Preview

Gladiator: Roman Empire and Marcus Aurelius

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gladiator: Roman Empire and Marcus Aurelius
The Moral Ethics in the Film Gladiator

The film Gladiator is a powerful and emotional film. The hovering theme throughout it is; perseverance, determination, never lose hope. It is a historical film, released in 2000, with factual events and people, taken place in Rome around 180 A.D. There are many characters in this film. The characters are diverse, and are all different from one another. The three main and most memorable characters are; Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, and Maximus. Caesar Marcus Aurelius is the emperor of Rome, and the overseer of the Roman military. Commodus is the film’s antagonist/villain. The main character and protagonist in Gladiator is Maximus Meridius, who is a vengeful gladiator. He is completely against Commodus, after he sent to have his family killed. Each character has their own set of ethics. A person’s ethics is their moral code and principles. It is

the rules that tell us what to do. The word ethics, comes from the Greek word meaning “character”. Marcus Aurelius is one of the very first characters, which we as the audience, are introduced to in the film. Marcus Aurelius is the emperor of Rome. He is an old man, with a very tired expression. Aurelius oversees the Roman army, and wants nothing but the best for his people. That shows a part of his character. Since, he is a good man; he does make hard but necessary decisions. One of the hard decisions Marcus Aurelius made was; choosing Maximus over his own son, Commodus, as the next heir for emperor. He knew in his heart that his son was not ready for the throne, and would make a terrible emperor. He blames himself for how his son turned out as a man. Commodus is an example of a person with very poor ethics. Commodus is the royal son of emperor Marcus Aurelius. He is spoiled beyond belief. Commodus only cares for himself, and does not think

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spartacus was an important leader in Rome. He was born in 109 BC and died in 71 BC on a battlefield near Petelia Italy. His occupation was a Gladiator. He is best known for leading a slave uprising against Rome. Spartacus was of the the Thracian nationality. He joined the Roman army when he was young. When he tried to leave the army, he was caught and sold into slavery. He was then forced to be a gladiator. A gladiator was a man trained to fight wild animals and other gladiators in an arena. In 73 BC seventy gladiators with Spartacus as their leader, escaped the gladiator school. They fled to Mount Vesuvius near the city of Pompeii gathering slaves and weapons. Rome sent an army of 3,000 men led by Claudius Glaber. Spartacus surprised the…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie never showed Marcus Aurelius in his youth when he was the ruler, but only showed when he was a dying man. Of course, the movie was not based off Marcus Aurelius, but it could have gone more in depth of what his beliefs were on life and his citizens. The movie kind of represents Rome as a great city, but in reality, while Aurelius was the Emperor, Rome was not all that great. Aurelius went through a tough time during his reign. He spent most of the times defending his empire against the Parthians, Germans, and Britons. The movie also shows him getting killed by his son Commodus, but he really died of a plague during another war in which he was trying to defend the territory of…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marcus Aurelius would have had mixed feelings about the collapse of the Roman Empire in the mid-to-late third century AD. An admirer of change, Marcus would have accepted the direction that the Empire was heading in, but not necessarily through the murderous means in which it transpired. He also was an enormous aficionado of living as close to in accordance with nature as was possible and not enjoying an overly lavish lifestyle. Few of the Emperors during the mid-to-late third century AD were overtly careless with their reigns, and most were entirely focused on maintaining defense. According to Aurelius, nothing could be more in accordance with nature than death, or in this case a violent death, which was the fate of every emperor that took…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ridley Scott’s Gladiator (2000), was the first film set in the ancient world produced since the 1960s. Since then, there have been many more films made set in the ancient world. The question is, why was Gladiator able to revive the ancient world genre? After seeing films like Ben-Hur and Spartacus, two of the greatest films ever made set in the ancient world. it is hard not to see the cinematic cues that Gladiator takes from these films. Ben-Hur follows the story of Judah Ben-Hur after he was betrayed by his childhood friend and seeks revenge against the man who wronged. In Gladiator, we have Maximus go on a quest for vengeance after the new emperor has ordered him executed and kills his family. From Ben-Hur we know that this kind of story is not one likely to go our of fashion. Even modern movies that are not set in the ancient world have a story like this.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gladiator Movie Analysis

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By currently taking this History & Philosophy of Sports class, this film “Gladiator” establishes the whole scenery during the time period of ancient Rome. In the film, it introduced Gladiator battles. These Gladiator battles reflected as entertainment to society, as well as, being a survival setting between life and death. Not only they would compete for survival, but they would compete to become the best. By this time, Commodus, is the new Roman emperor and he fears that Maximus could use his heroic ability to dethrone him and become emperor himself. Maximus would use his fame and popularity as a gladiator to invoke further damage to Commodus' insecure dominance of the devoted Roman people, hoping to influence them to restore their lost values and overcome the corruption that…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fictional story of Gladiator is simplicity itself. General Maximus (Russell Crowe) fights in the wilds of Germania with the dying Emperor Marcus Aurelius, is promised the throne with the mission of returning Rome to “The Republic.” Before he can finalize his anguished deliberations, Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix), Marcus' son, sends his father out and claims the throne. Maximus is sentenced to death as a possible opponent, and is taken to the Black Forest for a messy death. His wife and child are similarly condemned. Maximus escapes, badly wounded, rushes home to save his family but gets there too late. Exhausted and distraught, he is picked up by slaves passing through the land. Sold in the provinces as a gladiator, his training and attitude towards death is attractive to people and they follow his lead.…

    • 741 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Ceasar Theme

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis: Which Character, Brutus or Cassius, would best fit Aristotle’s description of a tragic hero?…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie’s plotline still loosely follows the series of events that actually took place but has changed quite a lot of the facts. Gladiator warps the facts here because Marcus Aurelius supposedly was murdered by Commodus on the eve of this victory but Aurelius in fact passed away before going out to claim another land. Marcus did conquer many tribes and lands as emperor but did not in fact have a legendary general named “Maximus Decimus Meridius”. The events that actually took place in our historical timeline involve Marcus Aurelius passing away but not at the hand of his son Commodus. The official story states that Aurelius died from plague but some suspect that he was in fact murdered by Commodus. According to historical sources, Commodus was in fact a man of ill worth but Aurelius did give Commodus succession to the…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare is a play about honor, integrity, and political strife. Each character is faced with difficult decisions influenced either by ambition or honor. Marcus Brutus, one of the main characters of the play, although one of Caesar's best friends, is the head conspirator plotting for Caesar's death. Marcus Brutus is motivated by honor…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 1

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethics is the standards of behavior, developed as a result of one’s concept of right and wrong.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the long history of the United States, hundreds of men and women have forever altered the military with their legacies, ideas, and values. In this paper, I will discuss the life and legacy of the famed Roman Emperor, Marcus Aurelius. His musings have come to define the essence of the ideal military leader and how such individuals can live peacefully while in the heart of war. With his large contributions to Stoic philosophy, Marcus Aurelius has significantly impacted the military of today.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marcus Brutus is one of the many ignoble Romans in Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus does not thoroughly analysis the consequences that…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, Commodus, son of the Emperor of Rome, with his 28 years, was good looking, handsome and brave , but that was just an ornament, because he was not more that an instigator, envious,coward and incestuous. He thought that he was “the perfect picture of a new, young emperor”, but he is not a good man. Another important point in this essay, is when happened the story?…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social ethics are the philosophical or moral principles that, in one way or another, represent the collective experience of people and cultures.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics