Gender Roles in Children's Literature: An Analysis of Walt Disney's Cinderella
Sex Roles (2007) 56:717–727
DOI 10.1007/s11199-007-9236-y
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Production of Meaning through Peer Interaction:
Children and Walt Disney’s Cinderella
Lori Baker-Sperry
Published online: 5 June 2007
# Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007
Abstract For many years researchers have understood that gender roles in children’s literature have the capacity to create and reinforce “meanings” of femininity and masculinity
(Currie, Gend. Soc., 11: 453–477, 1997; Gledhill, Genre and gender: The case of soap opera. In S. Hall (Ed.),
Representation (pp. 339–383). London: Sage, 1985; Tatar,
Off with their heads!: Fairy tales and the culture of childhood. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993;
Zipes, Happily ever after. New York: Routledge, 1997). The purpose of this study was to investigate children’s interpretation of a popular gendered fairy tale at the level of peer interaction. Walt Disney’s Cinderella was used in elementary school reading groups to investigate the ways that children understand messages regarding gender and the influence of peer culture on the production of meaning. The findings indicate that gender and gendered expectations were essential to the process of interpretation and the construction of meaning for the children. Gender unified the boys and girls into two distinct groups, particularly around the “girls’ book,”
Cinderella. Gender was reinforced along traditional lines in the peer group, serving as a deterrent to the production of alternate interpretations to traditional messages in the text.
Keywords Gender . Peer interaction . Children . Agency .
Cinderella
Introduction
Children’s literature has long been cited as a vehicle for the transmission of gendered values and messages (Weitzman et
L. Baker-Sperry (*)
Department of Women’s Studies, Western Illinois University,
500 Currens Hall,
Macomb, IL 61455, USA e-mail: L-Baker-Sperry@wiu.edu
al. 1972; Agee 1993; Zipes 1997).
DOI 10.1007/s11199-007-9236-y
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Production of Meaning through Peer Interaction:
Children and Walt Disney’s Cinderella
Lori Baker-Sperry
Published online: 5 June 2007
# Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007
Abstract For many years researchers have understood that gender roles in children’s literature have the capacity to create and reinforce “meanings” of femininity and masculinity
(Currie, Gend. Soc., 11: 453–477, 1997; Gledhill, Genre and gender: The case of soap opera. In S. Hall (Ed.),
Representation (pp. 339–383). London: Sage, 1985; Tatar,
Off with their heads!: Fairy tales and the culture of childhood. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993;
Zipes, Happily ever after. New York: Routledge, 1997). The purpose of this study was to investigate children’s interpretation of a popular gendered fairy tale at the level of peer interaction. Walt Disney’s Cinderella was used in elementary school reading groups to investigate the ways that children understand messages regarding gender and the influence of peer culture on the production of meaning. The findings indicate that gender and gendered expectations were essential to the process of interpretation and the construction of meaning for the children. Gender unified the boys and girls into two distinct groups, particularly around the “girls’ book,”
Cinderella. Gender was reinforced along traditional lines in the peer group, serving as a deterrent to the production of alternate interpretations to traditional messages in the text.
Keywords Gender . Peer interaction . Children . Agency .
Cinderella
Introduction
Children’s literature has long been cited as a vehicle for the transmission of gendered values and messages (Weitzman et
L. Baker-Sperry (*)
Department of Women’s Studies, Western Illinois University,
500 Currens Hall,
Macomb, IL 61455, USA e-mail: L-Baker-Sperry@wiu.edu
al. 1972; Agee 1993; Zipes 1997).
References: Agee, J. M. (1993). Mothers and daughters: Gender-role socialization in two Newbery award books Aydt, H., & Corsaro, W. (2003). Differences in children’s construction of gender across culture Baker-Sperry, L., & Grauerholz, L. (2003). The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in children’s fairy tales. Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment. New York: Vintage Books. Corsaro, W. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in children’s peer cultures Corsaro, W. (1997). The sociology of childhood. Berkeley, CA: Pine Forge Press. Currie, D. (1997). Decoding femininity: Advertisements and their teenage readers Davies, B. (1990). Agency as a form of discursive practice: A classroom scene observed Davies, B. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender Disney, W. (1950). Cinderella [Film]. Burbank, CA: Walt Disney Studios. Disney, W. (1986). Cinderella. New York, NY: Western Publishing. Eder, D., & Corsaro, W. (1999). Ethnographic studies of children and youth Sex Roles (2007) 56:717–727 Gledhill, C Grauerholz, L., & Baker-Sperry, L. (2007). Feminist research in the public domain: Risks and recommendations Hibbard, D., & Buhrmester, D. (1998). The role of peers in the socialization of gender-related social interaction styles Milkie, M. (1994). Social world approach to cultural studies. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 354–381. Miller, P., Potts, R., Fung, H., Hoogstra, L., & Mintz, J. (1990). Pike, J., & Jennings., N. (2005). The effects of commercials on children’s perceptions of gender appropriate toy use Rodgers, R., & Hammerstein, O. (Producers) (1997). Cinderella [film] Shumway, D. (2003). Modern love: Romance, intimacy, and the marriage crisis Tatar, M. (1993). Off with their heads!: Fairy tales and the culture of childhood Thorne, B. (1997). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. U.S. Bureau of the Census (2000). Socioeconomic profile for the Macomb zip code area: 61455 (110th ed.) Weitzman, L., Eifler, D., Hokada, E., & Ross, C. (1972). Sex role socialization in picture books for preschool children Journal of Sociology, 77, 1125–1150. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151. Zipes, J. (1997). Happily ever after. New York: Routledge.