Preview

Former President Richard Nixon: Former Citizen Of The United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
393 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Former President Richard Nixon: Former Citizen Of The United States
Former President Richard Nixon is saying in his response to the interviewer, that a president approves of situations thinking he is does what is best for the people of the United States. The president also expects the people to carry out the situation by obeying all laws. Otherwise, the president is asking citizens to break laws and puts the people in charge of these tasks in an impossible position. The Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, says the United States does not torture and only does what is right for it’s people. Rice goes on to say if any citizen had authority at the time of September 11th, they would have done anything in their power to make the United States safe. This seems to be implying that it would have been okay if the president broke laws in this situation. …show more content…
The president is still a citizen of the United States; therefore laws apply to the president too. I do believe the president should have some power to ensure the safety of the people by possibly breaking laws, but this power could easily be abused. Like Richard Nixon, he did not have this power and still abused it. Also, the legislative and judicial branches do not have the power to make these decisions and nobody is considering allowing this. But, the constitution says all branches are equal in power and no branch should have complete control over something. How would the legislative and judicial branch check this power and how would they stop the president form abusing this power? If the country allows the president to break laws now, then eventually the country will allow the president to do something else and eventually the president will gain too much

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The stage was set for a great constitutional struggle between a President determined not to give up executive documents and materials and a Senate committee and a federal prosecutor who are determined to get them," The White House claimed “Executive Privilege” when they refused to disclose the recorded tapes of President Nixon and his aides. Nixon and his advisors became arrogant with their possession of power. The Executive Branch was disrupting the balance of power and the separation of powers written into the Constitution. No Branch, elected official, governmental worker, or even the President is above the law, but Nixon definitely…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Jonathan Alter has written essay titled:”time to think about torture.” Mr. alter refers to the time. It in the United States history as the: “autumn to of anger.” He describes multiple torture methods and gives examples in detail their uses. He refers to the time: Prior to September 11th, “hopelessly September 10th.” Mr. Altar explains that that era of time had many wrong assumptions about law and its enforcement in reference to terrorism. By a vote of 98 to 1 PM The Anti- terrorism bill was passed and history was made. Chief Justice Robert Jackson stated:”the Constitution is not a suicide pact. “This comment by the Chief…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion is I agree that the president has usurped the constitiutional power of the Congress. I agree this statement because he is wielding the most pontent legislative power. The Constitution does quote that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in the Congress of the United States.” Most people agree that he has usurped the Constitiutional Power of Congress. It also seems that the president seems to wield the legislative power. In Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitiution states that the president “shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Congress wields the legislative power and it seems the president is wielding that power.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us. V. Nixon Court Case

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b) Given that the power is not absolute, should President Nixon be capable of claiming executive privilege under the aforementioned circumstances?…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard M. Nixon was the 37th president of the United States of ‘murica. He is the only president in American History to resign from his position in office. He was part of the Watergate scandal but still made many great achievements in his life time. Nixon is certainly a president that will forever be in American History.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the constitution the President has military, legislative, appointment, and diplomatic power. Our framers of the constitution wanted a strong military but not complete seizure of the government. Diplomatic powers and appointment powers are also under senate’s approval. The President’s legislative power can be over ridden by congress so by far this is not one of the power points of presidency. The President has sole powers of pardons granted. Under circumstances of war and terrorism the president engages in the most power.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the United States all the president has the responsibility and the control of everything, because they're the president of the country and they have to be honsty with the people who live in the United States.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reed Broussard Coach Roch Civics 3rd hour 1 March, 2016 U.S. vs. Nixon Many presidents have committed scandals while in office. One of the most public of these scandals was the Watergate Scandal. Because of this scandal, President Richard Nixon was brought to the Supreme Court. What resulted in him being brought to the supreme court was a landmark case.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The president, throughout history, has always been a symbol of the country and has had powers for their title. However, there are only limited things the President can do, while they are in power. For the most part the President has to go through the congress, which might not accept the president’s request. The president should have the power to go beyond the bounds of the Constitution when the country is dealing with war or rebellion, and to take action if the lives of US citizens are in danger or to keep international peace in foreign countries.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Obama

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The president is more than unconstitutional, he is uncontrollable, too. President Obama is uncontrollable in his actions when illegal decisions are made more than once regarding Obamacare and when a large part of our government system is being questioned due to his disregard for the law. Obama went too far to get what he wanted. Checks and balances aren’t being taken seriously, if he can get away with it, so can everyone else. Obama unconstitutionally delayed the caps on payments without approval from Congress. He is uncontrollable and imperial because he shows with these examples that he thinks he can just go around Congress more than once regarding only one piece of legislation…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The answer is yes and no. The Constitution grants that “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America” (pg. 47). This one sentence of the constitution has been disputed since as early as 1793. After over a century of dispute it is affirmed “That the president does possess “residual” or “resultant” powers over and above, or in the consequence of, his specifically granted powers to take temporary alleviative action in the presence of serious emergency.” (pg. 49). So now, what qualifies as an “emergency”? President Trump could feel that the threat of rapists from Mexico and terrorists from the Middle East is too great to ignore, thus its an emergency and he must act. In reality, Trump is authorized to build a wall and revive the pipelines going through Native Land. The thing he is not authorized to do, is ban people based on religion. The constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (Amendment 1) thus Trump has directly contradicted the constitution, some will say that this is dictator-like behavior. But here's the thing, Congress can reverse it all, that is why this nation was built on checks and balances. While the President does not need the approval from congress to instate an executive order, “his powers may be augmented by congress”(pg. 50) if they feel the President has acted…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In general society and everything has become more complicated, more laws have been passed. Every one passes the buck and doesn’t want to take responsibility and plays the “blame game”. It is gridlock in Washington DC, the bureaucracy has grown vast and complex, nothing gets done. But if Presidential powers are rolled back the office of the Presidency will lose credibility, power and respect. Public opinion regarding the president’s job performance influences presidential power; the higher the public approval, the more power the chief executive has to influence others within the political system, including Congress. The President may have charisma and influence, but the real power comes from Congress. The Constitution is supposed to prevent…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liberty vs Security

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the founding fathers created the government of the United States, they wanted the government not to be so constricting with its rule. In other words, freedom, but freedom in its purest can be dangerous so they had to put some security to their newly made country. They did this by giving the executive branch the power to enforce laws and keep the peace. In the beginning, it was all good but things have changed throughout the years where security had to be increased. Now-a-days, some people think security has been increase to such a point that there isn’t fair anymore but that just isn’t the case. There is now terrorism in the world people live in and the Executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to stay safe. With the Obama Administration’s war on terror, the executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to keep the nation safe with drone attacks, warrantless wiretapping, and advanced interrogation techniques.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays