Preview

Feudalistic Societies: Japan and Europe

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
540 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feudalistic Societies: Japan and Europe
A Feudal system is the legal and social system that evolved in Europe in the 8th and 9th centuries, in which vassals were protected and maintained by their lords. Although feudalism is totally considered a European creation, feudalism was invented by the Japanese at around the same time too. The two feudalistic societies shared practices and principles, but were also differed in many other main aspects.
European and Japanese feudalism were similar in various ways. In Europe people were in classes that were arranged in an order. Slaves were at the bottom, peasants, knights and other nobles being in the middle and the king or queen being at the very top. For Japan it was the same although there were different names, and one more class. Both feudalists in Japan and Europe hired warriors, either samurai or knights, to help protect a lord's lands. Both had landlords who protected the farmers and workers. Clearly in both places the power was based in class relationships. In European and Japanese Feudalism the most important virtue was loyalty, because all the system depended on personal loyalty.
Japanese and European feudalism also had differences. European feudalism was based on Roman legal structure, and the Japanese feudalism had its main structure using Chinese Confucian morality. "Problems with inheritance soon became an important weakness. When a lord was no longer able to enter into an agreement with his vassal, the contract among them was undetermined."(Anthony and Elisabeth Gaynor Ellis. World History: Connections to Today. Newark, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997. Print). The centralization of strong lordships evidently brought the localization of government down. Japan’s warriors had to follow the code of Bushido and in Europe knights had to follow the Code of Chivalry. The Japanese saw their Emperor as a God where in the Europe the people saw their kings and queens as if God gave them the right to rule but the rulers were not gods. Another difference is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both based on relationships between lords and vassals. In japan, lords are reffered to as shoguns and vassals were daimyo, military governors and stewards, Daimyos had their own vassals as well. This was the same in…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudal Japan Failure

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Feudal Japan was not a very successful civilization due to the choice of feudalism. Feudal Japan has succeeded, failed, and had a rather small evolution period. Japan had succeeded in ways of battle, environmental adaptations, literature, and other influences. Japan also failed greatly in governing. Japan had made good changes during and after the feudalist period especially the governmental changes. This feudalist period of Japan started in about 1185 starting with many changes and successes. The middle of the civilization showed the most failures overwhelming the successes. The ending of the civilization was the start of evolution. Therefore, Feudal Japan had small successes but was overall a failing civilization.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To compare the ranks they are very similar I.E the merchants in feudal japan were similar to those of the European one (Serfs/Peseants). Feudal Japanese and European societies were built on a system of hereditary classes. The nobles were at the top, followed by the warriors, with tenant farmers or serfs below them, there was very little social mobility. Between the classes.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself as a Samurai, you are in the middle of defeating the European knights who are covered in plated armor. You begin to worry but then, you win, these are the reasons why a Samurai is better than a knight. Feudalism in Europe and Japan were both very similar. They both has rulers, and they both had rulers who hired nobles, and they both had nobles who hired landowners, and they both had landowners who hired warriors to protect the slaves and their land. If samurai and knights were to have fought against each other the samurai would have won because, they had movable armor and it was easier for them to dodge anything that a knight would slowly lunge at them with. If a Samurai and knights battled the knights would have fallen because, their armor was very defective. A knight's armor wasn’t made for easy movement, this made it more difficult for them to fight, but overall they were well protected(Document B). Their armor did defend them but, a Knight’s armor could easily be penetrated by a soldier…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1450s, Japan was a place of turmoil and unrest. Angered by the high rents they had to pay, peasants began revolting against their lords. To quell this chaos, the lords began hiring samurai to put down the rebellions. Taking advantage of the situation, the samurai began making demands of these lords so that by the end of these revolts, most of the new daimyo were former samurai. With these new daimyo in power, they began to clash with one another. This infighting erupted into a civil war that eventually ended with no apparent victor. This became known as the “Era of Independent Lords”.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    European and Japanese feudalism were similar in that they had a similar political structure of a hereditary caste system. The Japanese classes were the shogun (similar to a king in Europe), who held all the power. Then the daimyo, who owned the land, (similar to the lords and nobles in Europe), divided their land to the lesser samurais (similar to the European knights), and the same to the peasants, artisans, farmers, and merchants (similar to the serfs in Europe). In both Europe and Japan, the hierarchy was held together as a land-for-loyalty exchange. Both Japanese and European feudalism was based on mutual obligation, but the Japanese problems of internal attacks led to them begin using a feudal system for military aspects, while the Europeans foreign invasions led to them begin using a feudal system to protect and economically grow.…

    • 566 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All in all, samurai and knights have more differences than they do similarities. This includes their armour, views on death, and of course their loyalty to their lords. Although they both had similar loyalty rules, the differences in how they served their lord and others…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai were a little higher up than Knights in the feudal social order. In the social order in feudal Japan if you were a Samurai you were a warrior who owed loyalty and military service to Dalmyos for land or regular payment. All of the Samurai plus their family made up about ten percent of Japans population. Now, Knights on the other hand were warriors who owed loyalty and military service to a lord for land. There were about twelve thousand Knights in England and Normany France in the twelfth century. (Documents A, B)…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Europe, women were responsible for certain activities and were also treated with respect, while in Japan, they were entirely serving men. The European women were expected to stay home and be trained in household chores, such as farming or sewing, and they didn’t have an option to chose who they want to marry. On the other hand, the Japanese women held a more equal status as Japanese men. For example, the Japanese women were allowed to inherit part of their family’s estate and some women even became Samurais. The use of a feudal system in Japan affected their women by becoming more equal, while in Europe, they were only valued for their work and what they did. Women enjoyed a higher role and status in Japan at the time, due to the feudal…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Europeans and the Japanese have many aspects of feudalism in common, but also many that differ. Their feudalisms are more differences than similarities. The differences include their cultural and political aspects. They have similarities in the social aspects.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Japan had an emperor, feudalism developed because the emperor united the clans. Before feudalism, Japan was inhabited by many different clans. Clans fought each other frequently. Lives were lived in fear of attack. People were unhappy before feudalism and they started fighting for land. Feudalism gave samurai land. Rich landowners gave land for labor and crops. Feudalism is the bond of loyalty between a lord and those to whom he has given land.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan and Europe during the middle ages had both been affected by agriculture, social classes, and lack of power from the king/emperor. However, there had been major differences such as the role of women, and the different beliefs for a warrior between Chivalry (knights) and the Bushido code (samurais).…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sixteenth century, Tokugawa Japan had a feudal system of domains that brought their political system together and set them apart from other countries. This system was based upon a supreme ruler, the Shogun, who was over several Daimyo. The Daimyo served as lords of land holders who reported to the Shogun. This system was a catalyst in the rapid progress and development of this country. The country’s natural landscape and their religious/political standing made them a calm and stable people. Peace and order as well as the centralized feudal system were strong elements in this culture’s success.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The societies and political structure during Renaissance Europe, Edo Japan and Aztecs all have their similarities and differences. In Edo Japan and Renaissance Europe, feudalism was the main structure of power; however in Renaissance Europe, a large emphasis was put on trading as well, but in Edo Japan no trade was allowed, as Japan was still in isolation. The Aztecs considered most of their workers as equals, but nobles were given an advantage in education becoming a warrior because they started much earlier in age. This is similar many Renaissance city states where nobles were treated better and were able to get better jobs with less work. In both the Aztec and Japanese culture, warriors (until the Mejia revolution) were highly valued both religiously and militarily. Aztecs and Italian Renaissance citizens both highly valued their gods, but they worshipped them in…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before underlining the differences in economic growth and treatment of labour between capitalism and the earlier feudal system, it is necessary to understand the meaning of capitalism and feudalism separately.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays