Preview

Five Ethical Standards for Researchers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Five Ethical Standards for Researchers
There are five ethical standards researchers must follow: protection of participants, informed consent, deception, debriefing and confidentiality. These standards form the backbone of ethical standards for researchers. They provide a fair foundation for all research work for the participant and for the researcher.
Protection of participants is the ethical standard by which no participant is harmed physically or harmed psychologically. This means participants should not be exposed to greater risks than they would ordinarily be exposed in their regular life (Brown, Cozby, Kee & Worden, 1998).
Informed consent requires all participants be provided with full disclosure of the purpose of the study, risks of the study as well as the right to end participation in the study. This should be done before the study so the participant can make an informed decision regarding whether to continue on with the study. In the case of children, parents can give consent for the child since the child may not understand what is going on (Brown, Cozby, Kee & Worden, 1998).
Deception is the standard for giving participants an accurate account of the purpose of the study. It serves to keep researchers from telling a participant they are in one role in the study while the researcher intends to study the individual for a completely different reason (Brown, Cozby, Kee & Worden, 1998). This is why it is important to fully disclose the purpose of the study when obtaining informed consent. Debriefing is necessary to fulfill professional responsibility to the subjects in the study. It is intended to remove any negative effects of participation (Brown, Cozby, Kee & Worden, 1998) in the experiment. This procedure helps insure the participant was not harmed in any way from participating in the study.
Confidentiality is an important standard to make sure the participant’s name is not released with any results of the study (Brown, Cozby, Kee & Worden, 1998). Irreparable harm can be done to



References: Brown, K. W., Cozby, P. C., Kee, D. W. & Worden, P. E. (1998). Research Methods in Human Development (2nd ed.). Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Is3350 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ethical consideration must be high on the agenda in public health since epidemiological findings are socially relevant, often publically funded and the research is conducted on human subjects. As discussed previously, there are two broad types of studies in epidemiology; the observational studies which include the cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies and the experimental study or randomized clinical trial. As a policy writer and programme designer, I am obligated to ensure that investigators and researchers obtain informed consent from their subjects, where possible, and that there is privacy and…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two ethical issues associated with psychological testing are confidentiality and informed consent. Confidentiality deals with keeping the patient or examinees information confidential and private. Leaking the examinee or patient’s personal information is a violation of what constitutes ethical practice because there is a trust that is built between the examiner and examinee. Informed consent deals with whether the patient or examinee is willing and knowing that they are being examined and studied. Some tests may call for an examinee not knowing that they are being examined, but it is important to allow the examinee to have the general knowledge that they are about to or currently are being examined. It is unethical to study and watch someone without their knowing that they are partaking in such as study.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harm must not come to the participants (APA Standard 3.04 / BPS Ethical Principle 3.3)…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Psychology Unit 3

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which of the following ethical considerations in research ensures that any information gathered about a participant during research must not be revealed without that person’s consent?…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these occasions, when it is necessary for scientific reasons to conduct a study without fully informing participants of the true purpose of the study prior to the commencement, the researcher must ensure that participants do not suffer distress from the research procedures. In all cases involving deception, participants must be immediately debriefed at the conclusion of the study.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuskegee Study Inhumane

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Respect for persons means that researchers must obtain voluntary informed consent from participants in the study. Informed consent is achieved when participants are given accurate information about the potential risks and treatment options available. In addition, participants should be able to freely choose to begin or stop the study at any time.(1) The Tuskegee study did not fully disclose information to the participants. They told participants they were being treated for bad blood despite the fact that they were specifically studying the effects…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deception refers to deliberately withholding and misleading information to the participant (“Deception Topics,” n.d.). Using deliberate deception to get an individual to participate in a study is always unethical, though not all research can be done without deception. For example, if researchers believe the participants may change their behavior if they know details, those details may be intentionally left out. If this occurs, researchers must provide alternate designs and procedures of the study. If there are no alternatives, the researchers must be able to justify their use of deception (“Deception Topics,” n.d.). Some researchers believe that deception is necessary, at times, to maintain validity, although other researcher’s feel it is always unacceptable (“Deception Topics,”…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grady, C. (2010). Do IRBs protect human research participants? JAMA, 304(10), 1122-1123. Retrieved from http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=186530…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychologists have an obligation to two sets of people, one to the participants; they must ensure that the participant does not come to any harm as a result of the study and leave in the state that they entered (otherwise known as the ethical cost) and secondly the researcher has an obligation to seek and share knowledge which will better the human race (known as the scientific benefit).…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Test subjects are told of the deception as soon as possible without affecting the experiments outcome. They are debriefed after the study to make sure they will not have any bad effects. Most psychologists are against opposed to the use of deception.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APA Ethical Issues

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    – Deception allows opportunities to investigate behaviors and mental processes not easily studied using nondeceptive methods.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cross Sectional Studies

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When the participants have been gathered, the researcher will give an informed consent to satisfy the ethical standards.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research and Participants

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To keep a study ethical researchers must keep the identity of the participants confidential. The researcher must make sure the identities of the participants private to prevent any possible negative effects that may happen to them in the future. They must keep all personal information totally confidential even if it would make the conclusion; when it is published, better. This leads on to the fact that the researcher must be aware…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Informed consent is a process, not just a form. Information must be presented to enable potential participants to voluntarily decide whether or not to participate in a research project. It is a fundamental mechanism to ensure respect for persons through provision of thoughtful consent for a voluntary act. The procedures used in obtaining informed consent should be designed to educate the participant population in terms that they can understand. Therefore, informed consent language and its documentation (especially explanation of the study's purpose, duration, experimental procedures, alternatives, risks, and benefits) must be written in "lay language", (i.e. understandable to the people being asked to participate) at a reading level no higher than fifth grade.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When conducting any type of psychological research, the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics codes comes into effect. Every researcher or scientist is obligated to follow the standards set in the ethics codes. There are many ethical standards that need to be upheld when dealing with research. Researchers must see if the research or study meets the ethical standards. There are many ways of conducting research and gathering data. Some ways are considered ethical and appropriate ways to gather data while other ways are deemed unethical. Deception and misrepresenting oneself in order to obtain data is a controversial issue on whether it is ethical or unethical to obtain data in this manner. In this paper, ethics will be defined, the concept of risk/benefit ratio will be discussed, Deception and misrepresenting in research will be discussed, and evaluating the impact deception and misrepresenting oneself has on psychological research.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays