Preview

Faith in Science

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Faith in Science
Faith in Science
With increasing scientific breakthrough due to better technology, the understanding of the origin of life seems to be on the verge of scientific fact rather than theory. Because of this, well-educated scientists seem to think that those who hold on to religious beliefs are un-educated or just set in their ways, unwilling to see the truth before them. It may seem to many in the scientific community that a belief in God is not only inappropriate, but unwelcome. But because scientists agree that scientific fact is always up for debate, there is always room for God in science.
In order to have room for God in science, it is important to understand the background behind religion. Documented history tells us polytheism is where religion began. The belief of multiple Gods was all that existed until Christianity began in ancient Rome with Jesus Christ (from 4 B.C.E.-30 C.E.) Jesus taught that “Gods true kingdom was to be found not on earth but in heaven.” (Hunt, Lynn, Martin, Rosenwein, & Smith 191) The ultimate crucifixion and martyrdom of Jesus was the solidification of Christianity. Constantine further entrenched Christianity when he had a dream about Jesus’ cross on the sun, (his current God at the time was the sun God) which he interpreted as: with Jesus you will be victorious. Constantine killed opposition in Jesus name, and being victorious, furthered that Jesus was on his side and Christianity began to flourish. Scientific history although more recent, is best known by its contributions by specific scientists. Newton’s “Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica” (The mathematical principles of natural philosophy), appeared in 1687. His three “laws of motion” soon became the basis of all future work in physics. (Ayala 321) Carl Linnaeus was a Swedish botanist in the mid 1700’s who developed the Linnaean Taxonomy which divides and categorizes plant and animals into subgroups; “Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, and Species.”



Cited: "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism." Scientists that denounce Darwinism. www.dissentfromdarwin.org, Dec. 2011. Web. 26 Oct. 2012. <http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=660>. Armenta, Tony, and Kenneth E. Lane. "Tennessee To Texas: Tracing The Evolution Controversy In Public Education." Clearing House83.3 (2010): 76-79. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Sept. 2012. AYALA, FRANCISCO J. "Where Is Darwin 200 Years Later?." Journal Of Genetics 87.4 (2008): 321-325. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Sept. 2012. Carroll, Sean B. "The Big Picture." Nature 409.6821 (2001): 669. Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. Collins, Allen G. "Geologic time scale." http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/help/timeform.php. International Commission on Stratigraphy, 26 Nov. 1994. Web. 12 Oct. 2012. Galas, David J., Carl T. Bergstrom, Vicki L. Chandler,, Carlos Martínez Del Rio, and Paul G. Falkowski. The Role of Theory in Advancing 21st Century Biology: Catalyzing Transformative Research. N.p.: The National Academy of Sciences, 2007. N. pag. Print. Giberson, Karl. "Guest Editorial: Say It Ain 't So: America 's Continued Rejection Of Evolution." Applied Developmental Science 10.3 (2006): 116-120. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Sept. 2012. Hunt, lynn, Thomas R. Martin, Barbara H. Rosenwein, and Bonnie G. Smith. The Making of the West. Fourth ed. Vol. 1. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2012. 190-227. Print. Mangel, Marc. "New Views On Religion And Science." Bioscience 57.3 (2007): 273-277. Vocational and Career Collection. Web. 12 Oct. 2012. "Primordial Soup Or Vinaigrette: Did The RNA World Evolve At Acidic Ph?." Biology Direct 7.1 (2012): 4-15. Academic Search Complete. Web. 10 Oct. 2012. Ruse, Michael. "Flawed Intelligence, Flawed Design." Virginia Quarterly Review 82.2 (2006): 54-77. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Sept. 2012. The Holy Bible: King James Version. Dallas, TX: Brown Books Publishing, 2004. Unlocking the Mystery of Life. Perf. Michael J. Behe. Illustra Media, 2002. Web. 12 Oct. 2012. <http://www.allaboutscience.org/darwins-theory-of-evolution-video.htm>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Lawrence and Lee 77). This degenerate reaction shows how both sides of the argument are ignorant of another because they both believe wholeheartedly that one is correct and the other is wrong. This divide, while Drummond is meant to represent Evolutionist views and progress, is still deepened by Hornbeck’s despicable poignant…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “One Side Can Be Wrong,” Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne argue that teaching creationism along side evolution does not make sense, and that creationism has no business being in the science classes. Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne are evolutionary biologists at Oxford University and the University of Chicago. They published this essay in the Guardian in September 2005, seeking to appeal to middle-aged parents. They argue that creationism cannot provide any positive evidence to create a controversy and therefore should not be taught in schools to children and teenagers. On the other hand, there is a substantial amount of evidence for evolution where debate and conversation can arise.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kitcher, Philip. Living with Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith. OUP USA, 2007. Web. 12 March 2013.…

    • 2649 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Entwistle

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Entwistle also explained how theology and psychology are integrated. “The interaction of psychology and theology is virtually inevitable due to their mutual interest in understanding the ambiguities and mysteries of human behavior, and healing human brokenness.” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 51). This statement then leads the book into the historical background of theology and science.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does faith have a legitimate link to science and the methods by which we gain knowledge and understanding? Some would be quick to reply that just as our government has placed a dividing line between churches and state that science and the Bible do not mix. But from a Christian perspective how can we say the same when we understand the foundation of all truth comes from God. In Colossians 1:16 in the Amplified Bible it reads: “For it was in Him that all things were created, in heaven and on earth, things seen and things unseen, whether thrones, dominions, rulers, or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [by His service, intervention] and in and for Him” (Bible Gateway, 2012). In Revelations 4:11 it reads, “Worthy are You, our Lord and God, to receive the glory and the honor and dominion, for You created all things; by Your will they were [brought into being] and were created” (2012). If God is the created of all things, and science its methods and how we obtain knowledge and learn are a function of God’s work in us, how can we say the two are separate entities unto themselves. Really we cannot. This Paper will examine these very facts and methods as they pertain to man and God and what the correlation is between Science, faith, man and God.…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Darwin, Charles. "The Origin of Species." The Online Literature Library. Knowledge Matters Ltd., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is an awesome book. It describes the outlook of biology not only through the eyes of faith, but from a Christian theistic point of view. In Biology through the Eyes of Faith, it explains the difference between a scientist’s perception of nature oppose to a Christian’s perception. Scientists say the world evolved which conflicts with the theistic view, which says the world came about through the creator God.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It could be argued by the Western world, that science is our God. Due to the vast progression in science, man has been able to make amazing discoveries and accomplishments, such as putting roving robots on mars, creating machines that can go faster than the speed of sound and creating a thirty inch television that can be rolled up and be put in a paper towel tube for our convenience. While scientific discoveries and accomplishments are usually amazing, beneficial and bring further understanding of the world around us, there is a real danger of replacing God with science, such as those who hold the belief of scientific naturalism. Those who uphold scientific naturalism believe that “nothing exists except the material, there are no nonphysical entities such as God or souls”, as they shut out God completely and try to impose their beliefs on the world around them (Wilkens & Sanford, 2009, p. 101).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Griffin, David Ray, Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.…

    • 2863 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion and science both serve different purposes in the world, however their purpose produce the same goal depending on what one believes in. Christians believe that the world was created by God in seven days while scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory. Jane Goodall, known for her study of chimpanzees, expresses her belief that oneness with nature is best achieved through first hand observation in her essay, “In the Forest of Gombe.” On the other hand, Barbara Kingsolver views science, especially Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection, as the only answer to understanding the environment. In her essay, “A Fist in the Eye of God,” Kingsolver examines the concept of genetic engineering and presents the reader with the dangers of this scientific concept. Goodall and Kingsolver both discuss nature, evolution, science and religion. Although they have different views about how nature came about, they both believe that the natural world should be left alone. For Goodall a connection exists between science and religion yet Kingsolver feels that the theory of evolution should be taught to children instead of religion.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: 1. Gross, David. "In Ga., it 's evolution by any other name." The Philadelphia Inquirer: Page A10, January 31, 2004.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    epigenetics

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Wright, R. T. (2003) biology through the eyes of faith, Harper Collins San Fransisco 10:194…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edis, Taner and Young, Matt ed. Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the new Creationism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2005.…

    • 2712 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Science vs Religion

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The relationship between religion and science has been a subject of study since Classical antiquity, addressed by philosophers, theologians, scientists, and other commentators. Perspectives from different geographical regions, cultures and historical epochs are diverse. Recent commentators have characterized the relationship as one of 4 categories: conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration. Discussions of what is science and what is not science, the demarcation problem in the philosophy of science, have intersected with discourse on religion in some instances and both have had complex relations in their historical interactions.…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science actually confirms "God" or outside interference, when carefully and honestly studied, analyzed, and accepted. Certainly it's easy to dispute the existence of God, or creator (whatever) by science at today's level. But there is a problem with science, the rules have been changing, not to mention mankind can only view at best 70 billion light years into the cosmos, which is infinite by all accounts that we know about. So it would be safe to say, science has no facts beyond that 70 billion light year range. That range beings an unmeasurable fraction of what existence may really turn out to show. It seems that much of the denial of a creator comes from the fear there may be a creator as easily as there may not .Which side do people choose to accept. Just…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays