Preview

Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1038 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium
Future of Nuclear Energy- Thorium According to the United Nations, we are expecting the world population to reach approximately nine billion in 2050. Because of this rapid increase in world population, humans have been looking for cheap, safe, and environmentally friendly energy sources to satisfy the population’s necessities. For the past few decades, the human population has been using coal, oil, and gas as our energy source, but we quickly found out that was not enough. One of the other popular energy sources is nuclear energy, as it is a non-carbon emitting and very efficient source of energy. However, catastrophic events such as the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine, Three Mile Island Accident in Pennsylvania, and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan, forced global leaders to re-evaluate the safety and future of uranium based nuclear energy. Is there an alternative nuclear reactor that is not only cheap but non-carbon emitting, and, most importantly, safe? Although many would argue there is no such thing, I believe nuclear reactors based on the radioactive element thorium promise the world a superior nuclear energy source, and a safe future for humanity.
One of the biggest advantages of thorium is that it cannot be used to produce nuclear weapons. While uranium could also be used to produce electricity, it is also used to produce nuclear weapons. While uranium is easily expandable, thorium, on the other hand, is extremely proliferation resistant. This huge feature will not only decrease poverty but also war. It will give global leaders the motivation to invest more wealth in their country, and seek resolutions with other countries through peace, not war. Having nuclear weapons may give a country more power, but in the long run, it will only create more hatred and potentially, more wars. Preventing wars will save countries from huge economic, social, and population losses in the future. If these countries invested more money into building thorium



Cited: Cooper, Nicolas, Daisuke Minakata, Miroslav Begovic, and John Crittenden. "Should We Consider Using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors for Power Generation?" Environmental Science & Technology 45.15 (2011): 6237-238. Web. "Thorium." Thorium. World Nuclear Association, Sept. 2014. Web. 11 Oct. 2014. <http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Thorium/>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans have always tried to find innovative, powerful and valid energy sources in order to be able to supply the several needs of modern societies. In this sense, nuclear power is considered one of the most controversial technologies related to the new millennium.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently the spotlight has been set on renewable energies to assist with weaning off of greenhouse gas emissions, solving issues with energy independence, and to exploit their inherent renewability. Unfortunately our technology is not quite up to speed economically with our wish to rely completely on renewable energy, thus many non-renewable energies are recognized as viable options to power our economy (Fraser, 2011). The United States’ current position on diversifying with non-renewables consists of oil, natural gas, coal, and the less spoken of, nuclear power. Nuclear power is the process by which a reactor contains a slow explosion called fission, which gives off a positive net amount of energy that can be harvested. Of course the social stigma around nuclear is so strong that even if there were an undiscovered completely safe type of nuclear power plant, justifying the complex science would be challenging. After events such as Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island, the vast majority of society believes nuclear energy is nothing more than a death wish. Contrary to popular belief, a safer alternative in nuclear energy has been discovered and has been gaining popularity over the past few years despite the recent tragedy in Japan (Sorensen, 2011). Though newly rekindled, the non-mainstream nuclear power known as Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) was discovered in the 1960’s and had been proved to be a very attractive option to the more popular Light Water Reactor (LWR). It all began with nuclear physicist Alvin Weinberg, who would graduate from the University of Chicago soon become research director at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). Weinberg was given the freedom to experiment with designing multiple types of nuclear reactors including the prominent LWR’s that are in commercial use today. Subsequently Weinberg had noted the potential danger of a LWR and moved on to designing a safer…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Only about 0.7% of uranium consists of the isotope U-235, the fuel source of nuclear reactors, but because the cooling process utilized by LWRs absorbs a significant number neutrons required for fission, nuclear fuel must be enriched to contain between 3% and 5% U-235. The enrichment process requires large amounts energy and could be avoided by using more efficient reactors which do not need enriched fuel (Barton). Not only would LFTRs and IFRs require non enriched fuel in order to operate, but they would also utilize the fuel to the fullest extent. LWRs are only capable of burning about .6% of U-235 in the fuel and the rest is “depleted” or “spent” fuel which is discarded as radioactive waste. Since LFTRs and IFRs are able to operate at much higher temperatures than LWRs, they can more thoroughly burn uranium and burn it more efficiently turning up to 85% of the heat into electricity as opposed the 30% of heat that LWRs turn into electricity (Hansen). LFTRs which will utilize thorium as a primary energy source will be able to produce over 30,000% more energy per megaton of fuel as the current method of burning uranium only amounts to about 35 GW*hr/MT while a LFTR would produce about 11,000 GW*hr/MT (Barton). Efficiency is a great advantage over the current generation of nuclear power plants, but…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have discovered countless energy sources, from fossil fuel combustion to nuclear fission and fusion, each of which have seemed to pose a different problem. Whether the problematic effect seems to be cost or carbon dioxide emission, renewable and nonrenewable resources have both seemed to come with a fair set of cons with their pros. Extensive research on the topic has shown that there seems to be no flawless source of energy extraction, however there certainly are sources that are relatively worse than others. This being said, nuclear energy, from the fusion and fission of radioactive elements, is one of the worst sources of energy because of its immense waste, danger to the general public, and large expenses.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thorium vs Oil

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page

    Using oil to fuel the world has started to become a huge issue to us and the environment. Some people believe that switching the resource that we depend on could cause mass disruption and many lost jobs. This may or not be true, but not changing from oil could cause even more devastation on our planet. The Liquid-Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR) could be a great replacement because it doesn’t produce greenhouse gas, its less dangerous than oil, and very little of it is wasted.…

    • 374 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sovacool, Benjamin K. “Nuclear Energy and Renewable Power: Which is the Best Climate Change Mitigation Option?” Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology 39: 758-762. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=40086266&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paul L. Joskow & John E. Parsons. “The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima”. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. (2012): 1-30.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the era of global climate change, and concerns about humanity's long-term reliance on fossil fuels, many think the solution lies in alternative sources of energy, including nuclear power. All our nuclear power plants are based on fission: splitting heavy atoms into lighter components in a controlled fashion. Though fission is safe when all goes well, the fuel is radioactive, waste disposal can be problematic, and as the Fukushima disaster showed there is a high cost to accidents.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power uses unstable elements like uranium. Uranium is constantly going through a process called nuclear decay, which means the atom is splitting apart over a period of time, measured in half-lives. This is why it is the element of choice for nuclear power plants. Uranium is special because it can go through what is called induced fission. Induced fission is when a free neutron is fired at an atom (like uranium). The atom will absorb the neutron, and immediately becomes unstable and splits apart. When the uranium atom splits, it will split into two separate atoms and expels two or three neutrons depending on how the atom splits. A single uranium atom, when going through induced fission, will release about 200 MeV (million electron volts). The atoms contained in one pound of uranium release as much energy as burning 1,000,000 gallons of gas. There are pros and cons of nuclear power, but is nuclear energy worth the risks?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the last century, nuclear power has been established as a reliable source of energy in the major industrialized countries. Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall. Although no new plants are scheduled to be built in the United States, nuclear power is growing to be a popular producer of power. It has recently enjoyed a revival in attention and research due to the environmental concerns surrounding current conventional energy sources. Issues of regulation and safety are at the forefront of all discussions involving nuclear power. (Lillington) One of the major concerns is the radioactive waste that is produced during the fission of uranium.…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear fission is used to produce the energy provided by nuclear reactors in nuclear power stations. There are over 400 power plants in more than 30 countries worldwide, 100 of which are situated in the United States. "The energy produced by these power stations generates 17% of the world's electricity." Nuclear fission reactors have proven to be a practical energy source, "the fission of an atom of uranium produces 10 million times the energy produced by the combustion of an atom of carbon from coal." It has been saving money and making effective use of uranium for years.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thorium

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For decades, scientists have dreamed about turning thorium an element that their atomic number is 90 and also is less radioactive and produces less nuclear waste than uranium. Making Thorium an alternative fuel for nuclear energy. Thorium is four times more common that uranium 235 and cannot produce meltdown like the two catastrophes on Chernobyl and Fukushima. The reason that thorium cannot cause a meltdown is because his chain reaction can be stopped naturally.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power In Australia

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This report will therefore create an argument for or against the uses of nuclear energy.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays