Preview

First Past the Post

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
565 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
First Past the Post
First Past The Post Essay.
FPTP is the only electoral system which the UK should use for general elections. Discuss.
First Past the Post is the current voting system used in the UK for general elections whereby the nation elects MP’s into the House of Commons. This particular voting system is based on each area of the constituency being represented by the elected MP. The candidate with the most votes in each constituency becomes its MP.
I feel that depends on your own view of democracy, but I think that the main reason many people feel that the FPTP electoral is unfair is because of the fact that the candidate/MP can be elected as representative of the constituency by a minority vote. I feel that this obviously doesn’t truly reflect who the populous wants to represent the constituency.
In Addition, a large number of votes cast are also wasted because the voter simply did not vote for the candidate who won the election as the winning candidate may have won by a minority vote. Once again, this is clear example that the FPTP electoral system is ineffective in terms of giving voters what they actually want.
However, I do understand that the FPTP electoral system is favoured by some for being simple to use and understand. For a vote to be valid, all that is required from the voter is an ‘X’ beside the name the single member of the one candidate they wish to be elected. Under PR electoral systems, voters may have to choose between a number of candidates presented by a party whereas the simplicity of FPTP allows voters to assess the performance of an individual candidate.
In FPTP, one party may win all the seats in a constituency. If the support for a party is strong in a certain part of the country, a vast amount of votes will win most if not all the seats in the legislature for that area. This then excludes a minority in that area from representation and reinforces the perception that politics favours the status quo and has disregard for any belief of someone

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    AQA GOVP1 past papers

    • 1601 Words
    • 10 Pages

    10: Using your own knowledge as well as the passage, explain why the First-Past-the-Post system has rarely resulted in coalition government at Westminster.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This occurs because the plurality rules in our system only allow the candidate with the most votes to win and this creates a situation similar to the 1987 British elections where a party may get 23% of the vote but get lees than 4% of the seats because the party won a plurality in very few regions. The author also says the current system heavily undermines third parties because it creates a cyclic effect with negative effects on the ability of the third parties to be politically viable internationally. The cyclic effect on the third parties starts with their low chance of being elected so they don't attract good politicians or good contributions because businesses feel it's a waste of money and good politicians are attracted to the two main parties there they're more likely to win. The third party also doesn't attract voters because of the aforementioned…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Proportionality is a key factor in assessing the fairness of a voting system, if a parties number of votes is not equal or close to their number of seats in parliament then the voters’ are being misrepresented. AMS is a PR system, which results in a party’s percentage of votes being more in line with the number of seats they win in parliament. The list MSPs ‘top up’ the constituency MSPs to make the overall result within a region approximately in line with the wishes of the electorate. In the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections Labour received 3 ‘top up’ MSPs to better reflect its level of support across the North East region as it received 44,000 in the 2nd vote. This shows that AMS allows for good representation in Parliament for voters. However, FPTP does not allow this same proportionality in Parliament, and in turn less representation of the electorate’s views as a whole. FPTP produces a disproportionate result. The two main parties have concentrated support in certain areas so win constituencies and seats. Smaller parties such as the Green Party and UKIP, with less concentrated support than Labour and the Conservatives, lose out under FPTP. For example, in 2005 Labour received 36% of the vote but 55% of the seats. The Lib Dems only received 10% of the seats with 22% of the vote. This shows AMS is more responsive to the will of the people as the composition of parliament will more closely represent the wishes of the electorate as it has an element of proportionality unlike…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    And yet with all these negative aspects to it one has to wonder what election system is the best suited for America and the best successor to the Electoral College? In response, I propose that the Electoral College should not be reformed but completely gotten rid of and replaced with a direct election system, where basically the presidency is determined by a popular vote. This way, everybody’s vote counts equally and it is a much fairer and democratic way of electing our president. But before I outline all the problems with the Electoral College and why it needs to be replaced by the direct vote election system, it is necessary to have a brief…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fttp Pros And Cons

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When more responsibility is put into the hands of the voters. the political pressure caused by the FTTP system will be relieved. Enabling voters to feel that their vote counts, and that they are better represented in their government. This change would also affect how the electoral college works. By not associating a whole state with one political party, but by giving more accurate representation of the people. Should the united states adopt this proportional system support of national government will increase and produce a better voter turnout in…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another flaw to the first-past-the-post system is that voters can be misrepresented in the House of Commons. Population determines electoral districts; therefore, if a province has a larger population, it will have more Members of Parliament. Half of those sitting in the House of Commons will be from Quebec and Ontario, which house more than half of Canada’s population. This means that the House of Commons will have a very Eastern focus, and act in its best interest. British Columbia and the Prairie Provinces are very…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two main electoral systems to discuss, first is the AMS (Additional Member System) and second is FPTP (First-Past-The-Post System). In general, there has been a view that considers AMS as the greater choice as an electoral system. The first point is, AMS is more responsible to the will of the people due to its hybrid system. A proportion of seats in the legislative assembly are elected using FPTP while a small number of representatives—additional member—are elected in multi-member constituencies. For example, in the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections, 56 members of the Scottish Parliament (43%) and 20 members of the Welsh Assembly (33%) are elected in this way1.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One advantage of the Electoral System is that it favors states with smaller populations. Without the Electoral system smaller states would be ignored in presidential elections. But because of this system the voice of the smaller states and minority groups like farmers are being preserved. With the State of the Union Address the President sets the agenda for the Congress and the legislations, similarity the Electoral College sets the agenda for how a presidential candidates campaign must be arranged. Candidates tend to campaign more in states that are swing states, and this is an advantage for voters who are dubious. Undecided voters in swing states can use this as an opportunity to educate themselves on the various policies each candidate stand for. The Electoral College system helps promote a two party system which is beneficial to our nation. Due to the winner take all rule, third and fourth parties help deny a plurality to a candidate, but third parties do not have the hope of winning large numbers of electoral college votes. This system discourages third parties from running and promotes “a stable balance by accommodating varied interests and opinions.” A two party system not only reduces political dissension but also increases a country’s harmony but increasing compromise and consensus between the two parties. Another advantage of the Electoral College is that it gives states the absolute power to participate…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another problem with the election system is that each ballout is different. Each state controls it own ballout, and they are designed poorly. For national elections there should be one ballout to make voting easier on the voter, but America doesn't have that. Many people cannot vote because it is so hard for someone who has multiple jobs or is disable. Most of the times that you can vote are during the day which would be during work house. So those who work eight hours or more don’t have a chance to vote. They make absentee ballots, but many citizens do not use that option. This is a major flaw in the election process. One of the biggest flaws to the national election is that a most citizens can’t run…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First past the post is the electoral system in place in the UK. It works to the advantage of some parties, however it also hinders others greatly. It usually a quick process going from voting one day and the elected party being announced shortly after. This however was not the case in the 2010 election. However it is a system guilty of many wasted votes. It is a very evenly balanced system of pros and cons.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    But the method that the United States uses to elect its president violates this principle by making sure that some peoples votes count more than others. If the 538 Electoral College votes were split up equally among the population (309,000,000/ 538) then every votes would represent 574,000 people. But this is not what happens because the Electoral College only gives votes to states, not people. For example, there are 11.5 million people in Ohio so to be fair they should get 20 votes. But the Electoral College doesn’t give Ohio 20 votes. It gives them eighteen. Where did those other two votes go? Those votes go to states like Rhode Island. Rhode Island has 1.1 million people in it, so it should have about 2 votes, but instead it gets four. Why? According to the rules of the Electoral College, every state, no matter how many people live there, each get three votes to start with, then the votes are redistributed. Because of this, a lot of states that don’t have that many citizens, and should only have one or two votes, now have three or four. This makes votes in some states count more than others. For example, Alaska is a very small state but has 3 electoral votes, making the weight of their vote 2.5. North Carolina however, who gave up two of their votes to make sure one of the smaller states had at least three, has 15 Electoral College votes, making each vote weighted at 0.91 of a vote. A Vermonters vote, according…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important to consider the development of a new system of national elections and the issues that would result. Implementing the direct election would lead to “a host of defects that would make electoral misfires more likely and trigger a series of political and constitutional crises” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). This would be a source of instability moving forward as these changes would require changes to the current system and would need to have the agreements among several states in a subconstitutional or binding form or an amendment to the Constitution ratified by two thirds of the states. The new proposed system “risks creating a presidential election system that is neither workable nor fair” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). While it is argued that the direct election would promote fairness and representation, it would likely be the case that these factors would be reduced in this scenario. It is therefore essential to develop a coherent framework for implementing such a strategy. (Implementing direct…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, this notion distorts the one-man one vote principle, which characterizes many democracies across the world. A direct popular vote is a manifestation of true democracy and a fair electoral process but the Electoral College, which characterizes America’s presidential election process, takes this away. In Western counties such as France, when there is no clear winner of a presidential race, a runoff occurs to determine the person who the president becomes. The concepts of fairness, justice and democracy are important in the modern world are should neb manifested in terms of representation, choice, and political systems. The right to vote should upheld in a manner that gives every American citizen the responsibility and chance to vote knowing that his or her vote…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analyze criticism of the "Electoral College" system and the alleged advantages and disadvantages of various reform proposals.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays