Preview

Fossil Capitalism Dualism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fossil Capitalism Dualism
Capitalism and the United States monetary system refuse to productively reduce the the increasing rise of climate change for reasons that benefit only a small amount of profit holders. Malm’s Fossil Capital argues that the systematic methods of capitalism have historically and currently, constructed a benefit for capitalists in systematic dualism of power that taxes the environment and the people by utilizing stock power, a method of using natural resources for power, for an endless, increasing profit. This increasing profit rhetoric that is embedded into capitalism has been reflected into the United States monetary system through an endless desire for economic expansion and a drive for debt, as Bjerg explains in Parallax of Growth, and further …show more content…
This concept, coined by Malm, coincides with stock power because dualism of power cannot exist as it did historically, and does currently, without stock power because of the power over natural resources. The theory can be defined as capitalists having power and control over the laborers and the natural and non renewable resources within the capitalist system. In a sense, the capitalists control the process of manufacturing a product because of the dualism of power over both laborers and the ecosystem, forcing the the ecosystem and laborers to abide by the commands of the capitalist. Domination against labors occurs because of the ever increasing wealth that capitalists generate from the profit which creates an economical hierarchy. This economical hierarchy is ever so present in capitalism because as the capitalists consistently generate profit through the product they oversee; the laborers that actually construct the product stay in the same position of wealth without owning the product they manufacture. Furthermore, this same theory is applicable to the understanding of capitalism in control of environmental resources. Capitalism has, in a sense, control and power over the fossil fuels and environmental surroundings that are necessary, from the capitalist perspective, to creating the product and generate profit. As Malm exemplifies, Britain’s stock power of …show more content…
To explain this reasoning, it is understood that capitalists desire more economic growth that is fulfilled through the use of natural resources and laborers that are under power of capitalism. Desire, essentially, is the ignition to capitalism- the desire to fulfill the need and want of money and personal economic growth for one’s benefit. Dualism of power provides an outlet for this desire to thrive, as it controls natural resources to fuel means of production that require the overlook of laborers that finally fuel the profit outcome, the initial reasoning for capitalism. Dualism of power cannot be terminated as long as the desire for perpetual economic growth continues to thrive within capitalism. Since dualism of power is successful in terms of producing profit for capitalists, the desire will continue, thus producing a never ending cycle. Futhermore, Bjerg’s theory of drive can be connected to this cycling desire for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    sosc1140 essay 2

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capitalism is the most productive economic system that ever exists. Its emergence and development have brought an amazingly rapid increase in productivity. However, the fact that cyclical capitalist economic crisis arises proves that capitalism does not make sense because it has contradictions in it. In this article, I am going to provide explanations about what Engels means by historical materialism, the fundamental contradiction in capitalism and two other contradictions that arise from this contradiction. And I will conclude by explaining Engels’ s anticipation of the eventual outcome of the historical development of capitalism. My main argument is that the fundamental contradiction in capitalism is the contradiction between social production and individual appropriation which leads to the contradiction between the systematic organization of production inside factories and the disorganization of production in society as a whole and the contradiction between the mode of production and the mode of exchange, and the contradiction between market and production (Frederick 295; Frederick 299; Frederick 302).…

    • 1294 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By putting a price on the use of natural resources, it encourages more responsible and sustainable practices, potentially leading to a healthier environment. Barnes’ proposal is a bold reimagining of how society can support its citizens in an era where traditional jobs are no longer a guarantee of middle-class security. It is a call to action for policymakers and the public to consider new ways of ensuring economic stability and reducing the wealth gap, while also promoting environmental conservation. “How to Save the Middle Class When Jobs Don’t Pay Enough” is a thought-provoking examination of the challenges facing the middle class and a visionary proposal for creating a more equitable and sustainable economic system. He also emphasizes the importance of environmental stewardship and the need to balance economic growth and sustainability.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The environmentalist, Bill McKibben, author of “Deep Economy,” argues that we are currently living through an ecological crisis. He states that the three main reasons why our environment is in a climacteric situation is because political intervention isn’t helpful, we have exceeded our resources and the things we produce are no longer making us happy. He altercates that people invest on things and construct the greatest innovations despite the fact that it no longer satisfies their needs. McKibben asserts that we have surpassed the barrier that was available for our resources which induced us to jeopardizing our future generations. However, Mckibben does not emphasize who the people are and how they individually and collectively affect the…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hot, Flat, and Crowded by Thomas L. Friedman is a book that outlines the causes of climate change, argues against those who refuse to believe in climate change, proposes solutions to the challenges of climate change, and urges the United States to be at the forefront of these solutions. Friedman argues that the United States would be able to overcome the Great Recession if it shifted its focus on finding viable alternatives to fossil fuels and reforming our current energy systems. Freidman begins the book by looking at America’s political and economic downfall in recent times, attributing it to the country’s inability to take a good look at itself and reform before it implodes, mainly with mortgages and loans, which led to the giant national debt. The country adopted a faulty system in order to make a quick dollar and ended up owing trillions, but not before inspiring…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental ecological flaws of the capitalist system have been emphasized primarily by critical political-economic thinkers coming out of or deeply influenced by the Marxist tradition. In the United States environmental sociology has been deeply affected by two critical concepts arising out of Marx, the treadmill of production, and the metabolic rift. The treadmill of production concept is the notion that capitalism is geared above all to exponential growth, as suggested by Marx’s M-C-M’ shorthand. The level of economic activity in each period starts with the end point of the previous period, leading to a doubling of economic output. The driving force of this expansion is capital accumulation and the search for ever expanding profits. Marx’s theory of the metabolic rift helps us understand capitalism’s intensive, not merely extensive, destruction of the environment. The metabolic rift was developed as capitalism systematically violated the basic conditions of sustainability on an increasingly large scale, through soil intensification and global transportation of nutrients, food, and fiber (Clark, B., & York, R.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels stood firm in their belief that the main theme of industrial capitalism was freedom. They wanted the proletarians to have the freedom to become a complete human being by recreating oneself through free choices. They accredited a high importance to the human persona and thought that making a life was separate from producing an item for another person. Marx and Engels express their concerns for the human under capitalism through Communist Manifesto. Capitalism forces individual self-advance but only in preventive and misleading ways because almost everything the bourgeois society creates will only exist to be torn down. For Marx and Engels, capitalism is approaching a massive climax where those who are being crushed by it are overcoming the people who benefit from it. Marx recognizes, however, that the working class has no way of seizing property since none of them own anything themselves, consequently they will have to tear down and destroy all private ownership which will result in class itself disappearing. In such a notion that capitalism is seen as a "runaway train," Marx and Engels dispute the next stages in this historical dialectic is for the proletarians to own the ways of production, an arrangement where there will be a transposition of society so that those who are lacking power will now have it once they distinguish their…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: "What is Capitalism?". World Socialist Movement, 13 Aug. 2006. Web. 8 May 2012. .…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas More's Utopia

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Often devoid of reason, logic, and morality - power asserts its authority over the truth as a means of survival. This got me thinking about economics specifically. Most economists well-versed in the science of the climate change acknowledge that we need a global war on climate change commensurate with worldwide resource allocation during WWII. Yet global superpowers and developing nations alike frequently produce impotent agreements such as the Paris Climate Accords, that aren’t truly binding. Seemingly, moderation ensures security for power. Small reductions in carbon emissions won’t engender an economic collapse with political ramifications. However, a fundamental realignment in the our relationship to the environment could have disastrous ramifications. Imagine what a global carbon tax might due to business. Global markets could collapse, and short-term ramifications on ordinary individuals could prove disastrous. Ultimately, it will this be this economic calculous on the part of the entrenched powers that be. Are we fearful of the environmental calamity of inaction? Or are we more afraid of the short-term economic decline that would undoubtedly accompany an unprecedented shift in our relationship to the environment? Sadly, if the insights into French hierarchy by Thomas More prove accurate, power will likely aim to maintain itself through the path of least…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx presents the theory of world history as a succession of class-struggles for economic and political power. He believes in the universal idea that power is found primarily through this relation. He concerns himself with the modern capitalist society where there exists the conflict between the exploiting bourgeoisie and the exploited proletariat. He defines the proletariat as the class which consists of people who are shut off from direct access to the means of production and are forced to live through their power to produce wealth by laboring upon machines and materials which aren't their own. They live off of their "labor-power." The bourgeoisie on the other hand, lives off of "surplus value" which arises from the exploitation of labor. They are the owners of those resources of production which the proletariat work on for their survival. It is interesting to note how Marx places the individual into a broader scheme and through this process, creates a social theory. Marx asks us to see the relation…

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is an economic system in which individuals privately own productive resources and posses property rights to use these resources in whatever manner they choose, subject to certain (minimal) legal restrictions. An idealized capitalist system works within the institution of private property that is controlled an enforced through the legal framework of laws, courts and police. Further, such a system is one of free enterprise, where producers freely choose the resources they use in the products they produce. Consumers have freedom of choice also, as do workers and owners in general. Individuals and producers express their desires through the market system, where prices are signals about the relative scarcities of goods, services and resources. The role of government is a limited one.…

    • 2308 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx is seen as one of the defining figures in the fight against capitalism as he saw it as the main source of alienation and he was interested in “the oppressiveness of the capitalist system that was emerging out of the Industrial Revolution” (Ritzer 2011:25). Moving from feudal to capitalist society, Marx assesses how life has changed for the proletariat (working class labourers) and the bourgeoisie (owners of capital, means of production) in terms of the process of production and ownership of labour (Giddens & Held 1982:5). He also analyses the class struggle against the capitalist bourgeoisie and how the commodities of capitalism, such as use and exchange value, allow capitalism to grow, expand and control the people which provide the basis for its growth (Ritzer, 2011; Giddens, 1971). Ritzer (2011) and others, then attempt to compare Marx’s beliefs of capitalism to the modern system of capitalism found in today’s society. Through examples such as the U.S. Federal Review Board raising interest rates and blaming the “economy” in order to save the capitalists (Ritzer, 2011) and Morgenstern’s piece in The Economist (2012) on the change of economic wealth within the U.S and across the globe, this essay hopes to shine a light on how Marx’s views have shaped today’s society and how some of his beliefs, such as the eventual fall of capitalism (Giddens, 1971; Giddens & Held, 1982), were quite wrong.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example that was mentioned in lecture was that factories buy labour power because it values the workers ability to work and what it consumes. The Corporation film was about if corporations had too much power or not. We can compare corporations to football because in football offense has their job to do and defense has their task to do, both positions have a purpose. The purpose of corporation is to be successful and to earn profit. It was mentioned in the film that some companies provides good and services for the environment which can be beneficial. The Corporation film showed externalities example such as: sweatshops, factory fires, unions busting and layoffs. These externalities can have a major impact on individuals because without work there are unable to provide for their family. Capitalist are expanding in today’s society because they are able to get work done faster, more efficiently and effectively by using machines it creates no jobs for individuals specialized in that particular task. The film and the play are somewhat similar due to the fact it is about a business or corporation which is dealing with technology or machines that can replace workers and give more power to the capitalist. Layoffs are becoming more widespread and competitions are more aggressive than ever before. It was shocking that in the film “The Corporation” to see that workers in sweatshops were creating t-shirts for 3 cent and the price sold of the shirt was $14.99. The company or business offering low labour cost to these countries are making profit out of clothes or other numerous…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    GreenWood

    • 2423 Words
    • 23 Pages

    References: A. B. Lovins, L. H. Lovins, P. Hawken (2007) A Road Map for Natural Capitalism.…

    • 2423 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Buchholtz and Caroll (2008) corporate power refers to the ability or capacity to produce an effect or to bring influence to bear on situation or people and it has different levels and spheres. In case of Darwin’s nightmare the level of power is intermediate or macro, since the main actors are firms based on the fishery on Tanzanian coasts of Lake Victoria and the European Union (EU) which has an increasing market for the fish. The spheres of their power being employed in this case are environmental, economic, social/cultural and political.…

    • 5810 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays