Global Warming Response Paper
My thesis statement was a multiple sentence statement. It included linking Global Warming to relatable everyday situations, and the author trying to inform others about global warming.
My writing didn’t really establish authority as, my response wasn’t really an analysis. This paper was more so a summary of the article. Although, I do have some statements that explain the quotes I used out of the article. My position on the first response paper is to show how the author tries to make this controversial topic relatable and understandable, as some people still do not believe global warming is a true issue. In order for the author’s topic to become successful, it would have to become understandable to the readers. The readers who don’t yet believe in global warming have to see information that they can link to their personal everyday lives to show that this problem does impact them. My appeals were based on the appeals from the author. The appeals of relatability and practicality. An increased AC bill affects everyone involved. A related example of the stored energy by big corporation and this being applied to amounts of bottles in relation to alcoholic drinks. This example is important as most …show more content…
However, it was influence in that I support the author’s stance on global warming. I provided information and example to back up his argument. My narrative voice in this response paper was a supportive one. I told the readers about the issue, and then I back up the information with examples from the author. My strengths of evidence refers to the drinking example, the ac bill. Both of these examples provide great relatability to the readers. The readers are able to see a link between their everyday lives and an increase in an AC bill. My weakness of evidence is supplying my own opinions on the matter, as well as not analyzing the authors work. I didn’t provide any kinds of information that relates
My writing didn’t really establish authority as, my response wasn’t really an analysis. This paper was more so a summary of the article. Although, I do have some statements that explain the quotes I used out of the article. My position on the first response paper is to show how the author tries to make this controversial topic relatable and understandable, as some people still do not believe global warming is a true issue. In order for the author’s topic to become successful, it would have to become understandable to the readers. The readers who don’t yet believe in global warming have to see information that they can link to their personal everyday lives to show that this problem does impact them. My appeals were based on the appeals from the author. The appeals of relatability and practicality. An increased AC bill affects everyone involved. A related example of the stored energy by big corporation and this being applied to amounts of bottles in relation to alcoholic drinks. This example is important as most …show more content…
However, it was influence in that I support the author’s stance on global warming. I provided information and example to back up his argument. My narrative voice in this response paper was a supportive one. I told the readers about the issue, and then I back up the information with examples from the author. My strengths of evidence refers to the drinking example, the ac bill. Both of these examples provide great relatability to the readers. The readers are able to see a link between their everyday lives and an increase in an AC bill. My weakness of evidence is supplying my own opinions on the matter, as well as not analyzing the authors work. I didn’t provide any kinds of information that relates