Preview

Fair Use

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
31256 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fair Use
TUSHNET_POST_FLIP2.DOC

12/1/2004 6:05:00 PM

Essay

Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free Speech and How Copying Serves It
Rebecca Tushnet†

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 537 I. OVERVIEW: THE FIRST AMENDMENT, COPYRIGHT, AND THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THEM ................................................................ 538 A. What Free Speech Is For ............................................................. 538 B. Copyright and Fair Use ............................................................... 540 C. The First Amendment Value of Copying ...................................... 545

II. LIMITING THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY INVOKING FAIR USE .............. 547 A. How the First Amendment Value of Dissent Maps onto Transformative Fair Use.............................................................. 549 B. How the Identification of Transformative Use with the First Amendment Obscures Other Free Speech Values........................ 553
† Assistant Professor, NYU School of Law; Visiting Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center, 2004-2005. Thanks to participants in the NYU Brown Bag Lunch series, the Brooklyn Law School Faculty Workshop, the Georgetown Advanced Constitutional Law Seminar, the Virginia Intellectual Property Colloquium, Amy Adler, Jack Balkin, Rachel Barkow, Lillian BeVier, Julie Cohen, Francesca Coppa, Jeffrey Cunard, Rochelle Dreyfuss, Harry First, Laura Heymann, Larry Kramer, Larry Lessig, Neil Netanel, Richard Primus, Kermit Roosevelt, Zach Schrag, Eugene Volokh, Tim Wu, and Diane Zimmerman for comments. As always, special thanks to Mark Tushnet, for just the right amount of advice.

535

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1793181

TUSHNET_POST_FLIP2.DOC

12/1/2004 6:05:00 PM

536

The Yale Law Journal

[Vol. 114: 535

1. Copyright’s Other Speech-Protective Limits......................... 553 2. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court keyed the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech, under the first amendment. In finalizing the conviction of a man accused with disturbing the peace by handing out provocative flyers to draftees of the war, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that in certain ways, words can create a “clear and present danger” in a way that Congress may constitutionally disallow. While the decision has since been overturned, Schenck is still a major point in creating context-based balancing tests used in reviewing Freedom of Speech challenges.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Common law crimes are made by judges and statutory crimes are made by legislature. Most jurisdictions have moved away from common law to statutory crimes. Many crimes are both common law and statutory. Common-law crimes create problems…

    • 1491 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This Article is brought to you by Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the…

    • 8287 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the act itself had noble intentions of preserving the right of copyright holders the terminology used to describe and detail it led to fears of infringement of the first amendment, the right of free speech. The american public out-lashed at the potential loss of their first amendment rights, and so the bill was not passed. Still, the government’s intention was to preserve the safety of individual’s intellectual property, their means simply managed to go farther than the public was willing. Thus we can see a delicate and hard to maintain stability between protecting people’s rights, and ensuring their…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are instances when freedom of speech is impaired, even though it is a constitutional right given to all Americans. This fundamental freedom is abridged when someone is bound by ludicrous Non-Disclosure Agreements, or NDA’s, on college campuses by enforcement, and in some forms by social media. According to Joanna Vamvaka, a speech writer, states, “In that sense, fundamental right to free speech serves as limitation to its own limitation” (Vamvaka 1).…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bibliography: Dames, K. Matthew. "Understanding Plagiarism and How It Differs From Copyright Infringement." Computers In Libraries 27.6 (2007): 24-27. Professional Development Collection. Web. 8 Mar. 2012.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    MacKinnon’s push for the removal of the right to free speech is not only reckless, but extremely dangerous. As an American, MacKinnon fails to recognise that it is a fundamental democratic right recognized in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and that freedom of speech is far too precious a protection to be eliminated. She attempts to justify her arguments by using the example of protecting pornography. This poor argument to such an important right in the US does not represent it in its full scope. The First Amendment ensures that speech ensures that every person has the opportunity to express their views.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Freedom for the Thought that we Hate, author Anthony Lewis takes a simply phrased law, the First Amendment and shows how complex freedom of speech really is once put into the real world of freedom, as we know it. He shows through his rejections of absolutism, strong support towards freedom restriction, and objective analysis of Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, that the United States press is unlike any other in the world.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lewis does not offer us a sketch of the development of the First Amendment – having already done that in an earlier book called “Make No Law” – but what he does is to build upon the various instances revolving around the issue of free speech that has occurred in the country. Weaving through a network of polemics and controversies regarding hate speech and offensive speech, Lewis pays tribute to the judiciary of the country for standing strong against the potential destruction of the First Amendment. Lewis has once more shown his mettle and his mastery – he is truly a great thinker of his…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fair Use Of Photographs

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Reasonable utilization may not be what you anticipate. Whether you are inside the verges of reasonable utilize hinges on upon the truths of your specific circumstance. What precisely would you say you are utilizing? How generally would you say you are offering the materials? Is it true that you are limiting your work to the philanthropic environment of the college? To figure out if you are inside reasonable utilize, the law calls for an equalized requisition of these four components: the reason and character of the use, incorporating if such utilize is of a business nature or is for not-for-profit instructive purposes; the way of the copyrighted work; the sum and considerable of the bit utilized within connection to the copyrighted act overall; and the impact of the utilization upon the potential market for or esteem of the copyrighted work. These four elements come specifically from the reasonable utilization procurement, Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act, and they have been analyzed and improved in court decisions. The accompanying synopses illustrate the noteworthiness of the components as they identify with numerous school needs. The reasonable utilization statute itself shows that charitable instructive reasons for existing are by and large supported over business employments. Furthermore, the statute expressly records some reasons particularly fitting for reasonable utilize, for example, feedback, remark, news reporting, showing, grant, or exploration. These exercises are additionally regular and essential at the college. Anyhow be watchful: Not all not-for-profit instructive utilization is "reasonable." A finding of reasonable utilize relies on upon a provision of every one of the four variables, not just the reason. Be that as it may, constraining your reason to some of these exercises will be a paramount part of guaranteeing reasonable use. Courts likewise support utilizes that are enlightening, or that are not only…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lake, Alison. “The free speech dilemma in the digital age and post-9-11 era.” The Atlantic…

    • 2726 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Florida State University Law Review, Summer (2006), Vol. 33, Issue 4, 1239-1248, Retrieved February 14, 2013, from http://www.heinonline.org.lib.kaplan.edu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/flsulr33&div=61…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics