Gender Peace And Security And The Post 
EGM/MDG/EP.2
October 2013
ENGLISH ONLY
______________________________________________________________________________
UN Women
In collaboration with ECLAC
Expert Group Meeting
Structural and policy constraints in achieving the MDGs for women and girls
___________________________
Mexico City, Mexico
21-24 October 2013
Gender, peace and security and the post-2015 framework1
Expert paper prepared by:
Hannah Wright
Saferworld
United Kingdom
Over the past two decades, interest in the relationship between gender, peace and security has increased dramatically, manifested in new research agendas, policy debates and development programmes in conflict-affected countries. Perhaps the most high profile development has been the passage of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325 and subsequent resolutions2 on women, peace and security, and the growing movement of civil society activists advocating for their implementation. However, although debates on the shape of the post-2015 development framework include strong calls for goals on both gender equality and peace and security, few actors have explored the links between the two and asked what these may mean for the content of the framework.
Similarly, while advocates for the women, peace and security agenda call for concrete action by governments to realise its aims, little attention has been paid to whether and how the post-2015 framework may provide a vehicle for making progress on this agenda. This paper aims to respond to that challenge.
Connecting gender and conflict
A number of studies have found a strong statistical correlation between countries’ peacefulness and their levels of gender equality.3 What is unclear from this evidence is the nature of this relationship:
1
The points set out in this paper will be further elaborated in a briefing by Saferworld and Conciliation Resources, due for publication in October 2013. This paper uses ‘women, peace and security’ when referring to the UN agenda, and
‘gender, peace and
October 2013
ENGLISH ONLY
______________________________________________________________________________
UN Women
In collaboration with ECLAC
Expert Group Meeting
Structural and policy constraints in achieving the MDGs for women and girls
___________________________
Mexico City, Mexico
21-24 October 2013
Gender, peace and security and the post-2015 framework1
Expert paper prepared by:
Hannah Wright
Saferworld
United Kingdom
Over the past two decades, interest in the relationship between gender, peace and security has increased dramatically, manifested in new research agendas, policy debates and development programmes in conflict-affected countries. Perhaps the most high profile development has been the passage of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325 and subsequent resolutions2 on women, peace and security, and the growing movement of civil society activists advocating for their implementation. However, although debates on the shape of the post-2015 development framework include strong calls for goals on both gender equality and peace and security, few actors have explored the links between the two and asked what these may mean for the content of the framework.
Similarly, while advocates for the women, peace and security agenda call for concrete action by governments to realise its aims, little attention has been paid to whether and how the post-2015 framework may provide a vehicle for making progress on this agenda. This paper aims to respond to that challenge.
Connecting gender and conflict
A number of studies have found a strong statistical correlation between countries’ peacefulness and their levels of gender equality.3 What is unclear from this evidence is the nature of this relationship:
1
The points set out in this paper will be further elaborated in a briefing by Saferworld and Conciliation Resources, due for publication in October 2013. This paper uses ‘women, peace and security’ when referring to the UN agenda, and
‘gender, peace and
References: Barker, G., Contreras, J.M., Heilman, B., Singh, A.K., Verma, R.K, and Nascimento, M. (2011). Bouta, T. Frerks, G. and Bannon, I. (2005). Gender, conflict, and development. Washington DC: World Bank. Breines, I., Connell, R. and Eide, I. (2000). Male roles, masculinities and violence: a culture of peace perspective Brinkman, H., Attree, L. and Hezir, S. (2013). Addressing horizontal inequalities as drivers of conflict in the post-2015 development agenda Caprioli, M. (2000). ‘Gendered conflict’. Journal of Peace Research, 37(1), 51-68. Sage Publications. Caprioli, M. (2005). ‘Primed for violence: the role of gender inequality in predicting internal conflict’ Carpenter, R. C. (2006). ‘Recognising gender-based violence against civilian men and boys in conflict situations’, Security Dialogue, 37(1), 83-103 Geneva Declaration Secretariat. (2008). Global burden of armed violence. Global Network of Women Peacebuilders. (2012). Women count. Security Council Resolution 1325: civil society monitoring report 2012 Heise, L. (2011). What works to prevent partner violence? An evidence overview. Report for the UK Department of International Development Institute for Economics and Peace. (2011). Structures of peace: identifying what leads to peaceful societies Institute for Economics and Peace. (2013). Pillars of peace: understanding the key attitudes and institutions that underpin peaceful societies. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2012). Women in politics 2012. International Labour Organisation. (2006). Red shoes: experience of girl combatants in Liberia. Klot, J. (2002). ‘Women and peace processes – an impossible match?’. In Louise Olsson (ed.) Gender Processes – an Impossible Match? Melander, E. (2005). ‘Gender equality and intrastate armed conflict’. International Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 695-714 OECD. (2009). Armed violence reduction: enabling development. Development Assistance Committee Ormhaug, C., Meier, P. and Hernes, H. (2009). Armed conflict deaths disaggregated by gender. Oxfam (2013), Challenges to security, livelihoods and gender justice in South Sudan. http://policypractice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/challenges-to-security-livelihoods-and-gender-justice-in-southsudan-the-situat-271995. Partners for Prevention. (2013). Why do some men use violence and how can we prevent it? Quantitative findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence Rehn, E. and Sirleaf, E. J. (2002). Women, war and peace: the independent expert’s assessment on the impact of armed conflict on women and women’s role in peacebuilding Saferworld. (2010). Common ground? Gendered assessment of the needs and concerns of Maoist Army combatants for rehabilitation and integration Saferworld. (2012). People’s peacemaking perspectives in South Sudan. Saferworld. (2012). Approaching post-2015 from a peace perspective. Saferworld. (2012). The impact of conflict and violence on achieving development. Small Arms Survey. (2010). Symptoms and causes: insecurity and underdevelopment in Eastern Equatoria UN High Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. (2013). A new global partnership: eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda. (2012). Peace and security thematic think piece. UN Women. (2011). Progress of the world’s women: in pursuit of justice. New York: UN Women. UN Women. (2012). Women working for recovery: the impact of female employment on family and community welfare after conflict. UN Women. (2012). Gender, conflict and the post-2015 development framework. Draft briefing. UN Women. (2013). A transformative standalone goal on achieving gender equality, women’s rights and women’s empowerment: imperatives and key components United States Institute of Peace. (2011) Dowry and division: youth and state building in South Sudan. VSO. (2013). Women in power: beyond access to influence in a post-2015 world.