Preview

Freedom Of Speech: Schenck V. United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Freedom Of Speech: Schenck V. United States
While some believe freedom of speech violates the rights of others, it’s the main fundamental amendment people use nowadays. Included in the the First Amendment is freedom of speech which protect the citizens free expression. Freedom of speech let’s a citizen speak or express their own mind and opinion.
The First Amendment in the United States Constitution gives us the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech gives us the right to say our own opinion on anything we want to speak on. As citizens of this country, we are able to say our opinion on the government, taxes, school, or anything that comes to mind. We have our own opinions, having the ability to think for ourselves. There are many things that us as humans wouldn’t be able to say if it
…show more content…
This cases gave the supreme court different views on different kind of ideas dealing with our first amendment most closely looking at freedom of speech.” as said in the nytimes article. Different cases during the years had a different impact on the way freedom of speech is seen as now. One case that caught my attention was Schenck v. United States. This was the first case which explored the limits of the 1st Amendment free speech provisions by the Supreme Court. When America entered World War 1 in 1917, Congress passed a law called the Espionage Act which set stiff penalties for uttering and circulating “false” statements that interfere with the war. Charles Schenck was the general secretary of the Socialist party, in which his party believed that the war had been caused by and would only benefit the rich, while causing deaths and suffering for the thousands of poor people. Schenck participated in many activities that violated the espionage act, he was then arrested for it. The court came into conclusion that reasonable limits can be imposed on the 1st amendment’s guarantee on freedom of speech. They clarified on the meaning of free speech that have been modified and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court keyed the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech, under the first amendment. In finalizing the conviction of a man accused with disturbing the peace by handing out provocative flyers to draftees of the war, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that in certain ways, words can create a “clear and present danger” in a way that Congress may constitutionally disallow. While the decision has since been overturned, Schenck is still a major point in creating context-based balancing tests used in reviewing Freedom of Speech challenges.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hudgens V Labar Case Study

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Our constitution gives us the right under the First Amendment to the Freedom of Speech. This seems like a fairly straight forward right, but what many don’t know is that the Constitution only guarantees our right to freedom of speech against abridgement by government, federal or state. (Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 Lexis).…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The realty firm is correct. The court’s ruling in Schenck v. United States (1919) is in favor of the realty firm because placing "For Sale" or "Sold" signs in front of homes in racially changing neighborhoods does not creates "a clear-and-present-danger test of illegal acts". To go from the signs to a danger for the community takes a lot of deductions, which renders the initial act irrelevant to the eventual danger. The sign is a form of speech which is protected by the First Amendment. The ordinance also interfere with the firm's business, a fact that might lead to a lower revenue and lower employee's salary. Moreover, the citizens should have a right to be informed of their neighborhoods and to decide their changing of…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Schenck court case of 1919 developed out of opposition to U.S. involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Antiwar sentiment in the United States was particularly strong among socialists, German Americans, and religious groups that traditionally supported antiviolence. In response to this outlook, Congress passed the Espionage Act of 1917. This law provided heavy fines and jail terms for interfering with U.S. military operations or for causing or attempting to cause insubordination or disloyalty in the military. In addition, the act made it illegal to obstruct recruitment efforts of the U.S. armed forces.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment, Freedom of Speech could probably be considered one of the most powerful amendments of the Constitution. It is very important to distinguish the suitability of Freedom of Speech and its’ position under the First Amendment. The essay “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” presented by Derek Bok gives an example as to why this should be. In his essay Derek Bok responded to the presentation of the Confederate flag and the swastika by students at Harvard, with the expectation that the readers already have an understanding of what the phrase “freedom of speech” means to them as well as other people universally. “The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Haac Pros And Cons

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Free speech, more than any other of America’s values, has been the touchstone of American democracy dating back to the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment, created in 1791, is so important because “without our basic and essential rights established by that first amendment, the others amendments would have little to no meaning and hardly any force.” It shows the creativity and innovativeness of American democracy. The Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” However, almost from the moment the…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first amendment of the US Constitution has come into a lot of political controversy because it gives us some of the very essential rights to be whom we want to be. Under the first amendment we as United States citizens have the right to “freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble”, which some people don’t want us to have these rights and will try to come up with laws to restrain us from using them so it can benefit their cause (Ivers, 2013). I feel that the government wants to have the power to keep us in control and be able to do what they want, when they want with us.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects five fundamental freedoms: religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. These freedoms collectively form the bedrock of individual liberty, creating an environment where citizens can express themselves, participate in civic life, and hold their government accountable. Freedom of religion ensures that individuals have the right to practice their faith or choose not to, without interference from the government. Freedom of speech guarantees the right to express opinions and ideas, even those that may be unpopular or controversial; this freedom extends beyond mere verbal expression to encompass artistic, symbolic, and symbolic…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intent of the Framers

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Freedom of speech is part of the first amendment which states, “You are free to say almost anything except that which is obscene, slanders another person, or has a high probability of inciting others to take imminent lawless action.” (Patterson, 2008, p. 98) With the freedom of speech it is necessary to put certain restraints into place. The government cannot restrict what people say unless there is a clear and present danger to other people from the voicing of the statement. The freedom of speech was originally intended to give people the right to voice their opinion without being taken to court for it as long as it did not hurt anyone. Currently freedom of speech is viewed as a way to allow people the chance to speak for themselves. By allowing this government is allowing people to have a say in their governance and not ruled by the government without their input. This allows us to have a say in our government and what is represented by us. In 1927, Fiske vs. Kansas was a case that helped to invalidate state laws that restricted expression. The events that changed freedom of speech over the years are the burning of the flag court case, the “pentagon paper” publishing, and other such events throughout the years.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment guarantees every American’s right to the free exchange of ideas, beliefs, and political debate. The First Amendment of the Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (National Archives and Records Administration 2001). We have the right of freedom of speech and by definition, this means that we have “the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint” (Dictionary). This law is stated in the Bill of Rights and has been around since 1971. It is one of the oldest and most important amendments we adopted because as American people we have a…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1789, James Madison first proposed a set of documents that gave certain inalienable rights to Americans. On December 15, 1791 the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution were ratified and became known as the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment of the Constitution is the most sacred to Americans. It says that, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”. If we didn’t have these freedoms then America would not be what it is today. It is important that these freedoms are preserved and protected so that future generations can thrive and lead this country. In the following law review article, the issue of freedom of speech in the classroom is examined. This is an important topic because if the freedom of speech or expression is taken away from students, aren’t we taking away the chance for students to learn?…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment of the Bill of Rights gives people the freedom of speech or of the press. This part of the first amendment is extremely important for the people. The freedom of speech, or of the press, gives you the right of sharing your opinion or saying what is on your mind, and also saying what you think about a specific person without getting arrested. This right comes in handy when you are debating over something, thinking that your opinio is in a way more important than their opinion. For example, in political situations, the candidates debate saying vote for me cause I can do this, and the other candidate has a different opinion/idea than theirs, and you personally like one of the other candidates idea and strongly disagree with the other candidates idea.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The recent decision resulting from Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition, 2002 reenergizes many issues related to the First Amendment and free speech. The focus of the aforementioned case is the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA). There is a contention as to the courts and legislature's handling of virtual child pornography and whether it garners the same treatment– banned – as traditional child pornography. All sides of the issue consequently address the scope of the First Amendment, and Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion of the Court where he correctly limited the scope of intervention. Before delving into the hostile arena of virtual child pornography, a broader understanding of the context surrounding the First Amendment and…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays