In paragraph seven Andrea
In paragraph seven Andrea
Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…
4. Evidence is important to forensic science because it helps solve the crime and it contributes DNA to find the criminal. The evidence important in the episodes was the broken glass, the green goo, and mostly the blue dog beer can.…
Evidence is crucial in forensic science because it can help solve crimes and clues in mysteries. We can find out who killed people in order to establish safety or solve crimes such as burglaries. All the evidence we had found played an important role in…
Evidence is important because it gives ideas of what happened in the crime. It also helps you determine the facts behind the crime. The beer bottle was a piece of evidence…
Physical evidence is anything that can establish a crime has happened and anything that leads the crime to the criminal. Law enforcement may collect physical evidence not only from the crime scene, but also from a person's body and/or property (home, car,etc). Some examples include weapons, fibers, and hair.…
The prosecution case against the main suspect, Michael Shirley, consisted of four circumstantial pieces of evidence. Forensic evidence is evidence obtained by scientific methods. In the case of Linda Cook, methods used included extracting impressions and DNA. An Athletic shoe impression was found on Cook’s abdomen, sizing at 43-45 and was the right foot. This shoe had a distinctive tread pattern including the obvious impression of the word ‘Flash’ located in the heel. The suspect owned a pair of size 44 athletic shoes with the same tread and stated that he “may” have been wearing them on the night of Linda Cook’s murder. The difficult aspect of locating shoe impressions in forensic cases is that 96% of impressions aren’t used as sufficient forensic evidence (Moles & Sangha 2003). Only 250 pairs of these shoes had been sold in…
Forensic evidence has been used since the beginning of investigating. It could be anything from ammunition, to a handprint on the door, to the drops of blood on the crime scene. As seen in “Forensic Evidence” by Andrea Campbell, the indisputable forensic evidence is the best kind to use in a trial.…
1. Physical evidence is anything that can establish a crime has happened and anything that links the crime a criminal. Three types of physical evidence would be weapons, fibers, and hairs.…
Physical evidence is anything that can prove a crime has happened and is connected to the crime and connected to the criminal. Three examples that can be listed as physical evidence would be a knife covered in blood, hair fiber, and a shoe impression. All three can be linked to the crime and to the person who committed the crime.…
Physical evidence is anything that can establish a crime has occurred and anything that links the crime to a criminal. Three examples of physical evidence are fibers, weapons, and hair.…
1.Physical evidence is any evidence that can establish a crime has happened and anything that links the crime and the criminal, and three examples of physical evidence is: weapon, fibers, and hair.…
Evidence can be as diverse as people; however, when looking to collect any type of evidence, it will typically be separated into one of two categories: real evidence or testimonial. Real evidence is considered to be tangible, such as, it will be anything that the five senses can perceive (Worral, Hemmens, & Nored, 2012, p. 71). Articles of clothing, weapons, contracts or legal documentation, and photographs are all examples of tangible / real evidence. Additionally, within this same category of real evidence, “demonstrative” evidence will also be included. This type of evidence would be anything that can actually demonstrate the crime and/or scene. For example, a technician…
The CSI effect is a belief held by law enforcement personal and prosecutors that forensic science television shows such as CSI: Miami, influence and over dramatize the belief that Americas jurors have to expect more forensic evidence in order to convict defendants (Roberts, 2017). This is a relatively big problem because there are a lot of cases where physical evidence is not as plentiful as many of these television shows depict. According to Donald Shelton (2008), “46 percent expect to see some kind of scientific evidence in every case, 22 percent expected to see DNA evidence in every criminal case, 36 percent expected to see fingerprint evidence in every criminal case, and 32 percent expected to see ballistic or other firearms laboratory evidence in every criminal case.” The issue behind these statistics is that not all cases have this kind of evidence. Some cases have more evidence that is collected by detectives such as witness statements and other circumstantial evidence. I believe that CSI effect is still valid today and people should be educated in some why as to how it an investigation actually works in the real world before taking on jury duties. They should know that things like DNA and other lab results don’t come back in 30 seconds and that there isn’t always cut and dry evidence to make a verdict.…
1. Please name the four pieces of evidence that you collected at the crime scene. Explain whether you would classify them as physical evidence, documentary evidence, demonstrative evidence, or testimonial evidence and why. ? the evidence I found is some blood and partial fingerprint and a fibers of clothing and shoe print and all the evidence I found was physical evidence because physical evidence includes weapons and hair blood or fibers and fingerprints.…
Does all evidences can be used to convict a person? Circumstantial evidence is an indirect evidence that relies on connection with a particular case, but can’t be used as a proving alone. People have different thought of should circumstantial evidence can be use to convict a person. In my opinion, circumstantial evidence should never use for declaration of guilt because of the following reason. First, it is not credible. Second, It does not contain any or non scientific analysis. Last but not least, Because of circumstantial evidence, many innocent people are punished.…