Preview

Fayol and Mintzberg

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
892 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fayol and Mintzberg
Fayol and Mintzberg

The aim of this project is to highlight what management is all about. Management is a vague term which many theorists have different interpretation. It has become an important part of our society and also in our daily activities. Based on my research, management is the process of getting activities completed efficiently and effectively with and through people. In this essay, I will be comparing and contrasting the views of management with two profound theorists, Fayol and Mintzberg. But before I do so I would like to give you a historical background on these theorists and also the approach each theorist takes to describe on their theory. However, these two theorists are like two sides of a coin. The objective of this essay is to show the similarities and differences between Fayol’s and Mintzberg’s views of management in order to enrich the reader’s knowledge in advance.
Henri Fayol (1841 – 1925) was the first father of management and was a managing director for a French mining company. He was seen as a critical contributor to classical school of management theory. His French management theorist believed that management is an acquired skill that can be taught where human skills is apply to system, not systems apply to people. He describes management as functions based on his personal observation and experience in the work force, while Henry Mintzberg has different opinion.
Henry Mintzberg is an internationally renowned academic and author on business and management with over 140 articles and thirteen books written. He believes that management is things that manager encounter on the job. That’s how he came up with the roles of management.
Fayol has five functions of management; planning, commanding, coordinating and controlling. These functions are to predict the future, plan for the future, developing different technique structure, managing activities, send information to staff members and make sure that things go according to what plan and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on Management: inside our strange world of organisations. Chicago: Free Press…

    • 5138 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol vs. Mintzberg

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henri Fayol (born 1841) who is a classical management theorist, and published (in 1916) his ideas of a management style that seems to categorise labour as capital, and sets out distinct titles of activities and roles that a manager should follow. Fayol’s theory has, supposedly, been heavily opposed by Henry Mintzberg’s (born 1939) differing views on management, portraying managers as critical strategic players (Brooks, 2009) and investigating what people are motivated by other than money, he also developed his theories upon Fayols.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mintzberg, H. (1989). “Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations”. New York: Free Press Publishing…

    • 2474 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgmt 301 Study Guide

    • 4560 Words
    • 19 Pages

    1. Planning- process of determining the organizations desired future goal and position and deciding how to get there.…

    • 4560 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Critical Management Study

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This essay will argue that it is important to study management and organisations in a critical, questioning way for two reasons. First, it is important to do so due to the influence and reach of management in large commercial organisations that covers a lot of aspects in the society, economy and culture. Second, by taking a critical approach to management, there is a possible gain of knowledge and understanding of management and what it is which leads to a better and more effective manager in order to be in a position to secure positive results and prevent undesirable outcomes occurring. In Section One, it will demonstrate the first point with reference to evidences and arguments from (Morgan 2006) and (Bakan 2004) to outline how these pieces of writing consider the significant risks that these organisations pose and warn us not to be subjective and limited to the dominance of the organisational practices and managerial. In Section Two, (Mintzberg’s 1971) Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation will be used to argue that the unrelenting pace, great variety, fragmentation and brevity of managerial work described by Mintzberg, and the high levels of anxiety and confusion documented by (Linstead, Fulop and Lilley 2009), can easily show that managers are unable to find the means necessary such as time or space to be certain that the organisation they are representing is on its way to create benefits to the society instead of harming it. Throughout the essay, these points would imply that we should study management in a critical and questioning way. Touching upon (Watson 2006) and (Linstead, Fulop and Lilley 2009), in its final section of the essay, it will elaborate on what a critical and questioning approach really means and how studying management critically is not the same as being negative, it is instead a commitment to be a benefit to society and be an effective manager in an organisation (Clegg, Kornberger, Carter and Rhodes 2006) based on an…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol's theory proposes that management consists of planning, commanding, coordinating, controlling and organizing. He states that power relationships are formed within this structure and led by a reward system offered by management. Attitudes within the organization are guided by how the management uses their authority to dictate the rewards. This is a basic approach use by management, however as the world change and expands on a bigger ground, Henri Fayol’s proposal has become a much of a challenge for the concept is basically base on the top management and that a certain organization’s success depends solely on the performance of the manager. Henri Fayol’s approach is base on a one direction organization which doesn’t take new roads; in my own opinion this approach will gradually be stagnant.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fayol believed by focusing on managerial practices he could minimize misunderstandings and increase efficiency in organizations.[1] He enlightened managers on how to accomplish their managerial duties, and the practices in which they should engage. In his book General and Industrial Management (published in French in 1916, then published in English in 1949), Fayol outlined his theory of general management, which he believed could be applied to the…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management Reflection

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fayol is also famous for the classical ‘school of management’ in which command and control is emphasized and published in “General and Industrial management” which is still highly referred to a century later. Fayol taught that management was comprised of five major components: Planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry Mintzberg

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Despite a series of highly important and influential books and appointments at two of the world 's leading business schools (McGill in Canada and INSEAD in France) Henry Mintzberg remains something of an outsider in the world of management thinking.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henri Fayol was one of the first theorists to define functions of management in his 1916 book “Administration Industrielle et Generale”. Henri Fayol identified 5 functions of management, which he labelled: planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Henri Fayol theorized that these functions were universal, and that every manager performed these functions in their daily work.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in order to appreciate and probe the management and its ensuing problems and the man.agerial roles and events, ete. Some years ago, an author who attempted to classify the various "schools" of management theory called this situation "the management theory jungle" [1]. Certainly, it could be observed that many different approaches were diversely categorised by different authors. Familiarity with the approaches to management analysis can help one appreciate many insights, ideas and help one avoid re-examining previously known ideas. Figure 1 summarises the various approaches to management analysis in the foUowing categories [2]. As seen in Figure 1, one of these approaches is Managerial Roles Approach that will be strived to explain in the following section. 2. TIIE MANAGERIAI.. ROLES APPROACH The Managerial Roles Approach which is one of the newer approaches to management analysis has been popularised by Henry Mintzberg. Mintzberg has given this approach higher visibility although many researchers have studied the actual work of managers. This approach is related to the Work-Activity SchooL. The Work-Activity School of management deals with the actual activities of managers which are analysed systematicaUy and conclusions are drawn only…

    • 2694 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Through the years, Fayol began to develop what he considered to be the 14 most important principles of management and define the six functions of management. Essentially, these explained how managers should organize and interact with staff.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fayol believed that management had five principle roles: to forecast and plan, to organize, to command, to co-ordinate and to control. Forecasting and planning was the act of anticipating the future and acting accordingly. Organization was the development of the institution's resources, both material and human. Commanding was keeping the institution’s actions and processes running. Co-ordination was the alignment and harmonization of the groups’ efforts. Finally, control meant that the above activities were performed in accordance with appropriate rules and procedures.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    nothing

    • 8944 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Henry Mintzberg is the Bronfman Professor of Management at McGill University. His latest book is Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange…

    • 8944 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics