Preview

Gerard Duval In All Quiet On The Western Front

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
594 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerard Duval In All Quiet On The Western Front
War, the waging of armed conflict against an enemy, (as described in the dictionary), made the world a time of major destruction from 1914 to 1918. World War 1, aka The Great War, was a time of bloody battles. The problem being, those that were killed were never really recognized beyond having fought for their country. One of the most memorable characters in the story All Quiet On the Western Front is a French soldier named Gerard Duval, because he symbolizes the millions of good people that lost their lives during the Great War.

All soldiers in the war were trained not to care about anything but war itself, and to only pay attention to the main objective they must complete. The French solider Gerard Duval was a looking glass for Paul. Gerard Duval was a key part of the story, he allowed Paul to witness the terrors of the war first hand. Before Paul had his encounter with Gerard, he was basically making opinions based on things he saw, and heard. This man helped Paul see the darker side of the war he found himself in.
…show more content…
Every day of the war, thousands of men and women died; whether they were participating or not. The soldiers in the war were trained to not pay attention to the horrible things happening right under their noses. The first hand account that Gerard provided Paul was very key in the change of Paul’s perspective on the war as a whole. This made him feel extremely emotional for the time he spent in the shot hole after Paul had killed Gerard. If Gerard had not fallen into the hole, and Paul hadn’t stabbed him 4 times in the chest, Paul’s outlook on the war would have been exactly the same as it was before; he would have been one of the carless men running around with a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After ending Gérard Duval's life in the trench, Paul feels guilty of taking another man's life. He struggles to cope with his moral injury as he feels he did not need to kill the man. Paul believes that Gerard Duval poses no threat to him as Gerald is already helpless and dying. Paul states that he “would give much if he would stay alive”, and “each word [he] translate pierces [him] like a shot in the chest” (Remarque 221 and 225). Paul wishes that he could have taken back what he had done and allow the man to die on his own. Paul faces the reality of war, as his own hands become a weapon. Similarly, the speaker in “The Man He Killed” struggles with internal conflict after killing an enemy in combat. The speaker tries to reason with himself in hopes of justifying his actions. He momentarily forgets why he shot the man, but then states “I shot him dead because- / because he was my foe” (Hardy 9-10). The speaker pauses based on the repetition of “because” to indicate his confusion as to why he shot the man in the first place. The speaker continues on, not putting much thought towards the topic. Both Paul and the speaker battle a similar internal conflict, a conflict that every soldier has to deal…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of All Quiet on the Western Front, Remarque really emphasized on how Paul’s…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, war has been constantly evolving. Over time, it has taken a new less glorious form. World War One was one of the most devastating and transformative events in human history. In Erich Maria Remarque’s book, All Quiet on the Western Front, he depicts the horrors of “the great war” by showing the complete disregard for human life in modern warfare. This war modeled the way that any future war would be fought. It would shape human history by completely changing the game of warfare and people’s opinions of it. Remarque shows, from his point of view, the terrors that happen on a daily basis on the front lines, and away from it, of World War One. World War One changed the perception of war in a big way and opened the eyes of so many people to the horrors of modern warfare.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I also portrayed that war wasn’t as bad as Paul explained it. I thought that it was just two large armies, in a large battlefield, shooting at each other like in the American Revolution. I didn’t realize that the tactics and the “scene” of the battle changed as much as had. The way Paul described…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soldiers’ lives were lost one after the other, day by day as the war went on. In the beginning of the novel, Paul’s company received a short stay after two weeks of fighting. Only 80 men out of 150 were still alive. The cook didn’t want to give the survivors the rations that were meant for the dead men, but eventually agreed to do so. The soldiers dealt with the many deaths and their aspects changed with their wants. For example, food and double rations of cigarettes were more important…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering his experience on the front Paul is feeling hopeless and doesn't believe that he can make it. After all he is broken, rootless, and weary from the war. Also he is convulsing and about to die so he is obviously feeling hopeless because he really has almost no chance to live. He is also feeling like all this time in the war is pretty pointless since he doesn't even know what the war is about. He has been out there risking his life everyday for a reason that he doesn't even…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being that Paul and his friends are still teenagers, they can crack jokes and banter with each other during the hardest of times. “But by far the most important result was that it awakened in us a strong, practical sense of esprit de corps, which in the field developed into the finest thing that arose out of the war-comradeship” (26-27). The french word, esprit de corps, translates to “Spirit of Men” which is very relative to the story. The only way to survive mentally and emotionally is to take comfort from fellow men, otherwise, one would lose their minds. As Paul sees the effects of war, his friends remind him that they will be there for each other as a “pact”and they can all make light of the horrors of war. Knowing that you have the support from your friends is a comforting thought, especially to remember whilst serving on the battlefield. “I open his collar and place his head more comfortably...I climb down, take out my handkerchief, spread it out, push it under and scoop up the yellow water that strains through into the hollow of my hand. He gulps it down. I fetch some more. Then, I unbutton his tunic…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This quote relates to the theme that for the soldiers war is greater than the idea of family. The soldiers in Paul’s company have come to a point where they believe in killing more than they do in their own family. This again ties in with the theme that war changes who you are and the way that you think.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul’s thoughts on his youth are “And even if these scenes of our youth were given back to us we would hardly know what to do.” An immense amount of Paul and other soldiers’ youth was taken away from them too soon, even if these scenes of youth were given back to them they could not regain the old intimacy with these scenes. This quote also shows Paul’s loss of innocence. Paul has become wiser during the war, but this wisdom is leaving him with no hope in his future. Paul also says that if the scenes of their youth were given back to them “...it would be like gazing at a photograph of a dead comrade…” This quote shows how much Paul misses his youth but there is no way for him to connect with it. Youth and innocence is nowhere to be found for Paul and other…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book All Quiet on the Western Front the main character and narrator Paul describes the war as not fighting for his country but fighting for his own survival. This theme has been repeatedly outspoken in the book because Paul and the other characters have lost their sense of patriotism. Once the characters have left their previous feelings of patriotism, which is why they joined the war initially, they have no other choice but to fight in order to survive the war. Throughout the book Paul thinks back to when he was in school listening to one of his teachers lecture and he thought that at this point he had great feelings of patriotism and love for his country. Later on in the book when he is with his classmates overseas in the war he realizes that he no longer fights in the war is for love of country but for his own survival.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johann Gottfried von Herder and Ernest Renan both tried to give a definition to a notion of a nation, and the ways they used to do so were, seemingly, similar. First, they both incorporate the idea of nature and its barriers and unifications – mountains and rivers – in their works; however, each of them proves different points. Herder argues that “if otherwise mountains had arisen, rivers flowed, or coasts trended, then how very different would mankind have scattered over this tilting place of nations” meaning that he believes that nature and the planet surface is one of the main reasons so many distinguishable nations exist (Herder 2). Renan, on the other hand, believes that geography, although important, is not an absolute reason…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the slaughter of Gerard Duval, Paul’s conscience seemed to have completely drained and the murder has changed him emotionally, but he is later supplied with sympathy. When Paul was ordered to observe furtively upon the position and movement of his belligerent enemy, but Paul departs in trepidation and was suddenly surprised when an unknown being crawls into Paul’s shell hole; as a result, Paul continuously stabs the unknown being. As Paul remains in the shell hole with the soldier, he experiences, “This dying man has time with him, he has an invisible dagger which he stabs [Paul]: Time and time” (221). After Paul had stabbed the French soldier with an actual weapon, a human that Paul should conceive as an “abstraction” suffering, fills…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Paul progresses through war, his skin becomes thick, he begins to look more and more like a leader. He treats new comrades with respect and encouragement. After surviving an enemy bombardment, Paul attempts to comfort a startled newbie. (P.60) “That’s no disgrace ... Many’s the man before you has had his pants full after the first bombardment. Go behind that tree and take your underpants off.” Paul treats the frightened soldier as a friend and tells him everything is alright, he even tells him to take his dirty pants off so the rest of his embarrassing experience is somewhat bearable. Paul has been in this boy’s shoes before, Paul speaks from his heart, and he knows exactly what to say to make the soldier not feel out of place. He makes such an effort to comfort this boy because he wish’s someone had treated and cared for him as he is doing now. He understands how crappy war can be at such a young age and doesn’t want it to be as tough as it was for him. Another scene where Paul takes charge and plays a companion role is when he is trying to save his fellow squad member from the enemy gas. “I swipe at him with the satchel, he doesn’t see—once again,—once again… I reach the man, his satchel on the side nearest me, I seize the mask, pull it over his head, he understands now” (P.65). Paul risks his life by standing in…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the book, Paul’s attitude towards Keller changes many times usually as a direct result of the way Keller treats him. For example, when Keller throws away one of Paul’s manuscripts, Paul fiercely hates him but when Keller surprisingly says that Paul should have won the music competition, Paul once again feels genuine affection for him. These changes in feelings by Paul show that he is a character who often lets his heart rule his head, and that his behaviour is very often dictated by his emotional condition.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To survive the war, soldiers have to sacrifice any logical instinct or emotion and fight on animal instinct. They start out level-minded, but when they reach the front all that changes, as Paul believes when he says, “We march up, moody or good tempered soldiers – we reach the zone where the front begins and become on instinct human animals” (56). This animal instinct is necessary for their survival. When they are put in a situation concerning warfare, their mind adapts to the environment and begins to think of the enemy as targets, rather than human beings. It is simply a defensive mechanic that allows them to save themselves without the feeling of guilt. Paul’s opinion is that, “We have become wild beasts. We do not fight, we defend ourselves against annihilation…No longer do we lie helpless, waiting on the scaffold, we can destroy and kill, to save ourselves; to save ourselves and be revenged” (113). They are so preoccupied with fighting and staying alive, that their emotions completely disappear. This is proven by Paul’s thoughts: “If your own father came over with them you would not hesitate to fling a bomb at him”…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays