Preview

Figurative Language In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Figurative Language In Julius Caesar
In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after the death of Julius Caesar. Through this speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and Brutus.
Throughout Marc Antony’s speech he uses irony to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and Brutus. For example, when Marc Antony states, “But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man (pg. 123).” This conveyed irony because Anthony was saying one thing, yet meant something different. Antony stated that Brutus said Caesar was ambitious and everyone has to believe him because he is honorable, but really Antony meant the complete opposite. The reader and the citizens of Rome were able to realize that Marc Antony is saying these things about Brutus but he obviously doesn't really believe them himself, yet more …show more content…
Antony uses figurative language when he says, “My heart is in the coffin there was Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me (pg. 123).” Antony uses this metaphor to portray to the citizens of Rome, the sadness and mourning that has impacted him personally due to the murder of Caesar. And because the Romans see and feel Antony’s sadness it will rub off on them and truly make them question the actions of Brutus and the conspirators. The use of this metaphor at the end of Antony’s speech illuminates the conflict between the Romans and Brutus.
In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after Brutus spoke out about killing Caesar with the conspirators. Through Marc Antony’s speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Caesar And Kev Carmondy's Song 'Julius Caesar'
    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Caesar And Kev Carmondy's Song 'Julius Caesar'

    In Shakespeare’s ’Julius Caesar,’ what characters say and think about each other, has a significant impact on the ways in which they themselves, are…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Rhetorical Analysis
    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Rhetorical Analysis

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Logos, Pathos, And Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Logos, Pathos, And Ethos In Julius Caesar

    In, Act III Shakespeare pits Mark Antony’s famous rhetorical speech, “Friends, Romans, and Countrymen” against Brutus’ “Romans, Countrymen, and Lovers”. The play is driven by Persuasion. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar must die, setting the…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar Essay
    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar Essay

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Speech Rhetorical Analysis
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    This reflect poorly on Brutus' character because it shows that he was fine with betraying someone who thought so highly of him. It makes him seem uncaring, a trait that someone in power should not have. This portrays Brutus as cold-hearted. By saying this, Antony is building up Caesar's character. He shows his compassion for the people, and how he sees himself no better as the people- when they are sad, it affects him too. The makes him seem like a good…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Shakespeare Use Figurative Language In Julius Caesar
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Does Shakespeare Use Figurative Language In Julius Caesar

    Shakespeare is widely regarded as one of the greatest English writers in history because of his use of figurative language writing skills. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses figurative language multiple times throughout the play. Shakespeare uses figurative language in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to create a special effect or feeling for the reader. Some examples of figurative language that Shakespeare uses throughout the play includes: verbal irony, personification and metaphors. By using figurative language in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare indirectly expresses his ideas to the readers.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antony's Speech In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    “Et tu Brute?” words came out Caesar’s mouth like a slap to the face. Brutus knew in his heart right then and there that things were going to go down hill. As soon as Antony heard what had happened at the capital, he knew that what he said in his speech would be to his advantage. The play written by early english playwright, William Shakespeare, is about the tragic death of Julius Caesar. It takes place in Rome, and tells the historical story of how Caesar was brutally murdered, and the terrible fate of the conspirators who killed him. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony presents a speech to the crowd, as well did Brutus. Antony, though, had the most effective speech, by using important literary techniques, such as pathos, ethos, and strategic word choice, William Shakespeare, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.”…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    English - conflicting perspectives
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    English - conflicting perspectives

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Mark Antony And Brutus Speeches
    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Mark Antony And Brutus Speeches

    In the Shakespeare play Julius Caesar after Caesar is murdered by Brutus and the other conspirators he and Mark Antony give speeches. Brutus’s speech is over the reasons that he and the others murdered Caesar. Mark Antony’s speech the surface telling the citizens of Rome to not go against Brutus but is actually designed to stir up the people of Rome so that they will go into rebellion against Brutus and that so Mark Antony can Rome. Both these speeches give a huge amount of insight into not only the characters of Brutus and Mark Antony but also goes into the central message of Julius Caesar. The outcome of both speeches is that the crowd of people gathered around to hear the speech sides with the speaker and since Brutus speaks first and Mark Antony speaks second the crowd ultimately sides with Mark Antony and rebel against Brutus and all of the other conspirators. The crowd is so stirred up that they beat an innocent poet just because his name was Cinna which was the name of one of the conspirators that killed Caesar.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Power Of Words In Julius Caesar
    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Power Of Words In Julius Caesar

    In the play “Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare, the power of words is displayed throughout the entire work. Speech plays a large role in the plot of “Julius Caesar”. Generally, when people try to get what they want or to persuade others; they use words. The fickle plebeians are swayed through Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brutus V. Antony: Compare the speeches made by Brutus and Antony after Caesar's death. Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare
    • 748 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus V. Antony: Compare the speeches made by Brutus and Antony after Caesar's death. Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

    Brutus and Antony are both portrayed as above average orators in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they both use this skill to achieve there preplanned goals in there speeches. Brutus's goal was to rationalize the assassination of Caesar and to convince the people that Brutus and his fellow conspirators were actually heroes for what they did. On the other hand Antony's goal was to turn the people of Rome against the conspirators and to more brightly illuminate the good things that Caesar did, and in doing so make the people want to seek revenge for there leaders death. Even though Brutus and Antony have separate and completely opposite goals they both use certain tactics to woo the crowd in there favor. They did this by appealing to the crowd, using irony, and by applying the principles of human behavior to the situation.…

    • 748 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics