Preview

Fugitive Slave Acts

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
929 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fugitive Slave Acts
Jamar Day
July 1, 2010
His 2111 Paper
Prof McCray By the middle of the nineteenth century, the issue of slavery had caused a deep division between North and South. Slavery was an important part of the Southern way of life, and slave labor was a major aspect of the Southern states' economy. Northerners opposed slavery yet were concerned that the political, economic, and conflict with the South over slavery could threaten a civil war between the two sides. The conflict intensified over the issue of fugitive, or escaped, slaves. Because slaves were treated as property in the South, slave owners felt it was their right to seek out and recapture slaves who had escaped to free Northern states. Northerners tended to view this practice as kidnapping. Many wondered if officials in the free states had a right not to interfere with the slave owner or in fact had the power to declare the slave a free person. Article 4, section 2 of the Constitution stated that slaves who escaped to free states had to be surrendered to their owners upon demand. Although the Constitution recognized the institution of slavery and the rights of slave owners, it was still unclear just what the law required of the people and officials in free states in regard to the matter of fugitive slaves. In other words, enforcement of the Constitution on this matter was a gray area decades before the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was an effort to provide a means to enforce the constitutional clause concerning escaped slaves. The act allowed a slave owner to seize an escaped slave, present the slave before a federal or local judge, and, upon proof of ownership, receive a certificate authorizing the slave to be retaken. It also established a penalty of 500 dollars for obstructing an owner's efforts to retake a slave, or for rescuing, harboring, or concealing a fugitive slave. Most Northerners saw the act as providing an excuse for the kidnapping of free blacks. Others resented the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was passed as a part of the Compromise of 1850. This act forced any federal official who did not arrest a runaway slave liable to pay a fine. This enraged abolitionist and caused their efforts against slavery to increase since it was one of the most controversial parts of the Compromise of 1850. This act increased the activity as fleeing slaves made their way to Canada.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To retain such fugitive in his custody, and to remove him to the State whence he fled, and there to deliver him to said claimant.” Much of the slave population was feed up with being retained from the outside world. African Americans were discriminated because of the color of their skin, and then forced to do free labor under cruel conditions. So slave men then started to rebel against the laws of 1793, and started to make escape plans. They were running away from slavery, and running towards their own freedom. Some of the plans of escape were successful but some had failed. The North and South both had totally different perspectives on slavery. Due to a great division between the North and South, Congress passed The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, that was part of The Compromise of 1850, which forced citizens to assist in capturing fugitives and denied those the right to a fair jury trial.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Sectionalism

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1850 the law was passed with a strict interpretation, if a runaway slave escapes to a Northern state, they can be captured, and be returned to their Southern owners. Southerners were beyond happy with his new law, mostly because these cases were put under the jurisdiction of the federal government, so Northerners had to oblige to the law. Also, if a free African American is captured they were denied the right of trial by jury, so any African American could be put into slavery. Northerners felt they were useless, due to they could not do anything about Southerners traveling to free states to capture African Americans, so slavery contributed to further dividing the Nation into two. In hopes of Southerners seeing the wrongs of slavery, Harriet Beecher Stowe, a Northerner, wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin. A fictional story that follows the life of a slave named Tom, showing the horrors of some slave owners and what slaves dealt with in their lifetime. Northerners were impressed and pleased with Stowe’s story, but Southerners were horrified by the writing thought it was vicious propaganda. North and South not seeing eye to eye on the issue of slavery, only brought more sectionalism to the Nation. Slavery issues continue into 1854 with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen A. Douglas introduced a bill in hopes of expanding slavery, that would split the Nebraska territory into two, the Nebraska Territory and Kansas territory, and allow the settlers to decide whether slavery is permitted or not, also known as popular sovereignty. Northerners saw this as giving into slavery, ironically President Pierce signs the bill into a law. An event occurred because of the signing, Bleeding Kansas, “Border Ruffians” arrived from Missouri in hopes of winning Kansas for the South and antislavery farmers from the Midwest migrated hoping for a free state. Soon enough fighting broke out between the two groups,…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Constitution, there are three parts that protect slavery. (1) Section 2: the 3/5 clause where a slave counts for 3/5 of a person. (2) International Slave trade: Africans are kidnapped and sold; Congress cannot ban this trade until 1808. (3) Demand Fugitive Slave clause (South): slaves who escape to the North are deemed by the Constitution to be returned to the South.…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was always a constant controversy with the issue of fugitive slaves throughout the time of the Civil War. Major Butler asked the question, “are they free?” and if so, “what do I do with them?” (Doc A). Many people ended up purchased slaves to work in the war as servants, cooks and soldiers. However, even though the Union only started allowing African Americans to fight in the war one month before it had ended, once they did so, the course of the war began to shift. At this point the North began to realize the dedication and heart the African Americans put into fighting for their freedom. After seeing this, the Union decided to make the abolition of slavery a primary goal of the Civil War (Doc B). By allowance of African Americans to fight in the war, the Civil War was changed from a battle of political disagreements and state power into a war of freedom and abolition of slavery (Doc D). This shift in the war was very apparent once the announcement of the Emancipation Proclamation was made. Although the Proclamation only freed slaves in areas of rebellion, I made a shift in purpose clear to both the North and the South. At first Lincoln was more of a neutral party to the whole slavery issue, but once he saw the eagerness of the blacks, it persuaded him to make the promise of freedom (Doc C). In the end, the willingness of the blacks to fight in the…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 13 Apush Assignment

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Fugitive Salve Act- provided harsh punishments for people who helped slaves run away. It also forced people living in free states to return run-away slaves to their owners.…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War-Causes.

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate over slavery and the provisions relating to it in the Constitution was a heated one at the Constitutional Convention. The issues of the slave's rights as either men or the property of their owners, the future of slavery in new territories, and the abolition of slavery and emancipation of slaves were never solved but rather a compromise made. The compromise was in return for the South's support for the ratification of the Constitution these provisions would be included in the Constitution: the Three-fifths Clause, the Fugitive Slave Law, and setting the date of 1808 for when the slave trade could be first ended. Anti-Slavery supporters reluctantly accepted the compromise in hope that the Constitution would be successful in its…

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His 115 = Civil War

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * The Fugitive Slave Act was passed as part of the Compromise of 1850. This act declared it was a federal crime punishable by fines to aid escaping or suspected slaves…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Amistad Case Study

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this legal study, the case of United States v. Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad, 40 U.S. 518 will be examined in relation to a supreme court precedent in the freeing of slaves in the American North . The date of the Supreme Court trial was 1841. The initial location of the Amistad trial began in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in Hartford, Connecticut, but was eventually tried in Washington D.C. in the U.S. Supreme Court. The liberation of illegally kidnapped slaves was a major shift in the Northern cause for the abolition of slavery in the 1840s. Slavery, after all, was still legal in the U.S., but the Supreme Court Chief justice Joseph Story defined illegality of the kidnapping of the slaves…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1850's Dbq

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “In a government where sectional interests and feelings may come into conflict, the sole security for permanence and peace is to be found in a Constitution whose provisions are inviolable” (Document B). But, what if the answer is not found in the Constitution? At this time there was an increasing sectional conflict between the North and the South. The problems arose mainly from the issue of slavery, and came largely after the Mexican war. Although the issue of slavery had never been fully resolved, it became a very heated subject during the 1850’s. The Constitution never took a clear stand on the issue, and the people began to see it more as source of sectional discord and tension and they ultimately began to see it as a failure to the union it had created.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain northerners were so against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C), [shows how kidnappers were being sent after the slaves, and how Northern abolitionists were revolting against the South's rules and regulations.] This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the Un-United States.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ reconstruction

    • 2318 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Perhaps the most challenging task facing our exhausted nation was the future status of the four million newly freed slaves. After the death of President Lincoln and the failure of President Johnson, Congress, in 1867, took charge of the effort to “reconstruct” our divided nation. A large part of “Congressional Reconstruction” was an effort to establish and protect the citizenship rights of the freedmen. The former Confederacy was divided into five military districts, each governed by a Union general. The Southern states, in order to rid themselves of these “military dictatorships,” were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing equal rights for all citizens—including former slaves. At the same time, large numbers of former Confederate soldiers and supporters were disfranchised—denied the right to vote. By 1870 all of the former Confederate states had ratified the Fourteenth Amendment and were readmitted to the union. In each state, the voting rights of freedmen were protected while voting was denied to many white Southerners. And so, with many whites not voting, and union troops remaining in the South to protect them, freedmen seemed to be enjoying some level of equal rights and full citizenship.…

    • 2318 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Fugitive Slave Law or Fugitive Slave Act was part of a group of laws that are known as the Compromise of 1850. The law required that all escaped slaves who fled were to be returned to their masters and prohibited anyone from aiding runaway slaves. Abolitionists hated the passage of this law so much that it played a major role in the end of slavery. The northern attitude toward slavery was resented by the southern states and was a contributing factor to the start of the Underground Railroad.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fugitive Slave Act was part of the Compromise of 1850. This act required that authorities in the North had to assist southern slave catchers to retrieve and return slaves to their owners. Southerners favored this act because they saw no slavery in the territories to the west, by the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act it would help preserve slavery in the south. This act allowed southern slave owners to get their slaves back when they escaped to the North that is why this act was important and critical to southern survival. The view of this act by the North was the opposite, especially from those who were black, they feared this act. The blacks in the North were terrified that this act would make it so they could be ushered back to the south even if they were innocent. This led to the creation of resistance groups in the North.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 1850, Congress did not tolerate this. They thought that this was getting way too far because of the fact that millions of slaves have escaped. Because of Harriet’s refusal to obeying the laws, Congress thought that this was totally unconstitutional (Kennedy 395). In September 1850 the Fugitive Slave Act was passed. This meant that ex-slaves or free slaves would have to return to the south to do hard labor. Slave catchers traveled through the North with guns and horses looking for a runaway slave that made it twice harder for them to escape. Non-slaves were also accused of being slaves. When caught by slave catchers, the slaves were often punished harshly and/or beaten to death.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays