Preview

Good Morning America Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
811 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good Morning America Analysis
Terrorism has just rocked Brussels, Belgium, no long after the Paris attack of 2016. An early-morning program on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC), Good Morning America, held a segment on March 22, 2016, on the day of the Brussels incident discussing the recent terrorist threats that have manifested in these two neighboring nations of Europe. It is after all that France and Belgium share borders right next to each other that the television program’s speculation of the their attacks’ association is a reasonable allegation. Torture is something I deem as being an unnecessary and redundant facet of security against terrorists like that of Salah Abdeslam’s position given that its goal to obtain indispensible data out of them is likely going …show more content…
Its explosions have also set the area in high alert since it forced a flood of individuals to be evacuated from airports near those places. I believe that that, without a doubt, there exist a clear-cut similarity between the attacks which have transpired in Paris and Brussels. This can be attributed to the near proximity of the terror attacks, which insinuates more than meets the eye. In essence, the analogous nature between these atrocious acts is far too much relatable to simply be a coincidence seeing as a terrorist of the Paris attack took up residence in Brussels was recently apprehended by Belgium law …show more content…
I entirely concur with Richard Clarke’s articulation the approach for torture does no yield promising results in extracting reliable information on ISIS’s associates or operations. It is afterwards that accepting any fabricated information at face-value undertakes an enormous risk regarding the lives of many individuals. A parallel situation could even have had very well come to pass in America on account of being under President Obama’s administration. By and large, cooperation is a key aspect in order for a terrorist to come clean and disclose much-need information for the Belgium security forces to truly advert the potential of further attacks and threats to its

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Association for the Prevention of Torture. “Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario.” Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: Bedford St. Martin’s, 2011. 836-851. Print.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Getting your teeth pulled and fingers snapped for not letting the enemy know where the rest of your brigade is hiding, is a common torture tactic. In most cases you just want the pain to stop, so you give false information. This is why I feel ,no, torture should not be a tactic to retrieve information and should be abolished in this country. In the essay The Torture Myth written by Anne Applebaum, torture is discussed and evaluated by the writer. Applebaum focuses on whether torture is a good vice to gain information from a person and it is insinuated that she does not, based on her arguments in the essay. I too believe torture is not a humane nor moral way to obtain truthful information.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heymann vs. Dershowitz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip Heymann and Alan Dershowitz, both professors at the prestigious Harvard University, have developed different theories about the torture as a tool for extorting information from terrorists in their works “Torture Should Not Be Authorized.” and “Yes, It Should Be ‘On the Books’” respectively . Although their opinions intersect at many points, they are somewhat different.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the past hundred years, terrorist attacks have blatantly become more severe than ever. These attacks are caused by groups who are filled with loathing towards others. In fact, one can see how terrorists are using their attacks to elicit fear and gain power in the world when analyzing the Holocaust, the events of 9/11, and the Paris bombings.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” argues that there are various reasons for allowing torture to exist in the United States of America. Levin would love to see society change its negative views on torture so that, under certain circumstances, torture would be permissible. The article starts off with a very brief description of how he believes society views the subject of torture as a negative thing. He leads on to oppose that way of thinking and provides three cases in which he believes torture must be administered with various reasons attempting to support his thoughts. The hypothetical cases Levin uses range from very extreme situations, to a situation where we may sometimes see on the news. Levin makes it clear to the audience that he does not agree with torture as a punishment and focuses on exactly what it should be used for. He also stresses that there is an important difference between terrorists and victims and he believes it would stop the talk of “terrorist rights”. Levin also writes on his belief that most terrorist do their crimes for publicity and because of that, the terrorist shall be fairly easy to identify and later be tortured. He closes the article by saying torture would cause little danger to western democracies and predicting what he believes will happen in the future.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 16th episode of season 29 of Saturday Night Live welcomed the presidential hopeful Donald Trump to host the show. The sold-out performance received copious amounts of criticism from a variety of pro-immigrant, hispanic and other minority organizations. Despite the speculation, the show went on, and Trump was warmly welcomed onto the SNL stage. Despite their host, the show did not hold off in making fun of the guest. Saturday Night Live was adequately funny and witty as usual, though I do not believe that the host contributed to their success.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Use Of Torture

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    None of these studies except Hanns Scharff`s have not been studied why we need to torture and not just have a conservation with trickery and deceitfulness instead of torturing people that may or may not have anything to do with what is happening between countries and have no information about the topic in hand therefore will be tortured until death because of the lack of information that they have.Most people are just pons playing in a king's battle that have no information even if they joined their…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering terrorist attacks that harm or potentially kill at least thousand(s) of people, torture may seem justifiable. Torture, defined in these instances as physically non-lethal, has been generally used to extract information from terrorists that may lead to the prevention of massive terrorist attack.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using torture to as a way to gain intelligence involves a tremendous amount of assumptions. The Torturer is assuming that they have the correct person, they are assuming as the victims level of involvement and guilt in the situation, and lastly by using torture they are assuming that there is no alternative way to extract the information.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are put under a time crunch that affects how we deal with situations. Michael Levin wrote in his essay “The Case for Torture” that we should use torture because it is better to torture one person who is obviously guilty. This would help insure that thousands of lives could be saved at the expense of just one or a few people. In a brief statement about terrorist’s rights, Levin says “torture is barbaric? Mass murder is more barbaric” (532). In this simple statement, Levin argues that torturing is the lesser of two evils. And it is true. Would we rather sacrifice many lives for one that is potentially guilty? Most would say no. In fact, if we allow torture to become legal, we might get results that many have not thought of. If torture was made legal, it could potentially intimidate future terrorists into thinking twice about their plans. Still, nothing is for…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torturing Prisons

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Torturing Prisoners in the War on Terror Is Never Justified."At Issue: How Should the United States Treat Prisoners in the War on Terror?. Lauri S. Friedman. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Claiming that “[i]t would be a gross dereliction of duty for any government not to keep Khalid Sheikh Mohammed isolated, disoriented, alone, despairing, . . . in order to find out what he knew about plans for future mass murder” (6). In concluding this thought, Krauthammer argues that the only time aggressive forms of interrogation techniques such as torture should be allowed are in the case of Mohammed and the al Qaeda, or in similar situations that include a terrorist who may hold vitally valuable information.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In discussions of ticking time bombs, one controversial issue has been how to deal with the alleged guilty terrorist once he is captured. On the one hand, some people, including Michael Levin, a libertarian writer and educator, argue that it is in the US government’s right to torture the guilty terrorist because his knowledge could be used to save the lives of millions. On the other hand, others, such as Philip Heymann, who is a writer that had worked in the government field, firmly states that torture should never be used because the chance that it will produce true and useful information is nearly impossible and it is vastly more crucial to preserve the international bans on torture. Shirley Jackson elaborates on Heymann’s view when she…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays