from common to uncommon knowledge
Academy of Management Journal
2012, Vol. 55, No. 2, 421–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0352 FROM COMMON TO UNCOMMON KNOWLEDGE:
FOUNDATIONS OF FIRM-SPECIFIC USE OF KNOWLEDGE AS
A RESOURCE
RAJIV NAG
Georgia State University
DENNIS A. GIOIA
The Pennsylvania State University
Although the knowledge-based view of strategy has significantly advanced understanding of the foundations of competitive advantage, less is known about how knowledge becomes a strategic resource. In this study, we develop an inductive, process model of the relationships among (1) top managers’ beliefs about knowledge as a resource (termed executive knowledge schemes), (2) the ways that executives search or scan for knowledge, and (3) how they use that knowledge in practice to transform common knowledge into distinctive, uncommon knowledge as a way of achieving competitive advantage. In the course of generating the grounded model, we also uncovered a new concept, scanning proactiveness, and identified two distinct forms of knowledge use in practice: knowledge adaptation and knowledge augmentation.
One of the most venerable observations about knowledge is Francis Bacon’s dictum that “knowledge is power.” Management scholars have now firmly established the role of knowledge as one of the key competitive resources of modern times
(Drucker, 1993; Penrose, 1959) and have underscored the importance of knowledge in strategic and competitive contexts by proposing a knowledge-based view of the firm (Grant, 1996; Kogut &
Zander, 1992). Proponents of this view not only treat knowledge as the principal strategic resource, but also argue that firms supersede markets in their ability to create and harness this resource (Kogut &
Zander, 1992). A central premise of the knowledgebased view is that knowledge that is largely tacit and grounded in the unique historical and social context of a firm can be a source of sustained competitive advantage, because such knowledge is difficult for competitors to
2012, Vol. 55, No. 2, 421–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0352 FROM COMMON TO UNCOMMON KNOWLEDGE:
FOUNDATIONS OF FIRM-SPECIFIC USE OF KNOWLEDGE AS
A RESOURCE
RAJIV NAG
Georgia State University
DENNIS A. GIOIA
The Pennsylvania State University
Although the knowledge-based view of strategy has significantly advanced understanding of the foundations of competitive advantage, less is known about how knowledge becomes a strategic resource. In this study, we develop an inductive, process model of the relationships among (1) top managers’ beliefs about knowledge as a resource (termed executive knowledge schemes), (2) the ways that executives search or scan for knowledge, and (3) how they use that knowledge in practice to transform common knowledge into distinctive, uncommon knowledge as a way of achieving competitive advantage. In the course of generating the grounded model, we also uncovered a new concept, scanning proactiveness, and identified two distinct forms of knowledge use in practice: knowledge adaptation and knowledge augmentation.
One of the most venerable observations about knowledge is Francis Bacon’s dictum that “knowledge is power.” Management scholars have now firmly established the role of knowledge as one of the key competitive resources of modern times
(Drucker, 1993; Penrose, 1959) and have underscored the importance of knowledge in strategic and competitive contexts by proposing a knowledge-based view of the firm (Grant, 1996; Kogut &
Zander, 1992). Proponents of this view not only treat knowledge as the principal strategic resource, but also argue that firms supersede markets in their ability to create and harness this resource (Kogut &
Zander, 1992). A central premise of the knowledgebased view is that knowledge that is largely tacit and grounded in the unique historical and social context of a firm can be a source of sustained competitive advantage, because such knowledge is difficult for competitors to
References: Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. 2003. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities Aguilar, F. J. 1967. Scanning the business environment. Alvesson, M. 2004. Knowledge work and knowledgeintensive firms. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Amabile, T. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview. Anand, N., Gardner, H. K., & Morris, T. 2007. Knowledgebased innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Argote, L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. 1978. Organizational learning. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. 2009. Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance Axelrod, R. M. 1976. Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99 – 120. Barr, P. S. 1998. Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. 1992. Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Boyd, B. K., & Fulk, J. 1996. Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: A multidimensional model. Boynton, A. C., Gales, L. M., & Blackburn, R. S. 1993. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12: 198 –213. Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. 1999. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. 2011. Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36: Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition Culnan, M. J. 1983. Environmental scanning: The effects of task complexity and source accessibility on information gathering behavior Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems Daft, R. L. 1985. Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In L Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. 1988. Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study Danneels, E. 2008. Organizational antecedents of secondorder competencies. Strategic Management Journal, 49: 519 –543. Darr, E. D., Argote, L., & Epple, D. 1995. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service Dewey, J. 1922. Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York: Holt. Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. 1994. CEOs’ cognitive maps and the scope of the organization Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage Cangelosi, V. E., & Dill, W. R. 1965. Organizational learning: Observations toward a theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10: 128 –152. Dollinger, M. J. 1984. Environmental boundary spanning and information processing effects on organizational Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource-based Donaldson, G., & Lorsch, J