Feminist Argument Analysis
The first article was that of climate change affecting the poorest people and the poorest countries. This is explained by multiple correlation between per capita earning and the devastation of climate fluctuation. They are many politically charged viewpoints on this issue but we must have bipartisan actions to establish if we should or shouldn’t do anything to respond to it with the poorer countries blaming us for the misery. The second article is on feminist economics which is the economic impact of feminist ideals in economics and jus the study of how women affect economies but aren’t adequate reciprocated. These are both heavily left leaning argument on viewpoints and realist, right leaning conservative politicians may disqualifying both
…show more content…
If the US were to devote their resources to help everyone that is being damaged by climate change, then where does this leave us? Maybe they should use war and violence to survive and curb their population growth in light of climate change being so impactful on them. Domestically, realists know that the US is a country of climate change deniers and just wants to grow in order to sustain our growing population’s job market. They may also argue in a human nature sense claiming that the early bird gets the worm mentality; that being the first countries to industrialize and become rich can now pass the climatic urban onto the lesser countries. Liberals would argue that organizations that look to help out the poorest nations should also take climate change into account. This as causal correlation that is not menial. This something we can prevent with pooling of small amounts of resources before the fact rather than huge amounts after another calamity strikes that world’s poorest. We will soon see country ally and fight over climate change-affected resources such as water. It should be in our moral fiber using a liberal, domestic level of analysis to state that it is now our responsibility to help other live in this world of climate change we built. There is an identity perspective on this systemic problem also as many of the poorest nations feel share the same idea about the industrial west screwing them over in terms of carbon output per capita as laid out in the article. They could claim that the western and other growing industrial powers used massive amount of carbon to grow and become rich and now leave the poorer countries down and out unable to ever grow to be such a power with climate change as an
If the US were to devote their resources to help everyone that is being damaged by climate change, then where does this leave us? Maybe they should use war and violence to survive and curb their population growth in light of climate change being so impactful on them. Domestically, realists know that the US is a country of climate change deniers and just wants to grow in order to sustain our growing population’s job market. They may also argue in a human nature sense claiming that the early bird gets the worm mentality; that being the first countries to industrialize and become rich can now pass the climatic urban onto the lesser countries. Liberals would argue that organizations that look to help out the poorest nations should also take climate change into account. This as causal correlation that is not menial. This something we can prevent with pooling of small amounts of resources before the fact rather than huge amounts after another calamity strikes that world’s poorest. We will soon see country ally and fight over climate change-affected resources such as water. It should be in our moral fiber using a liberal, domestic level of analysis to state that it is now our responsibility to help other live in this world of climate change we built. There is an identity perspective on this systemic problem also as many of the poorest nations feel share the same idea about the industrial west screwing them over in terms of carbon output per capita as laid out in the article. They could claim that the western and other growing industrial powers used massive amount of carbon to grow and become rich and now leave the poorer countries down and out unable to ever grow to be such a power with climate change as an