Preview

FREEDOM AND EQUALITY: CLASSICAL LIBERALISM VS. FACISM AND NATIONAL SOCIALISM

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2543 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
FREEDOM AND EQUALITY: CLASSICAL LIBERALISM VS. FACISM AND NATIONAL SOCIALISM
The concept of both freedom and equality play equally large roles in the ideologies of Classical Liberalism along with Fascism and National Socialism. Although freedom and equality play such large roles in these ideologies, they also play very different roles in each ideology. Freedom is defined as the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint 1. Equality, on the other hand is simply defined as the state of being equal 2. Classical Liberalism is based off the ideologies of John Locke, Adam Smith, and Immanuel Kant. These three figures helped develop the ideology of Classical Liberalism and ensured that freedom and equality would play a major positive role in the ideology. On the contrary, Fascism and National Socialism is the complete opposite of Classical Liberalism. Developed predominantly by Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, the ideology of Fascism and National Socialism is completely against the concept of freedom and equality.

The ideology of Classical Liberalism is extremely opposed to political totalitarianism. Classical Liberalism is firmly against having rulers/leaders who determine the rights and freedoms of their populations. The main objective of the ideology is to avoid the excesses of state of nature. John Locke once stated that “the unconstrained power of one in command of 100,000 is worse than arbitrary power of 100,000 individual single men.” 3 Locke firmly believed in this because he thought that one man who is in power of many other men could cause much more damage than that of a large group of individuals with equal power. A huge concern for Locke was determining a set of principles and rules in which political institutions must follow in order to benefit the majority of individuals.4 One of Locke’s more interesting ideologies is that of the state of nature. Locke believes that people are born as equals with the capacity to reason and generate ideas.5 It essentially



Bibliography: 1) freedom: definition of freedom in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)."Oxford Dictionaries. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Oct. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The basic ideas that founded liberalism and socialism are somewhat contradictory. Liberalism is completely focused upon the good of the individual where socialism is focused on the good of society overall. Liberalism was supported by the middle class as they would receive the biggest benefits from political representation, civil liberties and a written constitution to protect their rights. Socialism provided the most for workers regardless of class. This was because socialism called for publicly owned property and an economy handled completely by the government. Nationalism arouse from an awareness of being part of a community that has common institutions, traditions, language and customs. They believed that each nationality should have its own government. It refers to a feeling of cultural identity where one is loyal to a country rather than a king. Factors that promote nationalism are language, traditions, religion and defined territorial boundaries. Nationalism and liberalism became strong allies during the first half of the 19th century. The Nineteenth Century was filled with political turmoil between the nobles, the middle class, and the working class. This would lead to better rights backed with trade unions to protect workers on the job, welfare to protect workers unable to work and even a more democratic form of politics that would allow more workers to vote.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Resistance to Liberalism

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Liberalism, in general, was an ideological movement that emerged out of the ideas of the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution in the early 19th century. It embraced the ideas of individualism which were established in the Renaissance and Reformation era. The Renaissance period sparked a belief in the importance of the individual in society. It helped promote the beliefs of classical liberalism which gradually formed into the liberal ideology of the 19th century. Individuals that were waiting to get their individual rights and freedoms were allowed to finally gain liberty and power through this period of time. Classical liberalism developed from the ideologies of individuals such as Locke, Mill and Smith who were concerned with protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens. The Industrial Revolution strengthened the ideas of classical liberalism and allowed people to gain economic freedom, self-interest and private property. Classical liberalism transformed British into a society based on agriculture and the landed classes, interventionist government, and humanitarianism into a society based on industry and the middle classes, laissez-faire government and pursuit of industrial efficiency (Fielding, 2009). People flourished with great amount of wealth and power but there were others whose lives had been changed for the worse. Resistance to liberalism is justified to a great extent because it did not affect the lives all people. Liberalism disregarded the rights and civil liberties of the working class, lead to a discrepancy in the economic structure of society, and set its political values merely on the basis of individualism.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical liberals espouse negative freedom, which is the absence of external restraints on individuals. They believe in freedom of the individual, allowing individuals to make their own decisions without the state intruding. Classical liberals want few laws stating what an individual can and can’t do. However, they do recognise the need for some authority, understanding that if there are no rules one individual’s act might well infringe on someone else’s rights. Classical liberals, therefore, advocate the need for the state to protect the individual’s right.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is the model of analysis in international relations stressing the capacity of states to coexist and interact peacefully and harmoniously. Socialism is the ideology that argues that citizens are best served by policies focusing on meeting the basic needs of the entire society rather than by policies focusing on serving the needs of individuals as individuals. The difference between the two is that liberalism is a belief that the government should only minorly interfere within the daily lives of its citizens and that socialism will assure an equal distribution of wealth and goods to the population.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The source argues that in the name of protecting civil liberties, the mass people have too much of a say over things, and that those strong leaders in power do not "get a chance to serve the common good." The ideology presented in the source is that a single, strong leader provides more stability than a democracy. The source presented advocates in favour of a collective, authoritarian form of government. The philosopher Thomas Hobbes would have supported the source by referring to society's need for a "leviathan" or centralization of power, since he believed that people were incapable of governing themselves. However, this source is not a complete rejection of the values and principles of liberalism as it still maintains democracy as the system of government used, and democracy is…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberalism as an ideology revolves around the idea of freedom for the individual. The reason for this is due to the liberal’s view of human nature; they see the human being as unique and rational; able to make decisions in their best interest. Although all liberals agree on individual freedom, when it comes to the role of the state they are split down the middle. On one side there are the classic liberals who believe in as little state intervention as possible, and on the other side there is the modern liberals who believe state intervention is necessary as it can develop people and create equal opportunity. When looking at a liberal view of the state it is necessary to focus on both modern and classic liberals and compare their ideas. Classic liberalism can clearly be defined by the desire to minimise the role of the state, this is also known as negative freedom. Whereas modern liberalism believes the state is necessary to develop individuals and create opportunity, this is known as positive freedom.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a classical liberal government, the government plays a smaller and limited role in the lives of the people. Classical liberalism limits the state’s power thus allowing the people more freedom to do what they want. Things such as economics and social interactions are not regulated in a government that follows classical liberalism. In a government which follows modern liberalism, the government plays a much greater role. They become much more involved and are in charge of regulating things such as social and economic interactions. The government becomes an interventionist government. The goal of the interventionist government is to provide expansive liberty to its people. Modern liberalism is a revised version of classical liberalism. It was created because some saw classical liberalism as to unequal and flawed.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The philosophy of Classical liberalism typically advocates limited government, support of the constitution, due process, the rule of law and individual liberty. Some of the liberties they advocate and believe should be protected include freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion and free markets. Classical liberalism was primarily developed during the 1800s in the United States and Britain in response to the Industrial Revolution. Some of the major theorists of Classic liberalism include John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Adam Smith.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Week 1 Quiz

    • 651 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The answer can be found in the section “How Does Contemporary Liberalism Compare with Classical Liberalism?”…

    • 651 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical liberalism dates back to the seventeenth century and lasted until the nineteenth century. This was during the time that kings ruled because God selected the king’s family to shepherd His people. Classical liberalism opposed the “divine rights of Kings” (PP Classical Liberalism) and wanted to maximize the rights of the people and minimize the power if the state. It was during this time that liberalists like John Locke, Adam Smith, Jean-Jacques…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Classical Liberalism is against government interventionism in all realms of life. They believe that everyone should be treated equally regardless of income. This differs from reform liberalism, as they want government intervention to guarantee equality of opportunity. This is made possible by progressive income tax, government regulation on big business, and social welfare. In My opinion Classical Liberalism is superior as its fair and easier to implement than reform Liberalism.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical liberalism is much like individualism. Classical liberalist believes that the government should have a limit and that individual liberty it what matters most. Individual liberty including freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and free markets are all good examples of what classical liberalism would consist of. Classical liberals do not like for the government to interfere with their personal lives. They stress instead reliance on private initiatives or the free market to determine the best outcomes. (p. 3) Classical liberals are individuals who like to put themselves before anything or anyone. Therefore, when I think classical liberalism, I think about a saying my sister always say “let me do me while you do you”. Classical liberals do not trust the government 100%, but they respect the government.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays