Factory Farming Effects
The Lasting Effects of Factory Farming
Undercover investigations of factory farms brings a light to what is being kept behind closed doors for a company’s profit and gain at the expense of severely abused animals and harmful environmental factors. As reported by an article from The Washington Post, harmful antibiotics are used in everyday life of the factory farmers to make their jobs easier and the food cheaper on the market. These antibiotics cause damage not only to the environment and the animals, but to the consumer’s health as well. With the exposure of animal cruelty in factory farming, as well as threats to human health and the environment, why does the federal government allow this practice to continue?
According to the ASPCA website, …show more content…
Those who are unaware of the issues that factory farmed foods present to their health and to the environment may argue that there is no difference between meat from a happy cow raised in a large grassland and meat from a cow in a factory. They may even state that these animals are treated fairly and are better off in these factories with farmers to take care of them before they are used for their meat and milk. That, in these farms, the well-being of the animals is a priority to the farmers who raise them. They are better off in the factories than free in nature where they could be harmed. Some may even state that they have more of a risk to infectious diseases when they are walking around free in nature. Others, who simply do not care about the mistreatment or are ignorant to that issue may argue that the farmers have the right to their working freedom- however they may choose to go about it. This is their job and way of income for their families, which they are dependent on. Therefore, they need to continue these practices in order to stay financially stable. Nevertheless, factory farming is not considered illegal by the federal government so why should the farmers put a halt to their methods? The government even, in some cases, provides relief to the farmers while funding large companies who partake in methods of factory farming. A final argument that one may have against banishing …show more content…
Though some have prevailed, many have failed, and this is because there are no specific laws that forbid certain animal farm practices, such as beak removal of chickens. This allows for corporate moguls to walk away usually penalty-free, even if their ethics are called to question. With the environmental impacts becoming more and more apparent, however, more people around the globe are beginning to realize that a change must be made, and perhaps will universally come to the conclusion that the end to factory farms are, in fact,
Undercover investigations of factory farms brings a light to what is being kept behind closed doors for a company’s profit and gain at the expense of severely abused animals and harmful environmental factors. As reported by an article from The Washington Post, harmful antibiotics are used in everyday life of the factory farmers to make their jobs easier and the food cheaper on the market. These antibiotics cause damage not only to the environment and the animals, but to the consumer’s health as well. With the exposure of animal cruelty in factory farming, as well as threats to human health and the environment, why does the federal government allow this practice to continue?
According to the ASPCA website, …show more content…
Those who are unaware of the issues that factory farmed foods present to their health and to the environment may argue that there is no difference between meat from a happy cow raised in a large grassland and meat from a cow in a factory. They may even state that these animals are treated fairly and are better off in these factories with farmers to take care of them before they are used for their meat and milk. That, in these farms, the well-being of the animals is a priority to the farmers who raise them. They are better off in the factories than free in nature where they could be harmed. Some may even state that they have more of a risk to infectious diseases when they are walking around free in nature. Others, who simply do not care about the mistreatment or are ignorant to that issue may argue that the farmers have the right to their working freedom- however they may choose to go about it. This is their job and way of income for their families, which they are dependent on. Therefore, they need to continue these practices in order to stay financially stable. Nevertheless, factory farming is not considered illegal by the federal government so why should the farmers put a halt to their methods? The government even, in some cases, provides relief to the farmers while funding large companies who partake in methods of factory farming. A final argument that one may have against banishing …show more content…
Though some have prevailed, many have failed, and this is because there are no specific laws that forbid certain animal farm practices, such as beak removal of chickens. This allows for corporate moguls to walk away usually penalty-free, even if their ethics are called to question. With the environmental impacts becoming more and more apparent, however, more people around the globe are beginning to realize that a change must be made, and perhaps will universally come to the conclusion that the end to factory farms are, in fact,