Preview

Gay Marriage Pros And Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1982 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gay Marriage Pros And Cons
The Supreme Court is set to confront the issue of gay marriage for the first time in 40 years in two cases set for argument in late March. Same-sex couples are asking the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state just six months after a court ruled that preventing gays and lesbians from marrying was unconstitutional. In a second case, a New York City widow is urging the court to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which limits federal benefits for same-sex couples. Edith Windsor had to pay a $363,000 federal tax bill on her late wife's estate that would not have been levied on an opposite-sex spouse. The Obama administration says both laws are unconstitutional. House Republicans …show more content…
Kennedy widely seen as having the pivotal vote on the nine-member bench.The Supreme Court is set to confront the issue of gay marriage for the first time in 40 years in two cases set for argument in late March. Same-sex couples are asking the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state just six months after a court ruled that preventing gays and lesbians from marrying was unconstitutional. In a second case, a New York City widow is urging the court to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which limits federal benefits for same-sex couples. Edith Windsor had to pay a $363,000 federal tax bill on her late wife's estate that would not have been levied on an opposite-sex spouse. The Obama administration says both laws are unconstitutional. House Republicans stepped into the Windsor case to defend DOMA. Court watchers say the justices are likely to be closely divided along conservative-liberal lines, with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy widely seen as having the pivotal vote on the nine-member bench.The Supreme Court is set to confront the issue of gay marriage for the first time in 40 years in two cases set for argument in late …show more content…
Same-sex couples are asking the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state just six months after a court ruled that preventing gays and lesbians from marrying was unconstitutional. In a second case, a New York City widow is urging the court to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which limits federal benefits for same-sex couples. Edith Windsor had to pay a $363,000 federal tax bill on her late wife's estate that would not have been levied on an opposite-sex spouse. The Obama administration says both laws are unconstitutional. House Republicans stepped into the Windsor case to defend DOMA. Court watchers say the justices are likely to be closely divided along conservative-liberal lines, with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy widely seen as having the pivotal vote on the nine-member bench.The Supreme Court is set to confront the issue of gay marriage for the first time in 40 years in two cases set for argument in late March. Same-sex couples are asking the justices to strike down California's Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state just six months after a court ruled that preventing gays and lesbians from marrying was unconstitutional. In a second case, a New York City widow is urging the court to strike down the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which limits

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Edith Windsor: Case Study

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Edith Windsor the woman who made history on June 26th, 2013 fought the Supreme Court claiming that Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. Edith and her partner Thea Spyer were together for 40 years and married in 2007. After her partner died in 2009, she could not receive the same benefits that a opposite sex couple could and was told to pay $363,000 in estate taxes. With DOMA, Edith was not considered a spouse by the federal government and this made her ineligible to receive the tax benefits of a married couple. The federal tax code recognizes that it is unfair to tax spouses when property is received upon death. Also some states have a benefit that exempts Property Tax upon a spouse 's death. Which in a heterosexual marriage if a spouse passes the property is just passed along as without paying estate taxes. Edith spent an estimated $600,000 to pay the state and federal taxes to receive her partners’ home. This injustice made her fight for her rights which brought the case of the United States v. Windsor. Her courage has opened new doors for same sex partners.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    DOMA Ruling Case Study

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DOMA caused the federal government to not recognize gay marriages. This meant gay and lesbian partners of federal employees did not receive federal health insurance,…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), is a case about a same-sex couple that was married in 2007 in Ontario, Canada because at that time same-sex marriage was not legal in New York. The same-sex couple, Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer resided in New York. Two years after the couple was married, Spyer died, and left all of her estate to her wife, Windsor. When Windsor went to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, she was denied because of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which excluded same-sex partners in definition of marriage and spouse. Windsor went on with the issue, paid estate taxes over $300,000, but Window was denied the refund. She then challenged DOMA saying Section 3 was unconstitutional. After a few years with the case working its way through the courts, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was unconstitutional.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages. James Obergefell (plaintiffs) in each case argued that the states statutes violated Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights act. In all the cases, the trial court found in favor of the plaintiffs. The U.S Courts of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reverse and held that the states bans on same sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violated the couples fourteenth amendment rights to equal protection and due process.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the U.S government recognized their marriage, the estate would have qualified for the spousal exemption and Windsor would not have had to pay any taxes. Windsor started this lawsuit seeking a full refund of the federal estate tax. Also, Windsor proclaimed that DOMA’s Section 3 is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment. The issue here is whether the Defense of Marriage Act violates the right to equal protection of same-sex couples who are legally married under…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the other hand, it is also a homosexuals human and moral rights. Every homosexual has the right to be jubilant in the same way that heterosexuals are. Each individual has their own morals, although some may not agree. A USC Aiken senior, Micah Hurtt, says, "Some people cannot separate the religious aspect. It is not a matter of religious right or wrong morals; it is inequality." Even though heterosexuals have different morals, homosexuals still have the right to be…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996, the Supreme Court enacted The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which the third section defined the words marriage and spouse to refer to the legal joining of a man and a woman. This would legally bar any same-sex couples from receiving legal…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) had a case brought before them on April 28th, 2015 named Obergefell v.Hodges (Maureen-Johnston. 2017). The case was presented by groups of same-sex couples wanting to bring forward the issue of marriage equality. Their argument was the under the 14th amendment, that the ban of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. "Obergefell v. Hodges." the 14th amendment states…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “While remaining pro-marriage, some would argue that divorce can, unfortunately, be the best of two bad alternatives” (Balswick & Balswick, 2014, p. 309)…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    California Proposition 8 (California Marriage Protection Act) was a state-wide ballot proposition passed in the November 4, 2008 state election that made same sex marriage illegal in California. The vote which won by 52% adds exactly 14 words to the California State Constitution, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." To qualify for the ballot, Proposition 8 needed 694,354 valid petition signatures, equal to 8% of the total votes cast for governor in the November 2006 General Election. The initiative proponents submitted 1,120,801 signatures, and on June 2, 2008, the initiative qualified for the November 4, 2008 election ballot through the random sample signature check. The passage of Prop 8 was a major victory for religious conservatives seeking to ban gay marriage in other states, and a crippling setback for the gay rights movement nationwide.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The same-sax marriage was a disputed topic that everyone would like to speak, but no any political will or popular sentiment for it until recently. In the case United States v. Windsor, the United States Supreme Court declared that same-sex couples are recognized by federal law and can receive federal benefits which the estate would have qualified for a marital exemption, and no taxes would have been imposed. Edith Windsor, who married to Thea Clara Spyer in Canada in 2007, after she lost her spouse in 2009, she could not be entitled to the estate tax benefits because they were same-sex couple. Even though their marriage was recognized by New York state law, she still had to pay $363,000 estate tax if she wanted to inherit her spouse’s house…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two cases before the United States Supreme Court challenge both Congress’s traditional definition of marriage in DOMA and California’s traditional definition in its Proposition 8. The central question before the court in each…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell Case Summary

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Obergefell decision is a landmark case that deals with a much greater debate than just that of the legality of same-sex marriage. The majority opinion of the court ruled in favor of the guaranteed right to marriage in every U.S. state regardless of the sex of the individuals involved. While the advancement of liberal social rights is evident in this opinion, the ruling, perhaps more importantly, confronts the struggle between the dissenting views of the nature of Constitutional revision. Through the Obergefell majority opinion and Scalia’s dissent, we see a profound and necessary debate regarding how to treat our nation’s founding document moving forward.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays