between skeptics and optimists. For optimists, the internet has brought a vast abundance of information truly relevant to what you are looking for. For instance, if you are looking up information on the internet about Julius Caesar’s death, instead of that long, costly trip to the library, pull up Google and type it in and watch the results pop up. No more buying up a crapload of books that you don’t want or reading a bunch of boring books that dance around the info you truly want. Instead of that you have Google, your ultimate tool for complete research. However, other people feel that this is “dumbing down” the population. Why? Because instead of researching topics the hard way, the way that actually requires you…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Reading articles do seem to get very tiresome and useless when the internet is available. One thinks, ‘Why waste time…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays