Preview

Frankenstein: Nature vs Nurture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Frankenstein: Nature vs Nurture
Twins are commonly used to study the effects of nature versus nurture. Ones immediate surroundings define who they become later on in life. The environment plays a huge role in the development of humanity through cultivating personality, character, beliefs, and many different aspects in a person’s life. Different environmental influences provide for a variety of people. In terms of the literary selection Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the author’s view on Nature vs. Nurture is that the development of an individual revolves around nature.
Firstly, the creature conceals wantonly emotions due to the flagrant mistreatment of society. Frankenstein exclaims “The love of another will destroy the cause of my crimes, and I shall become a thing of whose existence everyone will be ignorant” (Shelley 106). If someone is being shown love and kindness, they will be prone to reciprocate these emotions. As Frankenstein is persuading Victor to create him a female he commiserates with humanity exclaiming, “I shall feel the affections of a sensitive being and become linked to the chain of existence and events, from which I am now excluded” (Shelley 106). Long term advantages for learning behavior and for the development of physical and mental health are obtained through stabilizing secure, receptive, and nourishing relationships. The creature learns this is early on in life which is beneficial, so he can carry out illustrious and consistent acts which is the key sustaining the foundation of a prevailing lifestyle. At first, the creature is destitute in expressing himself, however as he matures, he is able to manifest dissimilar emotions. Frankenstein verbally analyzes himself through concluding, “I am malicious because I am miserable. Am I not shunned and hated by all mankind” (Shelley 104). Learning through the acts of society and constantly being around certain attitudes attaches to the creature’s senses and he adapts. By virtue of observing and grasping certain ideals of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The desire for companionship grows so intensely within the non-human subspecies that the monster asks Victor Frankenstein for an outlandish favor: a female counterpart. Through a lover, the monster can display his inner love with a being that does not judge him. At the time when the monster acts for a love, he has yet to found any acceptance in the human society. Thus, a monster counterpart would provide the only outlet of affection for the monster. The monster’s wish for a partner exemplifies that the monster stereotype that literature and film have created are not as narrow as once thought. The desire for love can exist even in a non-human species, and love does not limit itself based on appearances or classifications. Victor Frankenstein, however, denies the monster a lover, believing that a race of monsters would spur from a second creation. The creature never indicates that he would terrorize the world if given a counterpart, and in fact would leave human society to spend him with his significant other (205). The monster’s hopes are benign, and Victor Frankenstein distorts and mystifies the monster’s intentions. Clearly, the monster in Frankenstein does not define itself through a series of checklists about “how to be a monster,” but rather breaks the boundaries of traditional monstrosities. This monster does not parade through the town trying to terrorize the people that it encounters; this…

    • 1844 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The monster continually calls out for sensibility from the romantic. The monster has a desire for companionship, and implores of his creator to make him a being of his own species. The monster also desires to be accepted by mankind. The final way the monster displays sensibility is through his desire to learn. He displays his capabilities of learning at the beginning of his creation, and continues to grow throughout the novel. Victor Frankenstein shows the individualistic, mystic, and love of nature side of romanticism. He displays individualism through his desire to be his own creator. He also rejects the help from others, and strives on selfish ambition. Victor shows the mysticism, through gaining power of being his own god. Finally, he shows a love for nature, through taking the time to breathe and admire the beautiful countryside around him. Romanticism is concluded in the comparison of the two characters, and how similar their situations are. Victor Frankenstein and the monster both have a strong desire for love from others around them. They also show great passion for sympathy from others, which they do not necessarily receive. Their situations are unrealistic, and portray the case of non-neoclassicism. Both Frankenstein and the monster experience deep sorrow throughout the entire novel. This experience is heightened when the monster is denied a companion and Victor loses all of his loved ones. In the end, both Victor and the creature share their desire for friendship, which neither fully obtain, due to the circumstances of the rejection and bitterness. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, displays the aspects of Romanticism through Frankenstein and his creature; they display sensibility, individualism, love of nature, non-neoclassicism, and…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. nurture develops a strong debate in psychology. It is made up of two independent dynamics with different approaches in behavioural changes. The two dynamics is made up of nature and nurture. There are no contentions that McLeod's tries to unravel technical differences between the two dynamics. In the novel frankenstein Nature expresses the external characteristics of human beings that are projected by genetic inheritance. It is difficult to alter changes in some external, internal characteristics that are developed by inheritance of particular genes. Nurture refers to external expressions developed by interaction of different environments and people. It is evident that nurture characteristic can be altered by the people. This is…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. Nurture: Is mankind inherently good or bad? In my personal opinion, I think that people are naturally born pure and innocent. In Frankenstein, the creature just wanted to be a part of the community, and when Victor created him, he was eager to learn and he had no fault.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Victor’s rejection and abandonment of the creature and many other people’s subsequent rejection of the creature, based on appearance, reminds the reader of how society (both in Shelley’s era and in the modern day), can and do reject those who are different and Shelley cultivates more sympathy from the reader this way. Frankenstein has had love and support from family all his life, by showing us Frankenstein’s childhood and then showing us his acts toward the creature readers are positioned to think of how callous, selfish and awful Frankenstein is as he rejects the creature and does not deem him worthy. Frankenstein tells the readers of his charmed childhood and because of this the reader thinks he’s a decent man, you also admire how he loves…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do people act the way they do? In the book Frankenstein, the creature is created by using many different dead body parts and then shocked to life. The creature is abandoned because of his intolerable appearance. Put into this world with absolutely no prior knowledge about anything, this deformed creature must learn the ways of life and somehow learn to get by. Denied by every human that he encounters, the creature turns to a life of destruction. Vowing to get revenge on his creator, he begins to murder anyone who is of relation or close to Victor. Why does the creature turn to violence? Is it because of his unusual upbringing? Or is it because of the neglect from every person he encounters?…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the creation of the Creature, a figure so rejected by society, he longs for companionship and acceptance. He was born a neutral being, into his abandoned state; “Believe me, Frankenstein: I was…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Victor Frankenstein’s creature, there was no opportunity to be instructed by a father figure, so the monster was faced with the more difficult task of forming morals completely on his own. The creature was forced to learn to live on its own because Victor abandoned it as soon as it opened its eyes. This causes…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychologists have long debated the nature versus nurture issue in the shaping of our identities. Are we shaped by our biology or by our environment? This psychological debate is explored in Mary Shelly’s gothic novel, Frankenstein. The novel poses a simple question: Was Frankenstein’s monster inherently an evil creature, or was he made into a killer because of his environment? Shelly’s characterization of Frankenstein’s monster shows that the creature began as a clean slate, but was shaped into a monster by his experiences and isolation.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is here where the creature tells of his true nature. He is a being only wanting sympathy and compassion not unlike the wanting of most men. When he first meets people in a village he is immediately hated. He does not yet understand why and wishes only for the friendship and understanding. His next attempt is with a family living in a small cottage near the woodlands of which the monster resides. Learning from his previous encounter with the village people he waits months to attempt speaking to the cottagers. When he does he is only accepted by the blind father, but this joy is short lived by the creature for the son of the man immediately upon his return to the cottage throws the being out in an attempt to “save” their father from the retched beast. It is here after that the beast learns that the only being he can gain sympathy from would be one of his own species, however, only his creator can make him a companion. Frankenstein firstly agrees to the task only to realize what this would mean to the world and destroys his work before it is finished. This is the final blow the monster and he becomes ever more so blood…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, misery and isolation compel the Creature to act rampantly against society’s moral standards. Despite being left in isolation, the Creature manages to hurt people while using misery as a justification for murder.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is nothing worse than feeling detested and abhorred by society, especially if this hatred is caused solely by one's physical appearance. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley uses the Creature to show how people are inherently good, but compelled to become evil only when ostracized by their fellow man. Although the Creature is initially full of love and is surrounded by examples of human happiness, he finds himself excluded from this happiness, through no fault of his own. The creature turns to evil only after he is spurned by humanity. Two tragic events lead to his transformation: being rejected by his 'family' - the De Laceys, and being rejected by his creator - Victor Frankenstein.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The creature’s claims of his benevolence prior to uniting with Victor Frankenstein was true, based on his admiration of the cottages that he observed and the acts of kindness that he performs for them. The creature expresses his adoration for the cottagers, because when he observes them he “felt sensations of peculiar and overpowering [force]... such as [he] had never experienced, either from hunger and cold, warmth and food”(105). From observing the cottagers he learns how to read, talk, as well as how human society works. The creature is so moved by observing their daily motions he hopes that one day they, “ [his] protectors”(121) will not judge him as cruelly as the other people have before them.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do people react to situations from things they learn? People have the ability to react to situations from a hereditary standpoint or the acquired standpoint. This statement is the idea of the nature versus nurture debate and how it affects our lives. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley shows examples of the nature versus nurture debate by showing how the creature wants acceptance and to show that he wasn’t born evil.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, Frankenstein’s creation is a child in a distorted and large frame. He tends to be scared and vulnerable when alone and seeks approval as children do, such as when they cry out for their parents. He also starts off his life unbiased and unprejudiced, happy with the world, even loving his surroundings. Just as young children hold no prejudices until altered by their surroundings as the creature was after he was attacked by villagers and rejected by the ones he loves. Finally both children and the monster had to develop their senses and learn about the world around them through experience. In reality…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays