Instead it claims that all organisms were created as their own species from the beginning. In brief, the book of genesis tells the story of how God created the universe in six days. No matter how unfathomable this may be to the scientific mind, it is a well-known point that the bible is the word of God and God is never wrong. Given this information, it is not reasonable for us to consider the book of genesis as truth, since it lacks empirical evidence. Even if God is never wrong there is no evidence to prove God’s existence and role on the creation of the universe. Now, I am not claiming that the book of genesis is wrong. Since we are presented with two creation stories, one significantly supported by empirical evidence and the other supported by the divine word of God, the creation story supported by empirical evidence is more promising. However, depending on your values and faith in God you may determine that the book of genesis is more …show more content…
The most controversial aspect in both is about how humans came to life. Was it because they were created after the image of God or because they evolved from primates? Like any other journey for the truth, we must approach this question with skepticism. Unfortunately, the Bible does not provide sufficient empirical evidence to compare it to the theory of evolution. If we assume that the book of genesis is the absolute truth, then that would make most of our scientific knowledge meaningless since a lot of it contradicts what is said in the Bible. Instead of examining the Bible literally and using it against science, we should interpret the Bible metaphorically to let us guide our