Preview

Good And Evil In Boethius The Consolation Of Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good And Evil In Boethius The Consolation Of Philosophy
In Boethius’ The Consolation of Philosophy: Book IV, the prisoner and Lady Philosophy produce a claim that the providence of God orders all things to the good, so that nothing happens for the sake of evil. Providence being the plan or ideas that God, a divine identity, has set out for us. They are trying to prove that nothing happens just because of fate, but God is the reasoning behind circumstances that are seemingly “good” or “bad.” They are also trying to prove that the bad that occurs in our lives is not truly evil, but it is a part of God’s plan for us. I agree with this claim as the support that Boethius offers for the argument and examples that are relatable to real life confirm that the argument is true. Boethius, as a Christian, argues in the text that God has a plan for all of us. Sometimes this plan can be filled with things that are good and sometimes things that are bad. Some people believe that these bad things are the evil of the …show more content…
As Boethius explains it in the text, some people are inherently set to be bad that his environment may lead his crime or bad actions to become worse. The example Boethius uses in the text, discusses a man in poverty who does crime. God must offer him some prosperity and wealth. If God does not, it may cause the man to commit more crime to steal money from others. (Book IV 138). God’s blessings on bad people allow for their bad actions to be less extreme compared to if God did not bless them. However, bad people do not always have good things happen to them. Bad people will be punished for their bad actions as God must make right with those the bad people have wronged. By punishing these bad people, it will teach them a lesson and reduce their chances of continuing to be bad and help them to become good. But, it will also prevent future bad from occurring by deterring others from committing crime or other bad actions because of the threat of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Boethius Was Successful in His Argument That God Rewards and Punishes Justly.
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Boethius Was Successful in His Argument That God Rewards and Punishes Justly.

    Boethius was a philosopher teaching at the end of the Roman empire, in his 40’s he was arrested for suspected conspiracy with the Eastern Roman Empire and was eventually put to death at the age of about 44/45. Whilst in prison Boethius wrote his book, ‘The Consolation of Philosophy’ where he discusses in great depth with Lady Philosophy issues with God’s omniscience. In his writings, Boethius identifies an issue with God’s foreknowledge, our personal autonomy and the impact of how we are to be judged as when we enter the life after this. He identifies that if God has foreknowledge and knows our future, He then knows what we are going to do which in turn removes the idea that we have freedom to do what we choose. He also sees that if we have no free will when it comes to our judgement we will be judged unfairly and unjustly as God will have caused us to do that evil or not intervened to stop us from committing that evil.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Hick and the Problem of Evil
    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Hick and the Problem of Evil

    I am writing on John Hick’s piece entitled There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil. In the selection Hick explains a theodicy, a justification of God’s goodness because of evil, the soul-making view of life in this defense of God’s way in the face of evil. The dilemma of the problem of evil is, if God is perfectly loving he must wish to abolish evil. If evil exists then God cannot be all perfectly loving. Hick’s theodicy, the soul-making view, states that God intentionally placed this evils on earth so that we can over come temptations. God wants humans to go through these test of our convictions so that they can choose good, and they can ultimately undergo spiritual growth. Hick believes that this is not evil but good, and most cannot see though the belief that the world is supposed to be a paradise.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Greco-Roman Pagan And Judeo-Christian Societies: A Comparative Analysis
    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Greco-Roman Pagan And Judeo-Christian Societies: A Comparative Analysis

    Kahn’s quote does hold true about Judeo-Christian society and Greco-Roman societies. In the nature of Judeo-Christian society, nothing is already predetermined everything is up to the choices that you make and the outcomes of those choices you make. In the instance of Adam and Eve, once they ate the fruit, they became aware of the society around them and it made them realize what they had done. Cain and Abel, Cain realized what he did after God had found out and made him suffer the eternal punishment. While in comparison, it is important to realize that there is no good and evil in Greco-Roman societies. In the Iliad, Thersites is verbally and physically assaulted by Odysseus, for speaking against the king, Agamemnon. In Judeo-Christian society this would have been viewed as morally wrong for public shaming for someone who speaks the truth. In the case of Prometheus and Zeus, Prometheus was doing his job as creator of the humans to give them fire back and make sure they are able to survive. Zeus focused more on that Prometheus defied him rather than and punished all those involved because the gods did not focus on intention rather they believed in a rigid set of…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Bayle's Paulicians And Candide: A Comparative Analysis
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Bayle's Paulicians And Candide: A Comparative Analysis

    He begins to ponder and tear at the origin of evil. He asks “where did it from”, “why is it still allowed? Bayle acknowledges that God is supposed to be wholly good and powerful. However, despites god’s power and goodness, god has allowed evil to run free. Bayle addresses in this essay the questions the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus brought to light. Epicurus states that God is either “willing to remove evil and cannot; or he can and is unwilling; … or else he is both willing and able” (Bayle p 169). However, these options bring to light an idea that is not so comfortable about God. If he is willing to remove evil but can’t to address the problem of evil, then God is not all powerful. If he can and is unwilling, then he is not good, for whom that is good would want to put his children through the trials of evil? Bayle suggests that if God is willing and able to remove evil, then why does he not remove it? In the story Candide, Voltaire agrees with the Manichean view and shows it through his writing. There are several instances where a God of Good is present in Candide’s life, and then the God of Evil interferes…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    500 Word Summary Hicks Theodicy
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    500 Word Summary Hicks Theodicy

    Irenaeus’ original theory is based on his interpretation of Genesis 1:26 ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness’. From this Irenaeus concluded that first humans were made in the image of God and are only intended to develop later into his likeness through willing cooperation. This cooperation however requires genuine freedom, as it is not possible to willingly cooperate when something is forced upon us. The freedom is the reason why evil has to exist in the world; our ability to choose to do evil instead of good makes us free. There would be no such freedom if humans were created already perfect and God policed his world continually as there would be no capacity for us to choose evil and so no free will. Therefore, the natural order had to be designed with the possibility of causing harm, humans had to be created only in the image of God, and God has to keep an epistemic distance from his creation. Eventually, however, evil and suffering will be overcome and everyone will develop into the likeness of God, living in glory in heaven.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Nature of Fortune: Analysis of Boethius' The Consolation of Philosophy
    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Nature of Fortune: Analysis of Boethius' The Consolation of Philosophy

    “There are good ships, and there are wood ships, the ships that sail the sea. But the best ships are friendships, and may they always be.” This is the very same philosophy that one of the main characters, Lady Philosophy, in The Consolation of Philosophy argues. The protagonist takes the form of Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius, who is also the author. In fact, the setting and events throughout the story pertain to himself, in the real world, as well as to the protagonist. But it seems that in Book II, Lady Philosophy has taken up the task of “diagnosing” Boethius, and trying to help him come to terms with what has happened to him. Her work is not to simply cheer up Boethius, but mainly to make him understand that his current state is not actually a bad one. In fact, he might just be better off now, than he was before. Of course, this means that she must prove to Boethius that due to his loss of fortune, he can be happier. Of course, happiness is not perfectly defined, and it seems that Lady Philosophy may actually be wrong.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Edwards Sinners In The Hand Of An Angry God
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jonathan Edwards Sinners In The Hand Of An Angry God

    Jonathan Edwards' Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God depicts an illustration when he vividly expresses that "there is dreadful pit of the glowing flames of the wrath of God; there is hell's wide gaping mouth open; and you have nothing to stand upon, nor anything to take hold of; there is nothing between you and hell but the air" (47). Jonathan Edwards emphasizes fear to influence people, impacting them and persuading them; however, some people do good deeds because they fear the consequences. This quote describes harsh Puritan beliefs and people's fear of a wrathful God threading them on the verge of hell. Also, this quote further supports the idea that people establish good behavior and actions because they fear the outcomes of not doing good deeds. Besides, Margaret Mead agrees with the idea that "it is an open question whether any behavior based on fear of eternal punishment can be regarded as ethical or should be regarded as merely cowardly" ("Margaret Mead"). This quote questions people's motives for doing good deeds; they fear the punishment of not doing good. People persuaded by fear do not carry out their actions because they want to improve the world, but because they do not want to face the outcomes. Likewise, the Bible declares to "be sure of this: The wicked will not go unpunished, but those who are righteous will go free" (The Holy Bible, Proverbs 11:21). This Bible verse highlights what will happen to those who refuse helping others because of fear; they will receive punishment because they fear the consequences if they do not help others. Either way, people will not be off the hook for helping others while under the idea that they only do it because they fear the consequences of not doing good deeds. Indeed, outcomes can make or break a decisions, but the intentions define people and their…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Good And Evil In Beowulf
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Good And Evil In Beowulf

    We’ve grown quite a lot through time with technology, architecture, and even through our ideals. In the Beowulf the epic (Heaney 2000), we see right and wrong through the eyes of the past and it is strange to say the least. The author wrote this for their intended audience, meaning they were reflecting the cultural values of the ancient Anglo-Saxons. In the movie, Beowulf and Grendel (Gunnarsson 2005), we see changes from the original work that seems to match to modern ideas of right and wrong. Two characters, Hrothgar and Grendel, one who was a man of the light and kin of the dark respectively, were changed to match the ideals we hold today into completely different people that we had known them to be.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lady Philosophy And Boethius: An Analysis
    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lady Philosophy And Boethius: An Analysis

    In The Consolation of Philosophy, the teacher Lady Philosophy and the student Boethius develop a relationship of learning through dialogue that enables the Boethian prisoner to attain his spiritual goal. Lady Philosophy is a good teacher. Instead of telling the philosophical truth directly to Boethius, she chooses to maintain a discussion between her and her student based on Boethius’s arguments. Through the discussion, Lady Philosophy at first finds out the errors of Boethius’s assumptions and then guides him to understand the nature of goods in a deeper way. As the dialogue moves on, Boethius gradually grows as a good student from complaining about his imprisonment to asking questions on a universal level, and he finally learns the method to attain his spiritual goal, God.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Oedipus The King: A Tragic Analysis
    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Oedipus The King: A Tragic Analysis

    A tragic hero is defined as “a [great] man who is neither a paragon of virtue and justice nor undergoes the change to misfortune through any real badness or wickedness but because of some mistake” (“Aristotle”, n.d.). Therefore, a tragic hero has some sort of tragedy that surrounds their life. A tragic hero also makes dramas more interesting and makes readers think. Dramas sometimes either exemplify or refute Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero. Oedipus by Sophocles exemplifies Aristotle’s definition in four different aspects. The first aspect involves both Oedipus’ ignorance and knowledge of his life situations, the second involves his hamartia, the third involves the actual plot itself, and the fourth involves the characterization of…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Good Vs. Evil In Beowulf
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Good Vs. Evil In Beowulf

    In the poem of Beowulf, how is the theme loyalty, revenge and good vs. evil ? In those meaning the themes could definitely relate to the poem. To begin with, as reading the poem of beowulf it could fill in loyalty, revenge and good vs evil. the main character is beowulf because he is the ones that carries this poem to his journey. The other main characters are grendel, grendel mother and hrothgar. In the poem of beowulf is based on an old English written in anglo-saxon culture. Its also about a young warrior brings joyful around his castle and destroys nightmare away. He also becomes the biggest hero for hrothgar and serves his people of his territory where they defend their place. The theme of loyalty takes place where the king hrothgar who onced saved his father. For example, by his…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Free Will Theodicy: The Problem Of Evil
    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Free Will Theodicy: The Problem Of Evil

    Recall the two types of evil that have been mentioned: moral evil and natural evil. Having free will, human beings are able to make choices about their actions freely, although some might take advantage of such a privilege to commit wrongdoings, subsequently inflicting harm on others. Such instances of harm are instances of moral evil since they are caused by human beings; therefore, it can be said that the Free Will Theodicy has successfully explained the consistency of the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God and the existence of moral evil. However, while instances of moral evil are the products of human free will, instances of natural evil, such as natural disasters, are not caused by human beings, but they occur simply as a result of the working of nature. Therefore, since instances of natural evil are not associated with human free will, God can eliminate them without violating anyone’s free will. Yet people still suffer from instances of natural evil in everyday life, and an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God would not allow such things to occur as He only wants the best for humankind and has the ability to prevent them. Therefore, the Free Will Theodicy has failed in showing that God must be all-powerful, all-knowing, and…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Nature Of Evil In Othello
    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Nature Of Evil In Othello

    In the opening scenes, Shakespeare portrays Othello as a noble character. Othello maintains his calm behavior until Iago taunts him with lies. Othello’s language transforms him into a monster due to his jealousy. "Oh, beware, my lord, of jealousy; It is the green eyed monster which doth mock" At first, he simply doubts his wife's loyalty. Othello starts to use the animal imagery that Iago used throughout the play (3.3.407).…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?
    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ring Of Gyge In Plato's The Republic
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ring Of Gyge In Plato's The Republic

    While people like to think that humans are built to be inherently good, that is not necessarily true. Humans’ minds are wired to indulge in matters that appeal to their own benefit. In Plato’s The Republic, there is a section in which Glaucon uses a story of the ring of Gyges to illustrate the natural unjust of people. He claims that no man, given the opportunity, would reject the chance to do injustice without punishment. I agree with Glaucon’s perspective. Humans would do absolutely anything if they couldn’t be held accountable for their actions.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics