Preview

Famine, Affluence, Morality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1156 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Famine, Affluence, Morality
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Derick Kaslon
PHI 200
Prof. Patricia Addesso
February 25, 2013

Based on the article by Peter Singer entitled Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he attempts to move us to do more for charities and gives one astounding example. He uses starving children in Bengali and a drowning child.
He argues that people have many different reasons to [delete] why they do not donate. His vision is that the people and the government should take care of the problem. He uses a great illustrative imaginative scenario. Basically, let’s say you are walking down the path by the local pond. You have just purchased a brand new pair of running pants worth $100. You see a young child drowning and screaming for help. You have a moral obligation to save that childs[‘s] life and you will sacrifice your brand new pants without question. The child’s life is worth more than your new pair of pants and you do not hesitate to ruin them for the child. Singer says it best, “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything else morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it.” (Singer, 1972) He is basically saying that if by saving that child you do not sacrifice anything, in this case the rescuer’s life, of equal moral importance you should do it.
This is where it gets interesting. He presents the idea that by the same token if you could give up the value of the clothes you were wearing to save that child’s life, you should be willing to donate that same value to a child who needs that as well. In his article he uses the Bengali children as an example. Singer states, “For the principle takes, firstly, no account of proximity or distance. It makes no moral difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor 's child ten yards from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away.” (Singer, 1972). For Singer to say that, he is stating that no matter if you know the child or if



References: Peterson, M. (2004). Foreign Aid and the Moral Value of Freedom. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7(3), 293-307. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504317 Singer, P. (1972). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229-243. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265052

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his ground-breaking essay on the effects of wealth and poverty on global society, Peter Singer juxtaposes the responsibility of the wealthy toward the less fortunate. Singer starts off by giving contrasting examples to the abject and severe poverty of third world countries and examples of the richer nations of the world. It is Singer’s assumption that the richer nations have a duty to help the poorer nations to develop into self sufficient societies. Singer goes on toe assert, that with the right assistance and the right guidance that even those on the lower levels of the economic totem pole can rise out of poverty. The gap between rich and poor is seen on an everyday basis on a local level, but becomes more pronounced as the richer nations are compared to the poorer ones. One of the prime examples of how the more advanced nations tend to have different values that the poorer ones is how the British government spent millions of dollars on developing supersonic transport but spent very little to assist third world countries in feeding refugees and the victims of natural disasters.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence and Morality” Peter Singer gives a seemingly devastating critique of our ordinary ways of thinking about famine relief, charity, and morality in general. In spite of that very few people have accepted, or at any rate acted on, the conclusions he reaches. In light of these facts one might say of Singer’s arguments, as Hume said of Berkeley’s arguments for immaterialism, that “… they admit of no answer and produce no conviction.”[1] While I do think that Singer’s considerations show that people should do considerably more than most people actually do, they do not establish his conclusions in their full strength or generality. So his arguments admit of a partial answer, and once properly qualified may produce some conviction.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most important issues facing the world today is the issue of the poor. There are many things that can be done about this issue, however much of the world is torn between wanting to help and not knowing how to go about it. This is the issue that is presented in the two essays - Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor,” and Peter Singer’s “What Should A Billionaire Give-and What Should You?” Garrett Hardin was an ecologist who warned of the dangers of overpopulation. In his article, he argues that our first obligation is to ourselves and our posterity and that we would be foolish to let rich nations share their surplus with poor nations. He believes that in a world with a growing population such sharing would do no good, “it would only overload the environment and lead to demands for still greater assistance in the future” (Hardin, Pg. 80). On the other hand, Peter Singer takes the view that people in affluent countries ought to stop spending their money on luxuries and begin giving that money to aid the world’s poor. He believes that all lives have equal value no matter where they are being led, and that we are very far from acting in accordance with that belief. Both Hardin and Singer have Utilitarian views on this subject pointing out the consequences for society. While Singer makes many good points throughout his article, at the end of the day I believe that Hardin provides a better analysis of the situation. Hardin’s point is the more persuasive and the stronger of the two articles, due to his many real world examples and his vivid lifeboat metaphor.…

    • 3390 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book and short article The Life You Can Save is almost all uncontroversial, yet, while Singer’s ability at glorifying ones self is marvelously hitched to well worthy causes. But certainly his objective of the book was not to make others feel guilty, rather, to get individuals to donate and give more than usual, also being if it is not as much as they can. And unlike come areas of the government, Singer does not believe in supporting a local…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work called “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” Peter Singer raises the theme of morality in the modern fast-changing world by addressing socio-economic problems of East Bengal. According to Singer’s main argument, there is no justification to richer nations for not helping the countries such as Bangladesh.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer explores human moralities while expressing his concern towards the little consideration given by the wealthier regions regarding the problem that people are starving in less fortunate places. Although many people have the ability to give enough to aid in minimizing this problem, they have chosen to not involve themselves at all. Very few countries such as Britain and Australia have active governments that put aside money to help these refugees. Unfortunately, the amount of money they put aside for trivial projects is plentiful in comparison to the smaller amounts provided for the hungry refugees. Singer uses the situation taking place in Bengal as an example for its severity and recentness. He expresses concern for the unjustified…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Outlook on Peter Singer

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his Peter Singer’s article, “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he speaks of how he looks at ways one might think about charity and famine relief. Not everyone has accepted his general idea of how a person should act in these situations. I myself only agree with his views at a certain level. I believe that everyone should help others out in a disaster if they have the means available to do so. Singer’s main argument is the lack of food, shelter, and medicine is horrible and that we have the means to prevent it without sacrificing very much. He uses the Bengal Emergency for his example to his argument. He state “that the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation like that in Bengal cannot be justified; indeed, the whole way we look at moral issues – our moral conceptual scheme – needs to be altered, and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society” (Singer, 1972). His goal here is to persuade people that everyone, including the government, need to help with famine relief, and how we deal with such disasters now is “morally unjustified”. (Singer, 1972)…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "A Theory of Justice"

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Singer’s ideal society seems to be modified from pure utilitarianism due to his belief that one should give as much as they can to eliminate suffering "without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance." I feel that “comparable moral importance” is a blurry statement. Singer seems to believe that one should give as much as possible to everyone, no matter how far away, just until one is above poor, that they only have what one needs to live and eat. The veil…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Singer, P. Philosophy and Public Affairs. Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Vol 1. No 3. (Spring, 1972). pp229-243. Published by: Princetin University Press.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who Is Wrong or Right

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many things to Singer’s is trying to say in his article famine, affluence, and Morality, but it all comes down to the fact in what you believe is right and wrong and what is good and evil in one person life. Are you the type of person that who only helps friends and family or are you the type of person that would go out of your way to help any one that needs help?…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are many ethical issues that are talked about within Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” for philosophy and public affairs. He talks about the people that are dying from lack of food, shelter and lack of medical care in East Bengal and what the people around the world can do to prevent this from happening, how we are morally obligated to help those less fortunate, what marginal utility is, and also how charity relates to the people that he is trying to help.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Singer anticipates objections and the first of which is that as the drowning child is nearer to us than the starving Bengali, the moral obligation is therefore seemingly reduced. Singer responds that this merely affects the likelihood of who receives aid first, but it still holds that we should be indiscriminate with the amount of help given to people especially when the world is becoming a "global village" (405). Singer also anticipates the objection that there are other people who are standing around not doing anything anyway. He contends that there is a psychological difference but the moral implications are still the same as it is absurd to be less obliged to help the drowning child even if there were many others idling…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer Essay Example

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Famine, Affluence, and Morality “is an essay written by Peter Singer in 1971 and published in Philosophy and Public Affairs in 1972. It argues that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate far more resources to humanitarian causes than is considered normal in Western cultures. The essay was inspired by the starvation of Bangladesh Liberation War refugees, and uses their situation as an example, although Singer's argument is general in scope. The essay is anthologized widely as an example of Western ethical thinking” (wikipedia.org 2013).…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elaborating, Singer points out that distance is not morally relevant, especially with modern methods of aid. We can easily send a small amount of money to a foreign country, and that money will save the live or lives of children. If we don't do so, those children will die. However, Singer goes further with his example as he points out that when it comes to additional income, there is always one more child to save, and the reasoning still…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics