Preview

Final Draft: Chemical Warfare

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
446 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Final Draft: Chemical Warfare
Chemical Warfare Final Draft

Do you think it's right to use chemical toxins to harm or kill people who are defending, or fighting for their lives? I don't and that is why I am aganist chemical warfare. There are other ways which can be used to defend your country without taking away the lives of many people in such a barbaric fashion. Chemical warfare takels many innocent lives even when they haven't done anything wrong! Chemical warfare is a way of torturing people with nerve, blister, and choking agents. It should be banned because there has been many attempts to ban it and soliders should not be allowed to make these poor people suffer.

Chemical warfare takes away many innocent peoples lives. How would you feel if you were killed and you didn't do anything wrong? This tortures people and causes them to get killed for no reason. It takes away peoples family members and many children are forced to live without a mom or a dad. Some familes can not make it without that stream of income so they are forced to live on the street or with other family. This would be a really bad way to grow up. Don't you think?
…show more content…
Nerve agents attack the nervous system of the human body. The effect of nerve agents are long lasting and cumulative. Blister agents cause severe skin, eye, and muscle pain and irritation. They cause chemical burn resulting in large painful water blisters. Choking agents stop a victims abiltiy to breath. They cause build upof fluids in the lungs which leads to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In her paper, War: An Invention- Not a Biological Necessity, Margaret Mead says that "…warfare, by which I mean organized conflict between two groups as groups, in which each group puts an army (even if the army is only fifteen Pygmies) in the field to fight and kill, if possible, some of the members of the army of the other group- that warfare of this sort is an invention like any other of the inventions in the terms of which we order our lives, such as writing, marriage, cooking our food instead of eating it raw, trial by jury, or burial of the dead, and so on." Mead backs up this statement by telling about the Eskimo people, who have no sense of warfare.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chloroform Civil War

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page

    The procedures of a civil war surgeon vary, depending on what side you're on (union or the confederacy), or what knowledge you know such as techniques or an unknown discovery. One technique is putting soldiers asleep when doing an amputation. The surgeons would use chloroform though after the amputation the soldiers would remember everything but would not feel a bit of pain. Later in the war the confederates started to run out of chloroform, a new technique would put one or two drops of chloroform into a sponge and inhale it through a funnel or a tube. Another discovery that was not found out at the time was the germ theory. Neither the union or confederacy knew about germs, going from operation to operation not washing their hands and sticking…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agent Orange

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Agent Orange is a chemical agent that was used in the Vietnam War between the years of 1962 and 1971. Without any knowledge of the damage that it can cause, it was spread across the southern part of Vietnam. Aerial Spray used by airplanes and helicopters was how the agent was spread throughout Vietnam. After the spread of the agent throughout the vegetation, there were some side effects that were unknown but later surfaced. This is how Agent Orange played a major role to the Vietnamese and also to the Soldiers. It caused a lot of side effects that not only affected the Vietnamese and their families but also the United States Soldiers that served during the war, and their families. It forced the United States to compensate those who were affected. They only compensated those who could prove they were exposed to the agent. Some of the Vietnamese and their families were compensated but Vietnam is still requesting more compensation from the United States.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of war brings up many questions about life and death, suffering, and consequences. While many people may see war as something that affects people as a whole, such as nations or a persecuted group, war further impacts every individual, whether or not they are directly involved. War limits freedoms and individualism, and in most cases people find themselves with less rights than during peacetime. People base their choices not on what they feel, and more on what they have to do to survive. Soldiers and civilians alike are influenced by war in different ways, however, these tie together when the overall effects of war are examined.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was it really a moral choice to use Agent Orange during the Vietnam Conflict? Agent Orange was a defoliant used during the Vietnam conflict. According to the U.S. Veteran Dispatch ,the herbicide was first called in to action in 1962 by the U.S. military. The powerful herbicide known as “Agent Orange” contained two main chemicals dioxin and TCDD 1, 4, 5. These chemicals were already potent by themselves but when combined they created one of the most powerful herbicides known to man. Agent Orange was only one of the many “Rainbow herbicides”. The different rainbow herbicides used in Vietnam were: Agent White, Agent Purple, Agent Blue, and the most lethal of them all Agent Orange. The nick names given to the different defoliants and herbicides were the cause of the barrels they were shipped in. For example Agent Orange was shipped in an orange striped barrel. The defoliant was…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anthrax Informative Speech

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine you are walking to work on a Monday. As you walk you see a light mist in front of you, thinking nothing of it, you walk into the fog. Within seconds of inhaling the mist you collapse to the ground shaking violently, unable to breathe. Within minutes you and countless people around you are dead. What just happened was a chemical weapon attack with the nerve gas VX, one of the many chemical weapons out there in military warehouses and labs. Biological warfare is the deadly sister to chemical warfare, it uses diseases such as botulism and anthrax to try to wipe out soldiers and civilians alike. Even with the horrible side effects, if the weapons are caught early enough they can be treated and major…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I hadn’t personally experienced how weapons, if fallen in the wrong hands, Hitler/ Bugabi /Bashar Al Assad/ ….. , can eradicate entire generations and civilizations I would not be so against it but an unforgettable image of demolition, annihilation and extermination is planted in my head.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is an undeniably complex subject and although most people know how they feel about the Vietnam War, it is rare for us to agree on exactly what was right and wrong. Despite this, we have the tendency to support facts, and the fact in this case is that Agent Orange had detrimental effects wherever it was spread. Agent Orange is a herbicide that was used by the United States Military during the Vietnam war, it is made up of equal parts 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Its purpose was to destroy forests and enemy crops during the war (Agent Orange, 2015). Although this substance was already considered an environmental hazard, it was later found that the manufacturing of Agent Orange resulted in a dioxin byproduct. When exposed to dioxins, humans experience…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Ancient Greek philosophy it is believed that all matter is made up of four elements: earth, water, air and fire. According to David Osborn, the Greeks believed that our world exists in a simple balance of these four elements. If the delicate harmony of these powerful forces were to be disturbed by human interference, there would be a vast amount of turmoil and chaos on Earth (webpage). Within the novel The Wars the author, Timothy Findley, utilizes the elements of earth, water, air and fire to demonstrate the destruction that the war has on not only humans, but on the natural environment. It is seen through the life of Robert Ross that these elements, that are essential for human survival, have been turned into forces of death and destruction.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States should not continue to develop and test weapons of mass destruction because it can kill millions,It's expensive and has lack of morals. On August 6, 1945 Harry S. Truman, had to make a world changing and tough decision. The United States dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb all over Japan,Hiroshima.The explosion destroyed 90% of the city and very quickly killed about 80,000 people and later on because of radiation exposure , 10,000 people died. The United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s harmful, costs a lot, and has flaws.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weapons of Destruction

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This Government, as promised, has maintained the closest surveillance of the Soviet military buildup on the island of Cuba. Within the past week, unmistakable evidence has established the fact that a series of offensive missile sites is now in preparation on that imprisoned island. The purpose of these bases can be none other than to provide a nuclear strike capability against the Western Hemisphere.…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Warfare In Trench Warfare

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Geneva protocol convened which called together 140 countries from all over the world, this meeting was called for the prohibition of the poisonous or other gases like mustard gas. When these 140 countries had signed this treaty then they could not use poisonous gases and it would not be used against them in war. Chemical warfare had to be banned because it had taken so many lives of the men and it also harmed the innocent who did not fight in the war, it was gas so it lingered and was easily dispersed. “The widespread use of gas in World War I, causing possibly 1.3 million casualties and 100,000 deaths engendered almost universal abhorrence for gas warfare.” The way in which people fight now has changed since technology has advanced a lot since 1917. The aircrafts have much improved and so instead of manning flying instruments armed forces now use drones to deliver the bullet and correctly identify the enemy so there is no mistaking for killing the wrong person and risking a soldier's life. Technology in every way has much improved, the medical equipment and medicines, and the use of bomb sniffer dogs have saved the lives of hundreds of soldiers. Now if a soldier is stuck with a bullet, or injured in anyway they can quickly be sent off in a medevac and be treated relatively quickly, and either be sent home safely or return to the battlefield. Infections no longer cause amputations or death, they too can be treated with advancing medicine. And the dogs who are trained to sniff out bombs can help to save lives, if there are hidden mines or bombs nearby, often times the dog can safely find and point it out without anyone getting injured, however if someone was going to be injured it would be the dog and not a…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is one example of when military force was warranted to ensure the wellbeing of civilians were being considered. Just days before that, the local government decided to use chemical weapons on their own people. In 1925, the Geneva Protocol created a regulation that prohibited the use of chemical weapons on warfare (n.d). Since this country decided to use it on their own people, the United States saw this as a violation and decided to use military force. The local population could not defend themselves so a larger government stepped in to ensure their well-being. This would be a good decision to intervene because the use of chemical weapons should be banned all together. With this situation there are several risks associated with the decision that was…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kurdish Genocide

    • 1708 Words
    • 5 Pages

    United Nation. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, (2013). Chemical weapons. Retrieved from website: http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Chemical/…

    • 1708 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is killing ever justified

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are lots of arguments to say when killing is justified as in the case of a war. In World War II the Nazi’s attempting to kill all the Jews in the world was definitely not justified, but on the other hand the Allies killing was justified because they were trying to keep the Germans from taking over the world and because of this we live in the world we live today.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays