Preview

Ford and Firestone's Tire Recall: The Costliest Information Gap in History

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2969 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ford and Firestone's Tire Recall: The Costliest Information Gap in History
Ford and Firestone's Tire Recall: The Costliest Information Gap in History

On August 9, 2000, Bridgestone/Firestone Inc. announced it would recall more than 6.5 million tires, most of which had been mounted as original equipment on Ford Motor Co. Explorers and other Ford light trucks. Bridgestone/Firestone had become the subject of an intense federal investigation of 46 deaths and more than 300 incidents where Firestone tires allegedly shredded on the highway. The Firestone tires affected were 15-inch Radial ATX and Radial ATX II tires produced in North America and certain Wilderness AT tires manufactured at the firm's Decatur, Illinois, plant. This tire recall was the second biggest in history, behind only Firestone's recall of 14.5 million radial tires in 1978. The 1978 tire recall financially crippled the company for years to come and the August 2000 recall threatened to do the same. Consumers, the federal government, and the press wanted to know: Why didn't Ford and Firestone recognize this problem sooner? Let us look at the series of events surrounding the tire recall and the role of information management.
1988---Financially weakened from its 1978 tire recall, Firestone agreed to be acquired by Bridgestone Tires, a Japanese firm. To increase its sales, Firestone became a supplier of tires for Ford Motors' new sport-utility vehicle (SUV), the Explorer.

March 11, 1999---In response to a Ford concern about tire separations on the Explorer, Bridgestone/Firestone (Firestone) sent a confidential memo to Ford claiming that less than 0.1 percent of all Wilderness tires (which are used on the Explorer) had been returned under warranty for all kinds of problems. The note did not list tire separations separately but did say this "rate of return is extremely low and substantiates [Firestone's] belief that this tire performs exceptionally well in the U.S. market."
August 1999---Ford Motors announced a recall in 16 foreign countries of all tires that had shown a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the latest recalls involves two companies, which are the Ford Motor Company and Firestone. About 290,000 Firestone tires will be replaced on Ford cars; this action was taken after several accidents happened. Some of the accidents were associated with the death of the drivers. Firestone and Ford Motor’s reputation and public image were affected after this recall (Hakim, 2004).…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited is a Canadian corporation that offers goods and services that meet life’s everyday needs. The corporation has an interrelated network business engaged in retailing goods, apparel, petroleum, and the financial and automotive services. The company was founded in 1922 by J. William Billes and Alfred J. Billes in Toronto, Ontario. Today, Canadian Tire Corporation has grown to a diverse network of business with more than 1,200 general merchandise and apparel retail stores and gas bars, as well as a major financial services provider. With more than 58,000 employees, the red triangle becomes one of the nation’s most trusted brands.…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The tire industry is a very competitive industry to be in. It's all about the low that can be provided for the clientele as well as the convenience of a short wait time for a vehicle to be worked on. They rely heavily on the ability to bring in new clients and to wow the…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Canadian Tire

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Strauss, MARINA. "The Globe and Mail." The Globe and Mail. N.p., 07 Mar. 2013. Web. 19 Mar. 2013. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/goodbye-big-box-canadian-tire-thinks-small-to-take-on-giant-target/article9382548/…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Blowout Company

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tires, Inc., a California corporation, at its store in Half Moon Bay, California. The Blowout Company and Goodstone…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company has been one of the largest and best-selling automotive tire companies since the growth of the automotive industry in the early 1900’s. In early 1992, Goodyear company executives were reconsidering a proposal made by Sears management about carrying and selling Goodyear’s tires.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Pinto Case

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    not receive notice of the recall until 1979. The prosecutor from Elkhart County, Indiana, sued Ford…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1101IBA Toyota

    • 1714 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “We deeply regret the inconvenience and concern caused to our customers and others by our recent recalls of multiple vehicle models across multiple regions.” – Aki Toyoda, the CEO of Toyota Motor Corporation1 (Toyota website). Beside the regretful expression we can learn from this public release, it also implies that Toyota, one of the world’s largest automakers, is suffering in their recent recalls of millions of vehicles round the world. Safety recalls are common issues occurring in the automobile industry, few may have long run impact on the automakers involved if handled correctly. However, in this case, the disaster engulfing Toyota is of a different order (The Economist, Feb.6, 2010). Toyota’s quality brand has been scrutinised and at risk due to its sedans’ safety problems that have sequentially emerged recently.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Were both companies responsible for what happened? Were government regulations administered through the National Highway Traffic Safety…

    • 5382 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fireside Tire Company

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Coyle, J., Langley, J.C., Gibson, B.J., Novack, R.A., and Bardi, E.J. (2008). Supply Chain Management: A logistics perspective. South-Western Publishing. Mason, Ohio…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timeline Of Ford Essay

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire LLC agrees to pay Ford $240 million to help cover the costs of the tire recalls, which amounted to $2 billion.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Kate Rego Nicole Montanaro Outline of presentation Overview • Goodyear was founded in Akron, Ohio in 1898 by Frank and Charles Seiberling. • In 1992 Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company were reconsidering a proposal from Sears, initially denied in 1989, to sell their Eagle brand tires. • Two factors contributed to the reconsideration of the sears proposal – decline in market share – Goodyear brand tires were being replaced annually at Sears Auto Centers. Industry Summary •…

    • 816 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Signs of the impending recall crisis began as early as 2006 when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) initiated an investigation into driver reports of “surging” in Toyota’s Camry models. This investigation was closed the next year declaring that there were no defects. Known in the industry for their quality and reliability, Toyota would silently recall almost nine million Toyota and Lexus models due to the sudden acceleration problems. Because of the lingering reaction in dealing with these problems, Toyota’s leadership had been highly ridiculed, so now they had a big job in identifying the solution that would make sure of the safety of their vehicles and reinstate consumer confidence, as well as protecting the Toyota brand and salvaging the dropping share prices.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Pinto Case Brief

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was strong competition for Ford in the American small-car market from Volkswagen and several Japanese companies in the 1960’s. To fight the competition, Ford rushed its newest car the Pinto into production in much less time than it usually required to develop a car. The regular time to produce an automobile is 43 months; Ford took 25 months. Before production however, Ford engineers discovered a major flaw in the cars design. In nearly all rear-end crash test collisions, the Pinto's fuel system would rupture extremely easily. The technology was available to make the Pinto a safer vehicle. The best method for improving the safety of the Pinto was to line the gas tank with a rubber bladder. Ford alleged that it would cost $11 per car to add any sort of gas tank fire prevention device. Lee Iacocca, who was in charge of the development of the Pinto, had specifications for the design of the car that were uncompromisable. These specifications were that "the Pinto was not to weigh an ounce over 2,000 pounds and not cost a cent over $2,000." Any modifications, even if it did provided extra safety for the customer that brought the car closer to the Iacocca’s limits were rejected. A report was prepared for NHTSA by consultant; Eugene Trisko entitled "A National Survey of Motor Vehicle Fires." His report indicates that the Ford Motor Company makes 24 percent of the cars on the American road, yet these cars account for 42 percent of the collision-ruptured fuel tanks. Another staggering fact that was discovered was that a large and growing number of corpses taken from burned cars involved in rear-end crashes contained no cuts, bruises or broken bones. They clearly would have survived the accident unharmed if the cars had not caught fire. There was no single event that caused all of the deaths and injuries related to Pinto’s. Ford had many opportunities to limit the damage done by the faulty design of the Pinto. Engineers bowed to pressure from…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The European tyre industry is very unique. Primarily dominated by Michelin, there are several other competitors that hold a strong, consistent market share and brand awareness. Bridgestone is not one of these companies; Bridgestone’s current marketing strategies in Europe are not at all effective. Currently, Bridgestone’s market share and brand awareness in Europe rate among the lowest of tyre manufacturers; if Bridgestone would like to continue to hold 20% of the global market share (highest w/ Michelin), they must address this issue promptly.…

    • 9739 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics