Preview

Function Role of Education - Sociology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3593 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Function Role of Education - Sociology
1. The function or role of education

Functionalists

Functionalists say it does 3 important things

• Teaches the skills needed for a job (so helps the economy) • Sorts the clever people from the thick for the right jobs (allocation function) • Is secondary socialisation (so helps people fit into society).

Durkheim said the last one is done by passing on norms and values and this continues shared values – a consensus. Thus we have social order.
Parsons adds that schools prepare children for the adult world too – and prepares them for the competition they face as adults since schools are competitive (you have to compete with others to do well).
Davis and Moore say we have to have unequal rewards (pay) to motivate the cleverer students to stay on in education to learn and to be willing to do the harder jobs.

Functionalists see society as a meritocracy – people get what they merit/deserve in jobs based on how well they’ve done in school.

Marxists
Marxists say education does 3 things too • Helps capitalism by teaching kids what they need to work for the capitalists • Justifies inequality because the working class kids fail exams and look ‘thick’ • Passes on beliefs that all is fair in society (passes on a ruling class ideology).

Althusser says it produces a docile and obedient workforce – they failed exams and accept they only deserve a poorly paid job. Class-based inequalities just carry on generation after generation because children grow up believing capitalism is normal, just and fair. Education is part of the ideological state apparatus m
Bowles and Gintis say at school kids learn to accept a hierarchy (people in charge of others) , they accept getting a reward for doing something boring, they get used to a ‘working day’ with a lunch break, and they learn you get rewarded for following the rules. All this prepares you to accept a boring job in capitalism.
Willis said not everyone accepts school – some kids cope by mucking about and they cope with a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marxists take a critical view of the role of education. Capitalist society is essentially a two-class system, with a ruling class exploiting the working class. Marxist see education as being run in the interests if the ruling class. For example, Althusser argues that education is an important ideological state apparatus that helps to control people’s ideas and beliefs. He suggests education has to purposes. It reproduces class inequalities through the generations by ensuring that most working-class pupils experience education failure. Education also legitimates this inequality, persuading the working class to accept educational and social inequalities. Other Marxists have also pointed to the existence of a hidden curriculum in schools.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociological Perspective

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firstly, functionalists believe that society is viewed as a “system of interconnected parts” that works collectively in order to sustain a sense of social balance within the world. For example, each of the social institutions is responsible for providing essential functions to society: Family is seen as accountable for “reproducing, nurturing and socialising children”, whereas education provides…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our achievement ideology is based on the idea that the U.S. is full of opportunity and anyone can accomplish success in our society if they work hard enough. Many grow up thinking education is the ladder that will allow for this social mobility and all you have to do is be willing to work hard enough to earn it. But what about children who grow up thinking differently? Why do some strive for high paying careers while others refuse school and are seemingly ok with staying working class? MacLeod challenges the notion that America is the land of opportunity with research he conducted while in college. He uses the research of several reproduction theorists to show that schools not only are not great equalizers, as most think, but actually reinforce social inequality.…

    • 9161 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some sociologists; such as Marxist agree with the statement above that education benefits the ruling class. One reason for this is that they believe that education brings about social class reproduction, to benefit them. This means that rich can afford to go to big successful private schools, and then go onto having successful jobs, whereas the poor will continue being poor, as they cannot afford to go to private schools and therefore will not achieve the same grades as the ruling class and will not get as well paid jobs. They believe that the working class do not achieve in education because of their material deprivation and…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists believe that all elements within a society interconnect and work together. They compare society to a human body where everything is useful and needed. Even things like crime have a purpose, which through Functionalists rose tinted glasses is that it creates jobs for policemen etc. It is a system used by cultures, which concentrate on, and emphasises the functional interactions of their societies, i.e. why and how certain rituals, daily chores etc. are performed. It makes "law-like" generalisations, which are employed to explain and predict social phenomena.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, Parsons says that school is the bridge between family and the wider society. Because in the family you are treated as an individual based upon particularistic traits whereas in society you are based on your merits. School is a blend between the two and allows a consensus of your merits and your personality. However, that blend is more between students and students than students and teachers. Teachers base students more on their merits, hence the meritocracy of school and the wider society as it is a quicker and easier way to assess people. This lead to the beginning of the education triage where pupils where 'streamed' into classes of varying difficulty…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists Bowles and Gintis (1976) suggested that there is a correspondence between educational institutions and the workplace- the working class will stay working class, and characteristics such as self-image, social class identification, demeanour and presentation, will be paralleled within the workplace. Bowles and Gintis also maintained that whilst in school, the teachers were formed in a hierarchical system in which older students seem to be of a higher status than those who are younger; in the workplace, not all workers will be on the same salary in the same department. The overall belief is that the whole system has made it so that the ‘hidden curriculum’ enforces social order, and it marginalises worker, making them struggle for power, and this will create a subservient pool of workers. Durkheim, would disagree along with Davis and Moore, and Parsons, who collectively state that a skilled workforce is a product, and occupational allocation can be a defining outcome of vocational education. This really drives the core values of functionalism, as it seeks to work for the benefit of a consensus society, just trying to get the people back into work and off of welfare.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Functionalist view that industrial capitalist societies are meritocracies and that every ones’ position in society is based on talent and hard work. Bowles and Gintis suggest ideas for why this is the case. They bases their theory around the idea of education being an ideological state apparatus. Bowles and Gintis’ theory is based on the ‘long shadow of work’ and the legitimating of inequality.
When speaking of the ‘long shadow of work’, Bowles and Gintis are referring to the strong relationship between social relationships at school and at work – they believe this helps education to play its major role in reproducing a labour force with hardworking, disciplined workers. Educations do this through the hidden curriculum and the correspondence theory. The hidden curriculum relates to many features of the workplace. An example of this would be that in school the hidden curriculum teaches students to abide by rules and accept punishment, this corresponds to the workplace where students would conform to rules and not argue with your boss. People believe that society and the education system is meritocratic. Bowles and Gintis believe this to be false, as in reality it is legitimating the inequalities that exist in society.
Althusser sees education as an ideological state apparatus. This is where the government issues ruling class ideas through different institutions, or apparatus, in this case education is the main apparatus. This is needed by capitalism to transmit the idea that the inequalities in society are justified as society is meritocratic. This helps capitalism by preparing students for their future jobs. The working class are taught to accept their future exploitation in the workplace. Where as the middle class are prepared for management roles supported by their qualifications.
However, these views from the Marxists are merely ideas and theories, as…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In sociology, functionalism is known as a structural theory. Functionalists see society as a whole being structured like the anatomy of a human body with many interconnected systems that function together to sustain a healthy body. Functionalists argue that in order to have a strong society, each individual must obey the social norms and standards of the society. Each person is socialized into obeying these “social norms” that are at the core that makes up the social structure. Society needs to convey social coherence and education plays a vital role in working to accomplish this.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Functionalist theory believes that society functions so that each individual plays a specific role. Their perspective of social inequality is the belief that "inequality is not only inevitable but also necessary for the smooth functioning of society." (Davis-Moore (1954) p. 214 chapter 8 Society In Our Times: The Essentials) Functionalists believe that all societies have important jobs and tasks that need to be carried out and that certain positions must be filled to do so. Functionalists also think that in order to attract people to both the important and less important roles there must be a variation in rewards that will motivate individuals to make the effort needed to gain the top positions within society, and that positions are rewarded based on the individuals abilities and credentials known as meritocracy. It appears that the view of social inequality as it would to the Functionalist perspective is greatly dependant on economic rewards and prestige as being the only motivators for people wanting to gain a higher position within society. They do not take into consideration that people may have been born into distressed circumstances and received below average education, making it impossible for them to maximize their skills and talents.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals of Public Education

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is difficult to attain the idyllic situation that “education would provide everyone with an equal chance to pursue wealth” (Spring, 2012, p. 57). Many social, economic, and political barriers exist to attaining this ideal objective. Joel Spring, author of the book Education and…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Functionalism as a theorist perspective in which us as a human race introduced by the famous Talott Parsons, are obligated to fit into a society in which we all contribute positively to achieve certain goals, we must also want to follow the structure of society which will enrich us with rewards such as an income of wage, a higher status in society better accommodation and better quality food. With Functionalism in place we as humans are to perfume our role in society which will enable the structure to run smoothly and continue to work, to maintain this structure we must also want to fit into what they consider to be the normal role, Being healthy by looking after ourselves in all aspects of life like maintaining a healthy balanced diet, this enables us to function properly so we can work and continue to function within the community.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to conflict theorists, the educational system preserves inequality because of the increasing tuition and degree requirements for professional positions that are ranked higher in terms of income and prestige. Students from disadvantaged families must depend on grants and huge loans if they intend to go for a professional degree that will bring a change in their social status and help them move from the working class to lower class, or to the middle class. Professions like doctors and surgeons are for students who come from affluent families who have huge savings to fund such expensive degrees, and even after making such huge investments, students are drowned in student loans for years and years. In today’s world, being intelligent, having a high IQ level and creativity are not enough to secure a high social status through education. One must come from a social status that is already high to maintain that status…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Functionalists believe everything serves a specific function in our society and these functions need to be understood. Everyone has a role to fill in this functional society, in other words we need to have stratification so as everyone has a purpose. Functionalists are very…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under pure socialism, classes become indistinguishable—if not nonexistent—due to its focus on equality. Although this may be preferable to the lives of the Industrial Revolution-era lower class, it ignores the human race’s competitive nature, taking key motivations away from the people needed to spur their society’s economy. Pure capitalism, on the other hand, recognizes this need for motivation, stating that when people are given economic freedom, “the obvious and simple system of natural liberty establishes itself of its own accord” (Smith). Despite the motivation that this system provides, it only serves to worsen the class inequality still present to this day. Because capitalist societies are barely under any government economic control, the most successful people continue to be just as successful, leaving the poorest with little to no chance of class mobility. Communism, like capitalism, attempts to provide motivation for its citizens. However, since communism is based mostly upon people being “instruments of labour” working for their societies (Marx and Engels), motivation for the sake of the individual becomes almost impossible. In place of this, communism attempts to provide a more community-focused motivation, but without monetary reward, the work can begin to seem…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays