Preview

Fiscal Cliff

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiscal Cliff
“Fiscal cliff” is the popular shorthand term used to describe the conundrum that the U.S. government will face at the end of 2012, when the terms of the Budget Control Act of 2011 are scheduled to go into effect.
Three hours before the midnight deadline on January 1, the Senate agreed to a deal to avert the fiscal cliff. The Senate version passed two hours after the deadline, and the House of Representatives approved the deal 21 hours later. The government technically went "over the cliff," since the final details weren't hashed out until after the beginning of the New Year, but the changes incorporated in the deal were backdated to January 1. The key elements of the deal are: an increase in the payroll tax by two percentage points to 6.2% for income up to $113,700, and a reversal of the Bush tax cuts for individuals making more than $400,000 and couples making over $450,000 (which entails the top rate reverting from 35% to 39.5%). Investment income is also affected, with an increase in the tax on investment income from 15% to 23.8% for filers in the top income bracket and a 3.8% surtax on investment income for individuals earning more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000. The deal also gives U.S. taxpayers greater certainty regarding the alternative minimum tax, and a number of popular tax breaks - such as the exemption for interest on municipal bonds - remain in place. The fiscal cliff agreement is good news to some extent, although it shouldn't be ignored that lawmakers had 507 days (since the August, 2011 debt ceiling agreement) to address this problem, but still came down to the final hours before they were able to reach a solution - an unnecessary, self-inflicted burden on the economy and financial markets. What's more, the agreement addressed only the revenue side (taxes) but postponed any discussion of spending cuts - the so-called "sequester" - until March 1. The fiscal cliff was a concern for investors and business since the highly

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With the start of the new fiscal year for the federal government (October 1) it's a good time to clarify some items that previously may have been unclear.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "The House of Representatives is expected to vote on the tax deal passed by the Senate on Thursday or Friday. The bill was the result of a deal cut between President Barack Obama and Republican congressional leaders. Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution states: ’All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills’” (Ballasy, 2010).…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the most well respected Democratic presidents in history, John Kennedy, stated in a 1963 speech on fiscal responsibility: This Government considers our tax reduction and reform program"�to be the most important action that Congress can take now to improve our long-range position. Another Bush proposal to end the double taxation of dividends from corporations will encourage companies to issue dividends to their stockholders. There are many other statistics that emphasize the benefits of the Reagan tax cuts, but the few listed above show the advantages of what cutting taxes can do for the economy. Therefore, it is impossible to design a tax cut of any size that would appear to only benefit the poor. The idea of tax cuts stimulating the…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aside from having the largest benefit for the wealthy population, the Bush tax cuts were also controversial for a multitude of reasons. These tax cuts forced the government, Congress in particular, to make a variety of changes and adaptations to the new financial situation they would find themselves in. Due to the decrease in revenue the government would be receiving in taxes, Alterations in spending had to be expected. According to Isaac Shapiro, the Bush tax cuts “have been a major contributor to the dramatic shift from large projected budget surpluses to projected deficits as far as the eye can see.” This is largely due to the amount of government spending not properly adjusting to the reduced budget cause from the tax act. The surplus which…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bush signed a $1.35 trillion tax cut into law. Although the amount falls short of the $1.60 trillion the administration has been seeking, the bill does slash income tax rates across the board and provides for the gradual elimination of the estate tax. American voters did not think that President Bush cared enough about domestic issues. Some say Bush did not "selling" his achievements more successfully and running an inept campaign in 1992. He alienated the more conservative wing of the Republican Party in a variety of ways including breaking his promise not to raise taxes and cutting military…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    and twenty-five tax cuts have been put in place. President Obama suggested two million more people would be unemployed without the recovery act money spent by the government…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's a political perfect storm: The pairing of a government shutdown with the rollout of a big chunk of the health care law is illustrating all sorts of partisan and cultural tensions that are roiling America. Big government vs. small. The Republican Party's identity crisis. Sharpening political divisions among Americans. And plenty more.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fiscal Policy

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the current economic recession, the United States’ fiscal policy has placed unrest and instability among the population. The positive and negative outcomes of the fiscal policy, with regard to the country’s deficit, surplus, and debt, have different effects on how many different people and organizations view the current economy, make decisions, and react to changes. The Unites States’ deficit, surplus, and debt affect not just the American tax payers but also future social security and Medicare users, unemployed individuals, students, exporters, and importers. The deficit, surplus, and debt also affect the gross domestic product (GDP) and also the United State’s financial reputation on an international level. Focus must be placed on making objective decisions that will provide both short-term and long-term benefits especially during economic uncertainty. Individual decisions during a recession has a great impact on the economy collectively; when people reinvest and increase spending in the tough economy, it can propel the economy towards the upward trend.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taxes are going up as another result of this health care act. “The taxes that may affect you directly are the individual mandate and the employer mandate.” (Obamacarefacts.com 2016) There were several new taxes that were made to help pay for Obamacare including taxes on pharmaceutical sales and medical device. People with high income also got an additional tax put on them. Some other cons of Obamacare include enrolling complications, businesses cutting employees hours to avoid having to give them coverage, and higher costs. Some people have gotten stuck paying more for Obamacare than they did under their previous health care plans. “ A heavily cited (and debated) 2013 Associated Press report estimated that the health insurance policies of 4.7 million Americans were canceled due to noncompliance with Obamacare standards going into the inaugural year.” (Elizabeth Renter 2014). Many opponents of Obamacare believe that legislation will demolish jobs, hours are being cut and full-time employees are becoming slim. About 1.2% of the population will mainly be paying the tax rather than the health insurance they should be paying for because the taxes are getting so…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In most cases, as long as the good outweighs the bad, then at the end of the day that is all that really matters. In the large picture, Americans now have the chance at having affordable health care, and cannot be denied over prior history. People can now avoid being put in massive amounts of debt by avoiding the high cost of procedures that they need. No one should ever deny the care they need when it comes to their health. In the long run it may cost companies more money, but if they make money off of their employees, they should be willing to pay for them to remain healthy. Within the next ten years we will truly see if the good outweighs the bad. In my opinion, Obamacare is headed in the right direction, but I do not feel the bill was ready to be passed. With all the opposition to incorporating socialized health care it is understandable why Obama was pushing it through while he is in office, because it may have not went through if it waited much longer. There are also a large number of benefits with the Affordable Health Care Act, people now can purchase affordable health care and not be denied due to pre-existing conditions. I also feel the government should have raised taxes to cover the cost, instead of Americans paying monthly for their insurance. We tend to not miss what is already gone, and this is what other countries have done. People have to pay taxes, so no one would ever…

    • 2608 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    pop squad

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rising health-care costs are at the core of the United States ' long-term fiscal imbalance. Social Security costs, by comparison, are projected to increase from five percent of GDP to six percent over the same period. It is no exaggeration to say that the United States ' standing in the world depends on its success in constraining this health-care cost explosion; unless it does, the country will eventually face a severe fiscal crisis or a crippling inability to invest in other areas." Foreign Affairs In this article, Peter R. Orszag, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, argues that "there is no credible path to reducing the long-term fiscal imbalance in the United States other than directly addressing high-cost cases in health care."…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taxes are a big part of the government and economy. Donald Trump wants Americans to keep more of their money in their pockets and he wants to increase after-tax wages. Trump wants to add more jobs to the country and making America globally competitive again. Obama said "We have to set priorities. If we want a strong middle class, then our tax code must reflect our values." President Obama has passed a wide-ranging tax relief, but it is complicated and has multiple loopholes that mostly benefit the wealthy. A family making $50,000 a year received tax cuts equal $3,600 in President Obama’s first term, more if they were putting a child through college.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Teen Drug Abuse

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One combination: a $1 billion increase in government spending and a $5 billion tax cut. Alternatively, one could raise both government spending and taxes by $25 billion.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Debt

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It took a while for the administration of Obama to initialize action about America’s enormously increasing debt. Given that the country has mounting debts, it would be difficult shrink it down.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gallon

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    House Republicans abruptly cancelled plans to take up a revised budget proposal Tuesday evening after leaders struggled to round up votes, leading Senate negotiators to resume bipartisan talks in hopes of reaching a deal before Thursday's debt ceiling deadline. House GOP leaders, after a closed door session, announced there would be no votes Tuesday night. With that decision, focus shifted back to the Senate and talks between Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and his Republican counterpart, Sen. Mitch McConnell. A spokesman for Reid issued a statement late Tuesday saying, "Senator Reid and Senator McConnell have re-engaged in negotiations and are optimistic that an agreement is within reach."The emerging framework on the Senate side would raise the debt ceiling through February, and include a spending bill meant to last through Jan. 15. That version would not include any provision relating to the Obama Care medical device tax.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays