Gmo's Are A Grand Experiment On Health, Enviorment: Article Analysis
I was born and raised in a small rural town in western Kansas. I have learned hardworking values growing up on a farm. My family relies on farming and ranching as a way of life. So, when I hear people talking about how GMO’s are bad for people’s health and our environment, it makes me feel concerned about the information people are receiving. GMO’s don’t affect the health of people or the environment at all. Instead they help to improve crop yields by modifying the seeds according to where a person lives by being drought resistant or bug resistant for example. This helps farmers and ranchers such as my family to make more profit from a higher yield. This results in more food produced which can help in a world with an ever-growing population.
…show more content…
She tells consumers to be wary about consuming GMO’s, since they have not been proven safe for consumption yet. She also says a healthy alternative to GMO’s would be the production and consumption of more fruits and vegetables. However, she is a Nutritionist who writes for Livescience. Nutritionist encourages people to eat more organic food such as fruits and vegetables. So, since she stands for more organic foods, it only makes sense that she would be opposed to modified foods. Her article that was published in 2013 is outdated to the newest research that has been conducted by scientist as recent as 2016. Her article tells people to stay away from GMO’s because they are not healthy and are bad for our environment which she has not proven in her article, because she never used facts to show how these GMO’s are both bad for humans and the …show more content…
There would be a surplus because there is not very much of a demand from consumers for more fruits and vegetables. Now if there was a surplus of fruits and vegetables that would mean a shortage of modified food such as corn and soybeans. There would be a shortage of modified foods such as corn and soybeans, because there is a greater demand for them, but because of the production of more fruits and vegetables on farmland that use to be used to plant GM foods there would be a reduction of GM food planted. This would contradict Tallmadge’s statement of how GMO’s won’t be a very reliable solution to solve world hunger. So, as you can see people demand more GM foods than they do fruits and vegetables, so it would not make since to plant more fruits and vegetables where GM foods used to be planted because then we would have a surplus of fruits and vegetables and a shortage of GM foods. If there is a surplus of fruits and vegetables that people don’t eat and a shortage on modified foods such as corn and soybeans, then this is making the problem of world hunger even worse. Consumers of food influence what producers will produce. If consumers truly want more fruits and vegetables, there would be a shortage of them because there would be a greater demand for them. If there was a greater demand for fruits and vegetables it would make it feasible for some farmers to convert
She tells consumers to be wary about consuming GMO’s, since they have not been proven safe for consumption yet. She also says a healthy alternative to GMO’s would be the production and consumption of more fruits and vegetables. However, she is a Nutritionist who writes for Livescience. Nutritionist encourages people to eat more organic food such as fruits and vegetables. So, since she stands for more organic foods, it only makes sense that she would be opposed to modified foods. Her article that was published in 2013 is outdated to the newest research that has been conducted by scientist as recent as 2016. Her article tells people to stay away from GMO’s because they are not healthy and are bad for our environment which she has not proven in her article, because she never used facts to show how these GMO’s are both bad for humans and the …show more content…
There would be a surplus because there is not very much of a demand from consumers for more fruits and vegetables. Now if there was a surplus of fruits and vegetables that would mean a shortage of modified food such as corn and soybeans. There would be a shortage of modified foods such as corn and soybeans, because there is a greater demand for them, but because of the production of more fruits and vegetables on farmland that use to be used to plant GM foods there would be a reduction of GM food planted. This would contradict Tallmadge’s statement of how GMO’s won’t be a very reliable solution to solve world hunger. So, as you can see people demand more GM foods than they do fruits and vegetables, so it would not make since to plant more fruits and vegetables where GM foods used to be planted because then we would have a surplus of fruits and vegetables and a shortage of GM foods. If there is a surplus of fruits and vegetables that people don’t eat and a shortage on modified foods such as corn and soybeans, then this is making the problem of world hunger even worse. Consumers of food influence what producers will produce. If consumers truly want more fruits and vegetables, there would be a shortage of them because there would be a greater demand for them. If there was a greater demand for fruits and vegetables it would make it feasible for some farmers to convert