Preview

Free Trade and Protectionism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1145 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Free Trade and Protectionism
FREE TRADE VS PROTECTIONISM
The issue of Free Trade and Protectionism is one of the most important debates in International economy. According to free trade, they believe in opening the global market, with as few restrictions on trade as possible. On the other hand proponents of protectionism believe in concentrating on the welfare of the domestic economy by limiting the open-market policy. Both sides have strong view points, but it is important to analyze the benefits and disadvantages of free trade and protectionism to determine what is convenient for each country depending on its economic development.
Protectionism is the government practice of restricting imports and exports between one country and another. Tariffs are sometimes placed on imports or exports, raising the price for doing such things. In contrast, free trade removes such restrictions. The aims of protectionism are to preserve jobs. By increasing the cost of importing, businesses are encouraged to produce products within the country where the products will be sold. Free trade advocates argue that protectionism leads to higher prices because workers at home are not necessarily willing to work for lower wages.
Free trade could lead some problems in the economy of a country. The first problem is the assumption trade is sustainable. A nation exporting non-renewable resources may discover that its best move (in the short run) is to export until it runs out. The flip side is overconsumption, in which a nation (like the U.S.) borrows from abroad and sells off assets in order to finance a short-term binge of imports that lowers its long-term living standard. Free trade economics defines both these problems out of existence by conceiving economic efficiency as merely the optimal satisfaction of consumer preferences, so if consumers want a short-term binge, then free trade is "efficient."
Another problem is the assumption that free trade does not increase income inequality. If it does, free trade may

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Fins2622 Notes

    • 6821 Words
    • 6 Pages

     Free Trade: David Ricardo (support free trade) o Theory of comparative advantage: For two nations without input factor mobility, specialisation and trade could result in increased total output and lower costs than if each nation tried to produce in isolation.  Both nations can benefit from trade if each specialises in good that they have the lowest opportunity cost, even if one economy is more efficient in making everything.  However, Comparative advantage in not static, and changes over time in reality.  Also, comparative advantage assumes that factors of production can’t move between countries  therefore comparative advantage is set to be outdated  production and employment usually moves to the lowest cost economies  Reality: Countries encourage exports, but limit imports o Due to mecantalism  i.e. total world wealth is limited and trade is a 0‐sum game if one country benefits, the other loses in order to win, you encourage exports  HOW? Through colanising  therefore legislated that the country could only trade with colonised country.  Who gains from free trade?  Some say that comparative advantage is just a way for developed economies to gain  Because before, developed economies were very protected (in order to establish their industries), and now they want everyone to do free trade (to benefit themselves). Since developed economies developed their industries a long time ago, they usually have a comparative advantage in high technology products (which lead to greater growth compared to agricultural products), whilst the developing countries specialise in the lower growth agricultural products.  Creation of international institutions: GATT, WTO  Creation of trade blocs…

    • 6821 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harvey N M2 A2

    • 621 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Hann describes free trade as, “generally considered by economists to be beneficial to international trade by encouraging competition, innovation, efficient production and consumer choice” (Hann, 2011 para. 1). Free trade allows freedom of international exchanges; with this there are advantages as well as disadvantages. Some advantages consist of cost advantages, factor earnings, cheaper imports, and an enlarged market (Chand, 2015). Cost advantage allows free trade to warrant a portion of possessions and resources. This in turn leads free trade into the most efficient conduct of economic affairs. Factor earnings and cheaper imports allow production factors to increase while import rates decrease. Enlarging the market is an advantage of free trade because it increases the market allowing labor to be possible. The disadvantages of free trade consist of all countries being in conjunction and working together. Meaning it will only work and be productive if all countries participate, if there is one country that decides not to partake in free trade, it will not work. It is also unfair to and creates a disadvantage to countries for those countries that are unable to compete with larger, advanced countries (Chand, 2015).…

    • 621 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the most significant arguments in favor of free trade is its ability to improve economic efficiency. If free trade opens up a market to imports, the consumer benefits from the low priced imports. If free trade opens up a market for imports, then producers benefit from the new place to sell. Supporters of free trade state that free trade in an economy improves welfare for society…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free trade, interchange of commodities across political frontiers without restrictions such as tariffs, quotas, or foreign exchange controls. This economic policy contrasts with protectionist policies that use such restrictions to protect or stimulate domestic industries. In this article I will discuss the positive and negative effects of free trade. Trade can lead to an improvement in overall economic welfare if countries specialize in the products in which they have a production advantage. Trade allows businesses to exploit economies of scale by operating in international markets. International competition stimulates higher efficiency and reduces monopoly power. Trade enhances consumer choice and international competition between suppliers helps to keep prices down. Trade in ideas stimulates product and process innovations that generates better products for consumers and…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study

    • 2618 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Free trade is a policy by which a government does not discriminate against imports or interfere with exports by applying tariffs (to imports) or subsidies (to exports) or quotas. According to the law of comparative advantage, the policy permits trading partners’ mutual gains from trade of goods and services.…

    • 2618 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    t is understandable that a country would want to take care of its own citizens first. To this end, many countries adopt policies that prop up domestic industries and limit foreign organizations from engaging in business in their country. Generally speaking, such policies are typically labeled “protectionism.” A formal definition of protectionism is the “National economic policies designed to restrict free trade and protect domestic industries from foreign competition” (S. Tamer Cavusgil, Gary Knight, and John R. Riesenberger, International Business. 2008. Pearson, p. 620). Protectionist policies include governmental actions such as tariffs (taxes on imported goods), quotas (limits on the amount of goods that can be imported), subsidies (government support of certain domestic businesses or…

    • 10943 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author explains that some of American could get the benefit of free trade. For instance, the investors can build their factories abroad the country that helps them to get cheap labor. Moreover, free trade is good, provided we have protections in place to make people feel sufficiently secure in a time of rapid economic change. This means health care and pension security that aren’t tied to a job that can suddenly disappear. It means broader trade adjustment assistance, job retraining, and wage insurance that keeps offshoring from being a disaster for affected families. On the other hand, Miller writes a disadvantage of free trade because some of the workers are lose their job and they lose their protections. For instance, the human job replaced by the reboot. So the United States policy maker should consider the dilemma and the benefit of free…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits of Tariff

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Therefore, it is my opinion that protectionist trade compared to free trade is the way to go for a few reasons:…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Protectionism is a view that free trade is injurious and should be restricted. Protectionist policies are used in order to protect domestic industries. Protectionism is often criticized by the supporters of free trade as harming economies instead of assisting them (Frank and Bernanke). Tariff is an example of a protectionist measure which the supporters of Laissez-faire view as an obstacle to free trade among nations limiting their opportunities to benefit from exchanging goods and services with one another.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    The effects of globalization have touched all the aspects of life and business today. One aspect is the trading policies between countries. Since the late nineteenth century, the collision started between domestic and foreign industries, which ask governments for measures that could protect local industries, without discouraging the country’s trade relations. The term ‘Protectionism’ was thus introduced in the language of global trade and economy (Rowley, 2002). Protectionism is an economic policy applied in the trading system, to restrict the quantity of imported items, and to flourish country’s exports. The objective of this is policy is to maintain the competition between foreign and the domestic industries. In most of the countries, free trade is not followed and various tariffs and duty charges are applied on the import goods. These taxes allow the government to generate a fair bit of revenue, without utilizing their resources. Moreover, it also helps in the sustainability of the domestic industries. The prices of the imported goods are kept higher by adding these taxes so that the local customers, looking for cheaper options, have to buy the domestic items. In parallel to this, the protectionism policy allows domestic industries to raise the prices of their products, without raising the quality of their products (Ethier & Fischer, 1987, pp.1-2).…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free trade has become one of the most controversial subjects of modern times. Though despite its challenges, the positive role it has been playing in the lives of millions of people around the world is commendable. It gives us access to new foods, products and experiences, and creates economic opportunity and markets. Free trade also allows countries to specialize in the production of goods that they have a comparative advantage and trading them for goods in which they have a comparative disadvantage. When countries engage in such trade, they can have more of both goods, which is a good deal. It also make the world a better place because more places will be able…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout the world, countries engage in international trade every day. The result of international trade is that it produces mutual benefits among the countries that are involved. However, when a country engages in trade protection, it hurts both the domestic consumers and foreign export industries. Three arguments that are used to promote trade barriers are the national security argument, the infant industry argument, and the dumping argument. Although these three arguments have their pros, such as protecting domestic industries from foreign competitors, they also have their flaws.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Globalization together with free economic trade, are accepted today as something if not inevitable, then at least natural. Numerous researchers from organizations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Trade Organization (WTO) and others publish their research papers annually, aiming to justify and show the benefits of globalization, and free trade as part of it. On one side, world history of trade remembers when free economic interchange exacerbates for existing distortions and harmed social, economic, and environmental protection of the poorer partner of trades. Security of a country could suffer from free trade as well, free trade would lead to 'interdependence', which could, in turn, hamper a country's independent pursuit of its national interests; also, other countries could use trade as leverage over one's country. Can free economic trade help providing development capital? If the answer “no”, the free economic trade could not be beneficial in general. Diversification and specialization – are they advocating against or for free trading? The strongest advantages of globalization are conflict inhibition and promoting democracy. However, would they be enough to start voting for it? Protecting the domestic economy is closely aligned with anti-globalization. It is a time now to analyze both sets of arguments and determine the truth about whether free economic interchange beneficial and if yes then for whom it is beneficial.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the global economy, there are free trade zones and there are restricted zones. Free Trade exists when there is an absence of government imposed barriers in existence between nations in order to restrict trade. When barriers such as those referred to as protectionist policies exist, free trade becomes restricted. Protection is essentially defined as any action by national governments that will give an artificial competitive advantage to domestic producers at the expense of foreign producers. National governments aim to protect their nation from the disadvantages of free trade, through protectionist policies in the form of subsidies, tariffs, local content rules, quotas, export incentives and voluntary export restraints. Reasons for protection include “The Infant Industry argument” which states that some industries in a given country may develop a comparative advantage if only they are sheltered from foreign competition for a while, by means of temporary protection. So if in the future, the infant industries ‘grow up’ and form a comparative advantage, the domestic economy will gain access to a larger demand market, creating an injection into the economy, resulting in increased economic activity and employment. The domestic protection argument states that free trade and increased global competition can result in structural unemployment. Therefore, it has become apparent that infant industries need to be protected, dumping prevented, domestic employment sustained and the defense and self sufficiency of a nation ensured.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the answer is yes, the assertion is that the concept of free trade is a gimmick or an unfair scenario. If a nation has more flexibility through trade agreements, and that nation also offers more subsidies to its exporters; other nations that may not be able to offer their businesses equal aid, will not be able to participate in true “free trade”. Countries like China and the US wield great power when it comes to trade. Smaller, less developed nations simply do not have the resources or revenue to offer their MNC’s loans, subsidies and support on the same scale as “superpower” nations do.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays