Preview

Federalists and Democratic-Republicans as Permanent Political Parties

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1007 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans as Permanent Political Parties
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the U.S. with permanent political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. When the political parties were created, people they might believed weaken the unity of the U.S., but they checked and balanced each other out to make sure there would be no tyrannical party ruler. As the Federalists interpreted the Constitution loosely, mainly using the elastic clause, they were able to create and pass laws that were not directly stated in the Constitution, which the Democratic-Republicans would then argue as invalid. During the period from 1800 to 1824, both the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans stayed true to their traditional principles; however, both parties evolved and compromised their ideals during the endless conflict of the strengthening of the governments powers and adaptation to the never-ending disagreements political parties, according to what was needed at the time. Democratic-Republican ideals included interpreting the Constitution strictly and pushing westward for more land for an agrarian republic. The tenth amendment granted states rights to govern themselves if the powers were not given to the federal government by the Constitution or prohibited. This amendment played a big role in Democratic-Republicanism ideas, because they argued that every power not listed in the Constitution was given to the states, without consideration about the elastic clause. These main principles of interpreting the Constitution strictly were kept traditional even though different occurances called for changes. In Thomas Jefferson's letter to Gideon Granger, he argued that the Federalists were over-assuming powers that were not granted by the Constitution (Document A). The Democratic-Republicans did not accept the amending of the Constitution with the Federalist loose interpretation ideas in mind, and therefore is why these aspects were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two main political parties in early America, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, fought many ideological and political battles from 1790 to 1810. Conflicts between these two parties grew out of their opposing ideologies the Democratic-Republicans supported states rights and a strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, whereas the Federalists favored a strong central government and a broader interpretation of the Constitution. However there are more than 3 major topics that I could talk about involving the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans between the years 1789 and 1812. Some of the topics are boring and some of the topics are pretty interesting.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties can be traced back to the early 1790s. Initially, the Federalists, or broad constructionists, favored the growth of federal power and a strong central government. The Federalists promulgated a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which meant that they believed that the government could do anything by the implied powers of the Constitution or that congress had the right to interpret the Constitution based on connotation. On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans favored the protection of states’ rights and the strict containment of federal power. The Democratic-Republicans were strict constructionists and they believed only in the enumerated powers of the Constitution. Up until 1800, these descriptions of the two political parties were very accurate. However during the period of 1801-1817, the Jefferson and Madison’s presidencies reveal that these characterizations were accurate only to a certain extent. These characterizations became inaccurate when Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe stepped up in power as president and were forced to compromise their political views for the benefit of the country in the face of war, economic pressure, and threats to the Union.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist party was an American political party from 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republican party was founded in 1792 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans viewed society differently. Being they viewed society in a way to help people individually or help them as a whole. Both political groups viewed many key issues differently that played a role in 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republicans and Federalist were facing economic issues, government power and foreign affairs. However, the Democratic-Republicans’ idea was more agreeable than the Federalists being they believed in a more prosperous republic by helping those in need than helping one group of people. People living during those times did not like the living…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1800 Jefferson entered office with the intention to move away from the Federalist policies of Washington and Adams and to put the nation onto a path that he thought would be best. He wished to minimize the power of the central government by strengthening the state governments. “Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government…” (Document A). Jefferson and the Republican Party envisioned a government that was going to work for the people, a government with the people’s interests at heart. They believed that having stronger state governments would accomplish this. The leaders of a state were closer to the people they were governing; therefore they should know what the public needed. Document B refers to Jefferson’s belief in the strict interpretation of the Constitution, especially when it is about the freedom of religion. “Certainly no power to prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume authority in religious discipline, has been delegated to the general [federal] government. It must then rest with the states, as far as it can be in any human authority…” It is clear that Jefferson believes that the…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 1790's became known as the Federalist Era because a Federalist President led it. Political parties began to form around two leaders, Hamilton and Jefferson. The Federalist Party supported Hamilton and his financial program. The opposing party that was known as the Democratic-Republican Party supported Jefferson and tried to elect candidates in different states who opposed Hamilton's program. The French Revolution later hardened the formation of these two parties. Americans became sharply divided over whether it should or should not support France.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This means that they think that the Constitution should be interpreted much more strictly with less federal government. They knew the federal government needed power, but they believed that people should have more say. “They accepted the idea of implied powers, but in a much more limited sense.” The Democratic-Republicans thought the implied powers would apply less to the federal and more to the state government. Although the federal government had certain implied powers, the Democratic-Republicans believed most powers not directly given to the federal government should belong to the people. “They believed that implied powers are those powers that are ‘absolutely necessary.’” In this quote they are referring to the elastic clause, or the part in the Constitution that can be interpreted in many ways. The Democratic-Republicans belief in the elastic clause is the way it was originally intended; only to use federal force if “absolutely necessary.” As you can see both parties had very different interpretations of the…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first political party system includes the Federalists v. Democratic Republicans. The Federalists, led by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong national government. They wanted to create a Constitution. They argued that government power should be used to promote economic development through a national bank. Democratic-Republicans, were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. They supported a weaker national government. They feared that federal involvement in the economy would benefit only a few wealthy northeasterners, and they thought that agriculture should still be the country's economic source. The second party system which included the Democrats v. Whigs differs from the first political party. Whigs, led by…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1998 Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although Republicans and Federalists were characterized as having particular views towards the implementation of the Constitution, the Jefferson and Madison presidencies prove that even though virtually they believe one thing, realistically they could very possibly act another way.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As new problems arose facing the new nation, many different views toward the new conflicts developed. Initially, Hamilton acted aggressively to deal with the new republic's financial troubles with proposals to fund the national debt, create a central banking system and uniform currency, and promote manufacturing with a high protective tariff. Jefferson opposed these policies, objecting to the concentration of power in the hands of bankers and currency speculators. Jefferson believed that an economy dominated by small farmers, not manufacturers, would best preserve republican values. Hamilton believed in a strong central government while Jefferson believed in States’ Rights. Hamilton believed, “United States becoming a commercial and industrial empire, a world power remarkable for its ability to balance individual freedom with government power” (Tindall). Jefferson believed that an agriculture based society would better protect the civil liberties of the Americans. He feared that the growth of cities would enrich the aristocracy and widen divisions between the rich and poor, just as it has today.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Party

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Seldom in the nation's history has there been a period so extraordinary in accomplishment as the first decade under the Constitution...."<br><br>This paper is going to be a step by step evaluation of arguably the most important decade in American History. The time period covered in this paper is 1789-1801. These are the years in which the Federalists had the most influence in the new government. They accomplished an amazing amount in these 12 years. <br><br>The Federalist Party was one of the first political organizations in the United States. The members of this party supported a strong central government, a large peacetime army and navy, and a stable financial system.<br><br>Although the first president, George Washington, was not a Federalist, his Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, was the developer and leader of the Federalist party. Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution so that the central government could become more powerful. Also Hamilton, along with the other party members, believed that commerce and manufacturing were more important than agriculture. <br><br><b>Financial Dilemma</b><br>During the first two years of the new federal government the biggest problem was that of raising money. At first the Congress adopted a small tariff on imports. This was a start but not nearly enough. The government needed this money to maintain its own existence and to be able to pay of the debt. The existence of the government was a necessity, but there was a lot of discussion as to whether the debt should be paid…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Washington’s Farewell Address was written to the people of the United States at the end of his second term as President. He wrote this as a result of his experiences, what he noticed, and saw while in his term. And he wanted to help out the next president that was coming into office. There was 6 themes that was part of the Farewell Address: extolls the benefits of the federal government, warns against the party system, stresses the importance of religion and morality, on stable public credit, warns against permanent foreign alliances, and on an over-powerful military establishment. Two themes that I’ll compare with today’s society is warns against the party system, and warns against permanent foreign alliances.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays