Fulltext
Cornell University ILR School
DigitalCommons@ILR
CAHRS Working Paper Series
Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies
(CAHRS)
3-1-2005
The Role of Corporate HR Functions In
Multinational Corporations: The Interplay
Between Corporate, Regional/National And Plant
Level
Elaine Farndale
Erasmus University
Jaap Paauwe
Erasmus University
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp
Part of the Human Resources Management Commons
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS) at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in CAHRS Working Paper Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact jdd10@cornell.edu.
The Role of Corporate HR Functions In Multinational Corporations: The
Interplay Between Corporate, Regional/National And Plant Level
Abstract
The HR literature has been abundant in providing typologies of the roles of HR professionals in their organisation. These typologies are largely related to the changing nature of HRM over time, and the context in which empirical work was carried out. In this paper we focus on the context of the increasing internationalisation of firms and how this has an effect upon modern-day typologies of HR roles. We explore these roles by focusing on the way in which HRM practices come about. Especially in a MNC setting of increasing internationalisation of firms the issues of coordination, shared learning and standardisation versus leeway for adapting to the local context (customisation) are prominent. These issues present themselves both at the corporate and regional level and at the national and local (plant) level. On all these levels HR practitioners are active and find themselves amidst the interplay of both (de-)centralisation and standardisation versus customisation processes. This paper thus explores the way in which HR practices come into being and how they
DigitalCommons@ILR
CAHRS Working Paper Series
Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies
(CAHRS)
3-1-2005
The Role of Corporate HR Functions In
Multinational Corporations: The Interplay
Between Corporate, Regional/National And Plant
Level
Elaine Farndale
Erasmus University
Jaap Paauwe
Erasmus University
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp
Part of the Human Resources Management Commons
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies (CAHRS) at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in CAHRS Working Paper Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact jdd10@cornell.edu.
The Role of Corporate HR Functions In Multinational Corporations: The
Interplay Between Corporate, Regional/National And Plant Level
Abstract
The HR literature has been abundant in providing typologies of the roles of HR professionals in their organisation. These typologies are largely related to the changing nature of HRM over time, and the context in which empirical work was carried out. In this paper we focus on the context of the increasing internationalisation of firms and how this has an effect upon modern-day typologies of HR roles. We explore these roles by focusing on the way in which HRM practices come about. Especially in a MNC setting of increasing internationalisation of firms the issues of coordination, shared learning and standardisation versus leeway for adapting to the local context (customisation) are prominent. These issues present themselves both at the corporate and regional level and at the national and local (plant) level. On all these levels HR practitioners are active and find themselves amidst the interplay of both (de-)centralisation and standardisation versus customisation processes. This paper thus explores the way in which HR practices come into being and how they
References: Almond, P., Edwards, T., & Clark, I. 2003. Multinationals and changing national business systems in Europe: towards the 'shareholder value ' model? Industrial Relations Arkin, A. 1999. Return to centre. People Management, 6 May: 34. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: the transnational solution. Bird, A., & Beechler, S. 1995. Links between business strategy and human resource management strategy in US-based Japanese subsidiaries: an empirical investigation. Bjorkman, Ingmar. 2003. The roles played by the HR function in large-scale mergers and acquisitions: the case of Nordea Caldwell, R. 2003. The changing roles of personnel managers: old ambiguities, new uncertainties Carroll, Stephen J. 1991. The new HRM roles, responsibilities, and structures. Managing human resources in the information age Dicken, P. 2003. Transnational corporations. In P. Dicken (Ed.) Global shift: reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century (4th ed.): 212-237 Evans, Alastair, and Alan Cowling. 1985. Personnel 's part in organisation restructuring. Evans, P, Pucik, V and Barsoux, J. 2002. The global challenge. Frameworks for International Human Resource Management Ferner, A. 1997. Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal, 7(1): 19-37. Gooderham, P. N., & Nordhaug, O. 2003. International management: cross-boundary challenges Guest, D E. 1990. Human resource management and the American dream. Journal of Management Studies 27, no Guest, David E. 1991. Personnel management: the end of orthodoxy? British Journal of Industrial Relations 29, no Hiltrop, Jean-Marie, Charles Despres, and Paul Sparrow. 1995. The changing role of HR managers in Europe Hunt, J., & Boxall, P. 1998. Are top human resource specialists ‘strategic partners’? Self perceptions of a corporate elite Kelly, J. 2001. The role of the personnel/HR function in multinational companies. Employee Relations 23, no Lachman, R., Nedd, A., & Hinings, R. 1994. Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: a theoretical framework Legge, K. 1978. Power, innovation and problem-solving in personnel management. London: McGraw-Hill. Lengnick-Hall M L and Lengnick-Hall, C A. 2003. Human Resource Management in the knowledge economy Monks, K. 1992. Models of personnel management: a means of understanding the diversity of personnel practices? Human Resource Management Journal 3, no Novecevic, Milorad M, and Michael Harvey. 2001. The changing role of the corporate HR function in global organizations of the twenty-first century Paauwe, J. 2004. Changing HRM roles: towards a real balanced HRM scorecard, chapter 9 in: Perlmutter, H. V., & Heenan, D. A. 1974. How multinational should your top managers be? Harvard Business Review, 52(6): 121-132. Purcell, J, and Bruce Ahlstrand. 1994. Human resource management in the multi-divisional company Scullion, Hugh, and Kenneth Starkey. 2000. In search of the changing role of the corporate human resource function in the international firm Sparrow, P, Harris, H and Brewster, C. 2003. Towards a new model of globalizing HRM. 7th Conference on International Human Resource Management Storey, J. 1992. Developments in Human Resource Management. Oxford: Blackwell. Stroh, L. K., & Caligiuri, P. M. 1988. Increasing global competitiveness through effective people management Taylor, S, S Beechler, and N Napier. 1996. Toward an integrative model of strategic international human resource management Tyson, S, and Fell, A. 1986. Evaluating the personnel function. London: Hutchinson. Ulrich, D. 1997. Human Resource Champions. Boston, USA: Harvard Business School Press.