Preview

Gampero's Case Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gampero's Case Analysis
If I was the judge presiding over Gampero's case I would have acted professional, and honorable. Judge force Charles Gampero J.R into accepting a plea bargain by using his position over the courtroom to influence his choice. I would have not told a man if he was found guilty, I would give him the maximum sentenced of 25 years. United States of America is innocent before guilty, and judge Francis Egitto demonstrate behavior that was unconstitutional. In my opinion, I would have not assume the man was guilty, but innocence because as a judge I took a oath to be a servant of the courtroom. Additionally, individuals such as judges must take a neutral stand against information, until it has been proven in court. This to me is truly a professional,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Greg Gieseman Case Analysis
    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Greg Gieseman Case Analysis

    Ambitious, compassionate, and diligent with an eye for innovation Greg Giesemen, President and Chief Executive Officer for Community First Health Plans (CFHP), is unstoppable. With a Master of Business Administration from Loyola College and a Bachelor of Science in Chemistry form Towson University there is no denying Giesemen’s diligence and intelligence. With over 30 years of experience in health plan, health delivery, and benefit administration Gieseman has amassed a strong track record for developing and implementing utilization management, reporting, and reimbursement systems that improve both financial performance and consumer satisfaction. Gieseman, as CEO of CFHP, is responsible for managing all of their ongoing operations. From establishing…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lack Of Professionalism: The Michael Brown And Eric Garner Cases
    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lack Of Professionalism: The Michael Brown And Eric Garner Cases

    A good example of the lack of professionalism with the grand jury are the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases, the grand jury’s decision not to prosecute syndicated police officers has placed the process in public scrutiny. In the arrest of Eric Garner and his tragic death for selling untaxed cigarettes. Officers tried to arrest him by using a chokehold and compressed his chest…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Laws 310 Week 5 Simulation
    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Laws 310 Week 5 Simulation

    The case between Ms. Darcy Vs Big Car Company, I would have to agree 100% with what the Jugde decided to do. Based on the facts that were present, I would have ruled that this move onto trial in front of Jury of our peers as well. While Ms. Darcy was under the direct supervision of Clarence he was rude and forth coming with is attitude towards Ms. Darcy which was presented in lewd and harassing manner. With the many attempts that Ms. Darcy had towards Clarence he would continue to gesture and run into her in very threatening manner and making an hostile work environment for Ms. Darcy.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Analysis
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Case Analysis

    Jim Donovan has recently accepted a new position as president for the company Famous Products. He has been asked to fly in to Milwaukee to take a look at the facilities and meet with the former president Don Bird. Jim is so excited and confident about his new position that he doesn’t think twice about his meeting with Bird. Upon his arrival Bird welcomed Jim to the building then brought him into a huge conference room where a bunch of other men in business suits sat. Bird made it openly clear he was not pleased that Jim would be taking over in front of everyone; this was obviously a huge shock to Jim. Jim was not prepared at all for Bird to react this way, we will discuss the mistakes Jim made before he got to the appointment, Jim’s reactions and what he should do during and after the meeting.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gender's Role In The Judge Manning Case
    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gender's Role In The Judge Manning Case

    Judge Manning’s demeanor towards the defendant was a bit shocking when looking at the crimes the defendant committed. At times the defendant began to cry or get sad, and the judge seem to show sympathy for him. He would ask him if he needed a break from standing or just to take a moment to himself. He showed concern for the defendant. When Judge Manning began reading each indictment, he made sure to pronounce each victims name correctly by asking the prosecutors did he pronounce them correctly, every time he had a hard time pronouncing foreign names. Judge Manning also out of kept informing the defendant that this would take a while and asked him to be patient several times. I’m not exactly sure if gender played a role in this case, though…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Analysis 1
    • 525 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Case Analysis 1

    Firstly, Alejandro’s team members did not view him as an authentic leader. They had no respect for or confidence in him probably because they sensed his self doubt so they disregarded his plan and did not pay attention. Secondly, Dan answered his phone and left for his weekly tennis game which everyone seemed to know about except Alejandro. As soon as the other team members saw that Dan wasn’t interested enough to participate in the meeting, they also lost all interest and followed through with the disrespect because they viewed Alejandro’s plan as just another idea so they began to come up with a plan of their own. Alejandro’s first mistake was that he had no confidence in himself. For example, when Dan initially assigns him with the task, he began to doubt himself and questions the reasons why Dan chose him rather than the “old hands” with more experience. This shows that he wasn’t aware of his strengths and weaknesses so he was unable to present his plan effectively and confidently. Additionally, Alejandro failed to get the other managers involved in his plan to help motivate the other team members.…

    • 525 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juror # 8: A Criminal Case Study
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    Juror # 8: A Criminal Case Study

    If I was the 18 year old being convicted I would have not liked Juror #8 to use actual evidence and ethical judgement because the evidence provided makes it seem like I did it. For example, the knife provided and the witness would be a major weapon to find me guilty or not. On the other hand, I would have not chosen another juror to make the final decision on my conviction because the others jumped the conclusions too quick and did not think it through how juror #8 did. He looked at every detail and looked at it in different point of views.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Case Analysis Paper
    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Final Case Analysis Paper

    housing might have on smaller businesses that rely on Disneyland for their main income will be…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    case analysis
    • 2337 Words
    • 12 Pages

    case analysis

    b.What are the amounts and timing of the acquisition investment’s free cash flow from 2013 through 2022?…

    • 2337 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Hart's Confessions Be Admissible?
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Hart's Confessions Be Admissible?

    This leads us back to the analysis of whether or not to Hart’s confessions should be admissible, there are similar reasoning, but slightly varying answers amongst the Justices. It was agreed that the confession Hart made at the scene of the crime and to Mr. Big should be inadmissible. Yet, in regards to the confession made to the undercover officer, there were differing opinions. The two prominent ones being that after considering a prong by prong analysis of the confessions based on the probative verses prejudicial value that that confession should be determined at a new trial. Or that the confession should be dismissed based on the implied social and financial inducement. I completely agree with those who wanted to dismiss Hart’s confessions to Mr. Big and the confession he made at the scene of the crime. Based on the prejudicial influence…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    12 Angry Men

    1.How do you think you might have acted as a juror in this case ? How would you had interacted ?…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Instructions: A Narrative Analysis
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jury Instructions: A Narrative Analysis

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Latimer Mock Trial
    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Latimer Mock Trial

    The rules of criminal procedure are highly significant to the defendants because they are designed to guarantee the constitutional rights and freedoms to those individuals charged with an offence. They serve to truly protect the victims, and ensure the guilty are brought to justice. In criminal trials, individuals in the jury wielded real power in the trial since they settle the fate of their fellow citizens by determining the defense is whether they are guilty of some of the most horrendous crimes. Being a member of the jury, my predominant responsibility in the mock trial was listening to the evidence presented by the Crown and the defense carefully. The jury was expected to examine all the evidence deliberately and make judgement without any bias. In order to make the discussion about the trial confidential, the jury were adjourned to the outside of the room to make a decision. An unanimous was made by the jury in order for a verdict to be reached. In this mock trial, the jury decided that Latimer shall be given a sentence of seven years. This decision made by the jury reflects the values and standards of the general public that Latimer do not deserve a more severe sentence. By bringing ordinary citizens into the court and placing them at the very heart of the decision-making process, trial by jury has become the most democratic part of the legal system. Furthermore, I experienced that the court uses witness testimony in an attempt to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense. During cross-examination, the Crown and the defense asked questions trying to detect falsehood of the testimony or to destroy the credibility of the opponent’s witnesses. By asking questions connected to the witnesses’ characters, the defense…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Purpose Of The Grand Jury
    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Purpose Of The Grand Jury

    While often mistaken, it is not the responsibility of the Grand Jury to decide a guilt verdict. Their initiative is to ensure that due process is carried out and that the premise of probable cause is not dismissed for some of the more serious offenses. Although highly controlled by the prosecution, the Grand Jury is not to be tampered with or manipulated by the prosecution. Any attempt by the prosecutor to manipulate or malfeasance in the judicial system should be reported by the Grand Jury (Johnston, 1974, p. 160). It is this manipulation of this asset that can turn the Grand Jury into a (tool) for the prosecution instead of a patriot for justice.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis
    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Case Analysis

    Smiley, a buyer from Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique. The reason for his visit was to find out about the latest lines that Boulevard was carrying. Once Smiley entered the store he was recognized by Maldini, the store manager of Boulevard, who immediately called the store detective and told him to keep an eye on Smiley. Maldini then called the police, notifying them that he had a shoplifter in the store. Smiley never tried to leave, believing that Rocco, the store detective, would not permit him to do so. Once the police took Smiley to the station he explained the situation and was released.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More