Preview

Flippery Slope Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flippery Slope Analysis
1.Slippery Slope
The first fallacy is an example of a Slippery Slope (Ad Nauseam or Ad Absurdum).
A Slippery slope is when someone’s course of action leads to something unrealistic or outrageous.
The character in Twelve Angry Men who committed this fallacy was Yankee.
Yankee said “Suppose this whole building fell on my head. You can suppose anything.”
Yankee’s claim was a Slippery Slope because it created a domino effect in the movie, because the Architect supposes the jurors could have been wrong, then Yankee could have supposed that the building could fall on his head. For example, he should have done was say that there is a possibility that they could all be wrong. Without referring to the building he would not have committed a fallacy.
…show more content…
He makes a false conclusion within his own statement, all of the other jurors noticed this at this point. These are the final words of the Man with a Cold before he goes and sits in a corner.

3. Appeal to Emotions
The third fallacy is an example of an Appeal to Emotions (Ad Misericordiam)
An appeal to emotions is when the debater attempts to win an argument by trying to get an emotional reaction from the opponent.
The character in Twelve Angry Men who committed this fallacy was the Architect.
The Architect says “He’s only eighteen years old” to further defend the boy’s case.
The Architect’s statement is an appeal to emotions because he was attempting to use emotion, sympathy, that the boy is barely an adult. This is a fact in the trial, but nothing to assume that he is innocent. He could have avoided committing this fallacy by saying he is eighteen, and follow up with facts about the crime that prove the boy’s innocence.
It is important to recognize an Appeal to Emotions because for example, in the Presidential Debates the candidates will use emotional statements to draw out certain emotions to make people feel or act a certain way. For example, Donald Trump makes America the victim when talking about how all of our jobs are disappearing. Trump is bringing out fear and rage from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Ungry Man Essay

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror# 8: The architect is a very patient and gentle man with a high conscience of what is right and wrong. He feels a high responsibility on how his bad judgment could send an innocent man to die. Therefore he is showing to the rest of the jury his feeling about it and at the same time is asking question to every juror in order to let them for themselves analyzed in details the evidence and why are they saying the young man is guilty without living space to a reasonable doubt. His strategy was asking questions and leasing carefully what others have to say.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think using emotional appeals in persuasive writing is unethical for some reasons. First, when I use emotional appeals in persuasive writing, I am not allowing the reader to decide rationally and logically because I have effect on his or her emotions. On the other hand, using emotional appeals in persuasive writing can be ethnic in one case. This case is if the content of the persuasive writing is important to the reader, here emotional appeals should be used.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the movie, one or two jurors had plans to go to a baseball game. A few others have plans with family and friends. Most everyone was ready get out of there as soon as possible. When being rushed, your mind tends to blur around the facts as well as your temper being shortened. This caused many of the jurors to lose their temper, sending the group into outraged arguments. Let’s say the jurors were not irritable, but instead had clear heads, and relaxed emotions. I’m sure the first response would be to think about it reasonably. The questionable trial would have been debated smoother with much less arguments. Having fewer disagreements, the trial’s outcome may have turned out differently. The boy was let go innocent, but only after hours of debating the matter. If the conditions in which they were debating the trial were changed for the better, the outcome could have easily been different. They could have all agreed at once that he was guilty; they could have all agreed much quicker that he was innocent. Better conditions may have allowed for different first time impressions of the trial, and led to a better conversation on what side to vote for.…

    • 389 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is an emotional appeal because emotions are used to prove a point and persuade people to believe him. A emotional appeal is a way to persuade people using emotion. A logical appeal is a way to prove a point using factual information and evidence.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror 3 In 12 Angry Men

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anybody says a thing like that the way he said it - they mean it.'' When Juror 3 yells at the other jurors, ''This kid is guilty! He's got to burn! We're letting him slip through our fingers,'' Juror 8 accuses him of being a sadist. Juror 3 lunges at Juror 8 and shouts at him that he is going to kill him, which thereby disproves Juror 3's earlier statement about people not saying things they don't…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosecutor states “I accuse the prisoner of behaving at his mother’s funeral in a way that showed he was already a criminal at heart.” Camus says that the…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juror 3 is the last to change his note because of his grudge against kids this grudge started him and his son had a fight and his son left home ever since juror 3 has had prejudice against kids, when juror 3 says “That goddamn rotten kid. I know him. What they’re like. What they do to you. How they kill you everyday. My God, don’t you see? How come I’m the only one who sees? Jeez, I can feel that knife going in.” this proves that juror 3 thinks he knows every kid in the whole world and knows that they are disrespectful and unthankful. In other words prejudice. When he says “Jeez, I can feel that knife going in” this shows that he is so shore of the boy committing the crime even thou the boy was found innocent in the end, showing that prejudice did lead juror 3 away from the truth there for proving the point that prejudice does obscure the truth.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men is a movie about 12 jury members who meet to decide the fate of a boy accused for murder of his father. The jury members were invited by the court and were assembled in a room to make the decision. The movie starts with initial voting in which odds are in favour of boy being guilty by 11-1. One man among the whole jury thinks that there may be a chance that boy is really innocent and all the facts that were presented in court can just be misinterpretation of the situation. He was not satisfied with the current evidences and wanted to have a relook before they make a final call. The way he put his thoughts in front of 11 other jury members…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, in the religious places, I often find “Appeal to Emotion” fallacy to persuade people for specific religious activities.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emotion is a very effective method of manipulation. We see it come to play when Cassius talks to Brutus about Caesar’s terrifying political ambition:…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men speech

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the more substantial evidence given at the trial was an eye witness by an old man who stated he heard the boy yell at his father saying he was going to kill him, and then ten seconds later run down the stairs and out the building. This was a crucial part of the case against the accused, although no one questioned the old mans ability to relocate these events. The flaw of this was pointed out yet again by the man who voted not guilty. He suggests to reenact the old man who walks particularly slow to decided how exactly he was able to see the boy run out of the apartment. After seeing that it is almost impossible for the old man to get outside his room to see the boy run out, the jury slowly starts to change their votes, due to reasonable doubt.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Fallacies

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    » to his father and that the old man who testified in court, saw the boy running down the stairs and that he heard the body fall. Through critical thought and analysing the evidence piece by piece, it was pointed out that, since the murder took place during the passing of a train, the old man could not have possibly heard the body fall and that it took him too long to cross his room and open the door for him to have seen the boy after committing the murder. Still juror number three voted guilty saying he had no reasonable doubt that «the boy said ‘I’m going to kill you’ and he killed him» at this point he was using circular reasoning, restating his claim as a…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advertising Appeals Essay

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An emotional appeal is related to an individual’s psychological and social needs for purchasing certain products and services. Many consumers are emotionally motivated or driven to make certain purchases. Advertisers aim to cash in on the emotional appeal and this works particularly well where there is not much difference between multiple product brands and its offerings. Emotional appeal includes personal and social aspects.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Listening and Response

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For example, imagine that someone says "Why did you do that -- you always do that just to annoy me!" At that point, the recipient of the statement must focus on what was done, not the emotion in the statement. They should focus on what they have done that annoyed the person and how it can be fixed, not on the fact that the person has attacked them personally.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dicto Simpliciter Fallacy is and argument based on an unqualified generalization. Contradictory Premises fallacy is when the premises of an argument contradict each other. Ad Misericoriam I thought was a little like Red Herring (aka Straw Man). In the story the author gave an example of how a man went for a job interview, and when asked for his qualifications, he gave him a sympathy speech. It was almost like he avoided the subject at hand. The next fallacy, Hypothesis Contrary to Fact, is when you have an untrue hypothesis and then supportable conclusions are drawn from this false hypothesis. The last fallacy learned in the story was Poisoning the Well. This was like making a generalization before anything has even happened for you to assume that.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays