Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Genetic Observations Through the Studies of Hybrid Corn, Single Gene

Better Essays
1881 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Genetic Observations Through the Studies of Hybrid Corn, Single Gene
Genetic Observations Through The Studies of Hybrid Corn, Single Gene Human Traits, and Fruit Flies

The basic foundation of modern genetics was led by Gregor Mendel (Corcos,
1993). Mendel was not the first to experiment with heredity, and our Lyman
Briggs biology class will not be the last to deal with genetics. Genetics is the science of heredity. In our lab, we had three main objectives. First, we evaluated our data on monohybrid and dihybrid corn cross seed counts against
Mendel 's theoretical expectations of independent assortment and the segregation of alleles. Next, we used the Hardy-Weinberg Theorem to provide a theoretically expected value for allele frequencies for single human gene traits. Lastly, we dealt with Drosophila melanogaster and we examined red and white eye alleles to determine if this gene is sex-linked or autosomal. During the mid 1800 's Mendel bred garden peas to study inheritance. He choose these plants because of their well defined characteristics and the ability to be grown and crossed (Campbell, 1996). Mendel wanted to know the genetic basis for variation among individuals and what accounted for the transmission of traits from generation to generation. Mendel followed traits for the P generation, F1 generation, and F2 generation. The P generation is the original true-breeding parents. Their hybrid offspring is the F1 generation, the first filial. The F2 generation is the second filial and is the self- pollination of the F1 hybrids. It was predominantly his research on the F2 generation that led to Mendel 's Law of Segregation and Law of Independent
Assortment (Campbell, 1996). Mendel 's Law of Segregation states that alleles sort into separate gametes. He formed this through performing monohybrid crosses. The F2 generation will have a 3:1 phenotypic ratio. By considering more than one trait
Mendel formed his Law of Independent Assortment. He questioned whether traits were inherited independently or dependently. By performing dihybrid crosses he found that genes are independent and will form all possible combinations .
Crossing two different traits resulted in a 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio (Campbell,
1996).
Thomas Hunt Morgan also had a major contribution in the study of inheritance. He was the first to associate a specific gene with a specific chromosome. Morgan used Drosophila melanogaster, which are commonly known as fruit flies. These were a good choose because they are prolific breeders, and they only have four pairs of chromosomes (Davis, 1996). Morgan linked a fly 's eye color to its sex. He found that females carry two copies of this gene, while the male only carries one . Morgan 's work also led to a new, more wildly used way for symbolizing alleles (Campbell, 1996).

Materials and Methods

Materials and methods were as per Davis (1996). For the corn cross lab, corn was counted off of the ears of the corn, rather than through jars. For the human characteristics between 143 to 149 students were observed. Seven different single human gene traits were considered for this lab. The fruit fly cross was set up on September 24, 1996. The parental (P) generation begun with ten red-eyed males and six white-eyed females. The parent flies were removed on
October 3, 1996. Data collection was stopped on October 10, 1996.

Results

A punnett square was used for the monohybrid corn cross to find the genotypes of the potential offspring. The gamete combinations were Su=smooth seeds with an observed value of 497, and an expected value of 451.5; and su= wrinkled seeds with an observed value of 105, and an expected value of 150.5.
The chi-squared value was 18.35, this value didn 't correspond with any of the given probability values. The Null hypothesis with a 3:1 phenotypic ratio was rejected (see figure 1). Hence, the observed number of smooth seeds versus wrinkled seeds is not different from the expected 3:1 ratio for a monohybrid cross (see table 1). A dihybrid cross was used to find the genotypes of potential offspring regarding two traits. The offspring possibilities were SuP=smooth, purple seeds with an observed value of 577 and an expected value of 617.6; Sup=smooth, yellow seeds with an observed value of 229 and an expected value of 205.9; suP=wrinkled, purple seeds with an observed value of 210 and an expected value of 205.9; and sup=wrinkled, yellow seeds with an observed value of 68.6. The chi-squared value was 7.96, and the Null hypothesis was again rejected. The Null hypothesis stated that the observed number of smooth, purple seeds versus smooth, yellow seeds versus wrinkled, purple seeds versus wrinkled, yellow seeds is not different than the expected ratio of 9:3:3:1 for a dihybrid cross (see table 2 and figure 2). For the single gene human traits, between 143 to 149 students were observed. The amount of data for each of the seven different traits varied.
One trend was that six out of the seven traits had a higher frequency for the recessive allele (see table 3). In the fruit fly cross, a total of 99 fruit flies were collected.
Forty-four white-eyed males with a phenotype of X^wY, and forty-five red-eyed females with a phenotype of X^+X^w. The phenotypes of the flies were the cross between a red-eyed male, X^+Y, and a white-eyed females, X^wX^w (see table 4).

Discussion

Data for the monohybrid cross did not correspond with the expected values. The monohybrid phenotypic ratio of 3 smooth seeds versus 1 wrinkled seed is derived from the punnett square (see table 1). My observed values were
497 smooth seeds and 105 wrinkled seeds. Their expected values were 451.5 smooth seeds and 150.5 wrinkled seeds (see figure 1). The chi-squared value was used to interpret data, and the value for chi-squared was too high. Therefore, it was rejected (see figure 1). This test can be used to see how well data fits a theoretical exception. The expected frequency can be found by multiplying the punnett square phenotypic ratios by the amount of corn counted. The chi-squared number was found to be 18.35 and was then compared to the probability chart
(Davis, 1996). The probability value must be greater than 0.05 to accept the
Null hypothesis. The Null hypothesis was rejected since there was not a 3:1 ratio. The dihybrid cross also rejected the Null hypothesis. The observed and expected values differed for smooth & purple seeds, smooth & yellow seeds, wrinkled & purple seeds, and wrinkled & yellow seeds (see figure 2). The chi- squared value was calculated the same way as the monohybrid cross, with four different traits rather than just two. The Null hypothesis expected a 9:3:3:1 ratio, which it did not have. Both the monohybrid and dihybrid crosses had chi-squaered values that were too high. Therefore, both Null hypothesis ' were rejected. This may have been due to an observational error. The kernels may have been miscounted or interpreted wrong. The monohybrid corn cross illustrated Mendel 's Law of Segregation, and
Mendel 's Law of Independent Assortment was demonstrated by the dihybrid corn cross. The understanding of meiosis is central to an understanding in genetics.
Meiosis is a process consisting of two consecutive cell divisions, called meiosis I and meiosis II, resulting in four daughter cells, each with only half as many chromosomes as the parent (Campbell, 1996). Genetics is the science of heredity. Therefore, in understanding the process of meiosis, we learn how it is that we acquire our own unique set of genes. By conducting the single gene human trait experiment, phenotypes of a given list of traits were determined by individual students. A set of possible genotypes for these given traits were also found (see table 3). The allele frequency is a numerical value of the dominant or recessive allele appears. We find these values by using the Hardy-Weinberg equation. One significant item was the frequency of alleles of the students in our class. The recessive allele had a higher frequency for six out of the seven traits considered. The traits that followed this trend were: the bent pinky, eye color, widow 's peak, thumb crossing, ear lobe, and the hitchhhiker 's thumb. Allele frequency is found by using the Hardy-Weinberg equation (see figure 3). It is a number that tells you how often that allele, dominant or recessive appears. The tendency for the recessive allele to have a higher frequency may have to do with natural selection. On the other hand, the phenotype frequency differs from the allele frequency because the phenotype is made of two alleles and the heterozygous genes consist of both alleles. I could only definitely determine two of my genotypes for this experiment. They are not having a bent pinky, bb,and not having a widow 's peak, ww. This can be determined because both of these traits are homozygous recessive (see table 3). I don 't know whether or not the rest of my single human gene traits are homozygous dominant or heterozygous. To decipher the genotype of the fruit flies a punnett square was used
(see table 4). The fruit fly cross started with ten red-eyed males and six white-eyed females. Their offspring resulted with red-eyed females and white- eyed males. The experiment resulted in the ‘way ‘ we expected. Red eyes are the dominant allele, with forty-five counted female offspring and the recessive allele, white eyes had forty-four males counted. These traits appeared in the opposite sex then in the P generation. Therefore, the red/white eye allele is sex-linked among fruit flies. Hence, red eyes is the dominant allele, the female receives this from the male parent, the male then picks up the white eyes
(see table 4). Through the genetics lab we observed many different concepts. Through our evaluation of the monohybrid and dihybrid corn cross seed counts we connected them to Mendel 's Laws of Independent Assortment and the Segregation of
Alleles. Using the monohybrid cross, Mendel 's Law of Segregation was described by portraying the 3:1 phenotypic ratio in the first filial, F1 generation.
While using the dihybrid corn cross, Mendel 's Law of Independent Assortment illustrated that four possible phenotypes form a 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio. For the single gene human traits experiment, we used the Hardy-Weinberg Theorem and equation to find the allele frequencies. For the experiment with Drosophila melanogaster we examined a fruit fly cross between red-eyed males and white-eyed females. We determined that this trait is sex-linked when the offspring were red-eyed females and white-eyed males. Throughout the genetics lab each purpose was determined and explained. A lot was learned about Mendel, genetics, and the hereditary process that makes us who we are today.

Cited Literature

Campbell, N.A. 1996. Biology. The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Co., New York, pp.
238- 279.

Corcos, Alain F. and Floyd V. Monaghan. 1993. Gregor Mendel 's Experiments on
Plant Hybrids. Rutgers University Press, New Jersey, pp. 45-46, 76,
105-112, 133.

Davis, M. 1996. Genetics. LBS 144 Laboratory Manual. The Lyman Briggs School,
Michigan State University, East Lansing, pp. 25-36.

Cited: Literature Campbell, N.A. 1996. Biology. The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Co., New York, pp. 238- 279. Corcos, Alain F. and Floyd V. Monaghan. 1993. Gregor Mendel 's Experiments on Plant Hybrids. Rutgers University Press, New Jersey, pp. 45-46, 76, 105-112, 133. Davis, M. 1996. Genetics. LBS 144 Laboratory Manual. The Lyman Briggs School, Michigan State University, East Lansing, pp. 25-36.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In addition to wild-type flies, 29 different mutations of the common fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, are included in FlyLab. The 29 mutations are actual known mutations in Drosophila. These mutations create phenotypic changes in bristle shape, body color, antennae shape, eye color, eye shape, wing size, wing shape, wing vein structure, and wing angle. For the purposes of the simulation, genetic inheritance in FlyLab follows Mendelian principles of complete dominance. Examples of incomplete dominance are not demonstrated with this simulation. A table of the mutant phenotypes available in FlyLab can be viewed by clicking on the Genetic Abbreviations tab which appears at the top of the FlyLab homepage. When you select a particular phenotype, you are not provided with any information about the dominance or recessiveness of each mutation. FlyLab will select a fly that is homozygous for the particular mutation that you choose, unless a mutation is lethal in the homozygous condition in which case the fly chosen will be heterozygous. Two of your challenges will be to determine the zygosity of each fly in your cross and to determine the effects of each allele by analyzing the offspring from your…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    25.) When Thomas Hunt Morgan crossed his red-eyed F1 generation flies to each other, the F2 generation included both red and white-eyed flies. Remarkably, all the white-eyed flies were male. What was the explanation for this result?…

    • 495 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fruit Fly Lab Report

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This lab was the study of monohybrid as well as dihybrid crosses. A monohybrid cross is the study of a certain trait whereas a dihybrid cross is the study of the mating experiment between two organisms that are identically hybrid for two traits. ( Reference 1 ) This lab was done to determine the genetic mutations after each generation and to observe the ratios. As each generation of fruit flies came to existence, traits would either be different from each fly or certain traits would disappear from existence. The expected ratio for a monohybrid cross was 3:1 and 9:3:3:1 for the dihybrid cross. For the monohybrid cross, eye color was observed to be wildtype, dark red, or white eyed, which was x-linked. (Reference 2) As for the dihybrid cross, both wing shape as well as eye color was observed. The wings were either straight, wildtype, or shriveled, vestigial, depending on…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A) If all of the yellow (albino) seedlings were removed from the population, would the next generation still have a chance of displaying the albino phenotype? Explain your answer.…

    • 350 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reciprocal cross, the behavioural phenotypes were isolated from one another while the wing veins were kept constant (in this case both wild type). When the wild type mellow female Drosophila and wild type hyper male Drosophila were crossed, all female offspring obtained a similar phenotype to that of the male parental while all the male offspring had phenotypical combinations similar to that of the female parent. This set of results shows that the mellow behavioral phenotype is a recessive x-linked gene carried by the female because the resulting male offspring showed the same characteristics to that of the female parent (received X – chromosome from female parent). On an additional note, there was a higher frequency of females in comparison to men; 121 and 105 respectively. In addition, the behavioral gene is sex -linked also because of the different resulting phenotypical ratio in comparison to the cross carried out in vial one.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fruit Fly Lab Report

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of this experiment was to determine the F1 genotype of fruit fly traits using the phenotypic ratio of the F2 generation and to express these results of the unknown cross through a Chi-square model and Mendelian genetics. After the experiment, it was found that the parents held a heterozygous genotype through using the Chi-square model, and that the observed and expected values fall within the Chi-squared value which also falls into the p-value. The Chi-squared value was 5.64, the degrees of freedom was 3 and the p-value was between .05 and .2, which supports the failing to reject the null hypothesis. The results also yielded the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio showing how different alleles combine and which ones are most prevalent. Using…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fruit Fly Lab Report

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    These flies were observed in the lab by anaesthetizing them with triethylamine so they won’t fly away. They were then inserted in a vial with a foam stopper so then it was easier to observe them. A dissecting microscope was used to identify the color of their bodies, wing shape, sex characteristics, and any other body characteristics. We used female fruit flies who were virgins six hours after they came out of their cocoons and mated them with male fruit flies. This is how crosses were made while there were a few Genetic…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher. 1988…

    • 7594 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Edwards, R. (2013). GM expert warns of cancer risk from crops. Sunday Herald. 16 February…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Analysis of diversity among cytoplasmic male sterile sources and their utilization in developing F1 hybrids in Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (R.) Br]…

    • 5522 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    research on gmo

    • 9970 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Consumers are not being given full information on food labels about whether the product they are buying has been processed with genetically modified organisms, the Green Party says.…

    • 9970 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Building on Mendel's work, Morgan found that the fly's eye color is transmitted on the X chromosome a red eye is dominant and a…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GMOs are genetically modified organisms, in short. To expand, these organisms have had their genetic material (legitimately, pieces of their DNA) altered to a point that is a polar opposite of what would naturally occur in nature if it had not been used for this purpose. This act of altering DNA occurs in a laboratory, performed by genetic engineers. These said engineers take the organism in which they would like to alter and insert one (or more, in some cases) new pieces of DNA into the desired organism. Companies who sell food with genetically modified organisms tend to tell their public that the purpose for incorporating these organisms into their food is to replace it with proteins that are specifically designed to ward off insects that try to eat the crop, therefore making the value of their product go done, and with that, their profits.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Effects of Genetic Engineering on Agriculture Agribiotechnology is the study of making altered agricultural products. Agribusiness is trying to alter the genes of already existing products to try to enhance the biocompetitiveness and adaptability of crops by enhancing plant resistance to drought, salinity, disease, pests and herbicides. They are going to try to enhance their growth, productivity, nutrient value, and chemical composition. The old way of doing this was through selective breeding, special fertilizer, and hormones. This seems now somewhat outdated with today’s technology. Genetic engineering comes with many downfalls. Increased production through genetic engineering could exhaust nonrenewable resources more rapidly and fail to feed a larger and more dependent human population. In Africa, and South and Central America, super breeds of crops, irrigation and hydroelectric dams, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and agripoisons exported to less developed countries produced great short-term profits but destroyed already existing, more regenerative, traditional farming practices, ultimately destroying the communities and fragile land. Natural deserts, swamps and salt marshes need to be preserved to protect biodiversity and the integrity of the Earth’s ecology. Introducing genetically engineered organisms into the environment means that these areas could be invaded by these new species therefore furthering loss of natural ecosystems. A major concern of farmers and scientists regarding engineered crops is that they are afraid that these new plants which would be resistant to herbicides and other chemicals would breed with a nearby weedy relative and thus creating a superweed that would be resistant to herbicides. These plants would then choke out the crops. Another example of this would be with Pseudomonas syringae. This is a common bacterium on plants that causes frost to form on them. The lipoprotein…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genetically modified crops is as known as (GM crops) is a crops that the DNA that been change by humans that using a techniques called “genetic engineering”. Genetically modified crops is the source of used in the research to produce more useful and better crops. Genetic engineering is a precise techniques which manipulate the plants in order to combine the genes from another organism to achieve the condition such as it last longer, disease resistance and it has diffrent colors/shapes. Genetically modified food(GM food) genetically been modified by using the modern biotechnology techniques.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays