One reason why we analytically shed light on all meanings of freedom is so that we can become more aware of the complexities involved with the various associations of “freedom” in ordinary usage. However, when we look as it from a single definition, it is to focus the reader’s attention on that particular spot. The risk with this method is that it is limiting through the way it blocks out the complexities. I think that it is important to consider all options and meanings when it comes to a definition, especially when it comes to its advantages and drawbacks. This analysis becomes valuable in understanding the total picture, not leaving out any possibilities.
Wenar makes the valid point of identifying Cohen as making this particular error in his essay “Freedom and Money.” Cohen insists that the neutral conception of negative freedom is freedom itself. Cohen also dismisses, all at once, alternatives to his concept on freedom.
In the second half of the essay, Wenar goes on to determine whether or not the