Preview

An eye for an eye and soon the world will be blind (Gandhi)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An eye for an eye and soon the world will be blind (Gandhi)
English Essay

Argumentative

An eye for an eye and soon the world will be blind

(Gandhi)

These famous words as said by Gandhi reflect my view on war in general.

I do believe in justice, which means that if you do injustice to someone else you should be liable for it and be punished accordingly. This does not mean thou that a person should be punished in exactly the same way you were hurt in. It is only human to have the urge to do that.

What Gandhi means, is that if you go by the saying " tit for tat " nobody will be left alive in the long run. This may sound ridiculous but if you want to be highly analytical and get to a statistical equation, it is actually possible. All it takes to make this happen is a world where everyone is fetup with each other and where everyone wants it his own way.

To prove my point is actually very easy. If Hermanus High school is divided into two groups and they operate on the basis of gangsterism, you have a foolproof recipe for eradication of the Hermanus High school learners and most probably the teachers as well. Even if this may be questioned by the most doubtful amongst us and this will hopefully be only a hypothetical theory, one must never misjudge the fury of people to whom an injustice has been done. It is not without reason that one of the most well known sayings goes like this:

Hell hath no fury like a women scorned

It is only human to want revenge on equal bases, but when you are personally involved you will always overreact. This is why the war in Ireland will never come to an end. If an innocent offspring of a protestant hears about the injustice that has been done to his ancestors who was killed innocently, it is just common knowledge that in a moment of unreasonable rage he will kill an innocent Irishman. So, Gandhi was spot on with his prediction and his plea for peace.

I will not stop preaching peace; even thou it is unfair, it is better that the most honorable war

(Cicero)

Nobody should ever try to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    That just the strong could effectively depend on peaceful means as a device to challenge the current business as usual or to adjust the disequilibrium that penetrates the social and the political fabrics of human attempts. Composing on peacefulness resistance, Ravinda Kumar declares that peaceful noncooperation is a "capable, respectable, commendable and successful technique or intends to accord meet equity and flexibility" To Kumar, the Gandhian system for peaceful activity worries about all individuals, important, viable and kind. Kumar contends that peaceful activities are consolidated in them with "soaked up profound quality and morals". That a resort to peaceful procedures to determine clashes in the public arena exhibits unreasonable respectability by the person who hones it, and along these lines it additionally highlights practicability and validity. Citing Martin Luther King in his work, Kumar composed that "the strategies for peaceful resistance are the most intense weapon accessible to the general population in their battle for equity and human pride. In a genuine sense, Mahatma Gandhi typified in his life certain general rule that are intrinsic in the ethical structure of the universe. These standards are as unpreventable as the law of attractive energy". Additionally Kokila Shan contends that since…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “An eye for an eye, makes the whole world blind” -Ghandi. Every human has an innate desire to seek vengeance when they or their loved ones are victimized. Justice can be achieved, however, without resorting to vengeance and cruelty.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All it takes is one act of courage and act of caring. There is no important thing in life that people can achieve overnight. Gandhi explains that the force is destructive: “Violence like water, when it has an outlet, rushes forward furiously with an overwhelming force.” Violence leads people to more violence and destroys the moral laws of human beings. Violence leads people to commend the murder, injury, and other crimes which are against humanity. It is also the main cause of conflict within families, societies, and whole nations. Therefore, Gandhi’s writing on non- violence is only the path to change the violent into peaceful and progressive human beings.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    more disciplined and orderly nation than violence could ever lead to. Violence creates chaos and…

    • 2937 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi once said, “Nonviolence is not a garment to be put on and off at will. Its seat is in the heart, and it must be an inseparable part of our being.” Gandhi dedicated his life to a role of non-violence amidst times of hate, war, and even bigotry. He was at the forefront on India’s quest for freedom from Britain during the mid 1900’s. Gandhi led hundreds of thousands of Indians into civil disobedience against the British, however; he believed the most important thing was that Indians avoided all types of violence and hatred in their quest for freedom. His belief in a form of non-violence influenced many during and after his life ended in 1948. Two of the individuals it had the biggest impact on were Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Aung San Suu Kyi. King displayed forms of non-violence during the Civil Rights movement in the mid 1900’s, while Aung San Suu Kyi used politics and a belief in democracy to non-violently express her views. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Aung San Suu Kyi each followed Gandhi’s form of non-violence throughout their lives, while King used, “Nonviolent campaigns aimed at ending racial segregation across the South” (King 202), Aung San Suu Kyi peacefully “ Used democracy to reverse the process of decline” (San Suu Kyi 222).…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do believed the fact that punishment is only unjustified if and only if the accused has a reliable and worthy excuse, such that it demonstrates the innocence for what they did. For instance,…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 30, 1948, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was assassinated by Nathuram Godse. As Godse walks up to Gandhi, he shoots him three times in the chest from three feet away (Trumball 1). As “the strongest influence for peace in India that this generation has known,” Gandhi did not deserve to be assassinated despite the beliefs of Godse (Trumball 1). Gandhi’s main goal was always to gain independence for India; to do this he undertook 17 fasts (Smith 2). The assassination of Mahatma Gandhi was unjust because he was a nonviolent world leader and he helped promote peace between different religious groups within India; however, others may believe that he was to blame for the separation of India.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gandhi believed the violence was not an appropriate solution because starting war could make the whole world blind by one hit which keeps on going until everyone is dead.Gandhi is explaining violence in quote "make the whole world blind" which meanings one little thing could cause something that won't stop until the effect is ended…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel as if someone kidnap’s a child and kills the innocent child. Then yes indeed whomever the killer is should have to deal with the consequences of feeling the pain they felt. I so much believe in an eye for an eye, which has been around since centuries it is also in the bible. Back then they believed in an eye for an eye very strong welled. “The innocent was being executed but not anymore. With the implementation of DNA, many of the innocent have been freed from the death penalty. Also, the Supreme Court…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is not fair for an individual to inflict pain and harm on another, threaten their safety, invade their space, and in some cases take a life, and remain free or receive punishment that does not fit the crime committed. However, criminals should and do have to pay for their actions, just or unjust. In line with the criminal justice system, a person commits a crime, and an…

    • 2422 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gandhi and Nonviolence

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gandhi maintained certain practices that were considered essential Satyagraha practices, which he believed would bring nonviolence to the world. He named this power Satyagraha which means “reality force or holding onto truth.” Gandhi had said, “ The Truth is far more powerful than any weapon of mass destruction.” In the clear view of violence, Gandhi had come the realization that nonviolence was greater to violence itself. Gandhi believed in eleven practices that would help maintain the world in the aspect of having nonviolence throughout it. For Gandhi, ahimsa (nonviolence) was a fundamental part of his teachings, and he believed nonviolence gave a pronounced moral power to its followers. Gandhi became a guiding force behind a strong nationalist movement that encouraged independence from Great Britain, but without using force or any acts of violence. One of Gandhi’s practices was to fast, and he did this because he believed it would put an end to conflict and neglect that him and his people were enduring. During his campaigns he would fast in the hopes of making a statement and to put an end to the mistreatment of his people. Gandhi would simply stop eating until someone gave in at the point of the issue. Gandhi believe with his fasting it would encourage his followers to put more pressure on the British, and the outcome will show his triumph of him and his followers. Another practice that Gandhi introduced was the use of the spinning wheel in his village in India. He believed that spinning his own clothes would bring him self-sufficiency and prepare for forthcoming self-government. Gandhi and his people would own their own cotton and begin to weave it themselves so the British cloth would become not needed in their lives. Gandhi also believed in no harm to humans, but also no harm in animals. As a child Gandhi did eat meat, but later on in his life he preformed one of his practices of vegetarianism. Gandhi knew that…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gandhi Quotes

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe this quote means, in other words that "I will do what I believe to be right, no matter what" this is how I would interpret it. A tyrant is something or someone that dictates and oppresses one’s life, which means that the still small voice within is the negativity taking against your desires and inner wishes. I chose this quote because I think it is best to listen to the positivity that comes from within and listen to what your dreams and desires say and also live by desire and not by fear. Some adjectives that I could draw from this quote that would best describe Gandhi would be passionate and wise, because he is very knowledgeable and this quote may have many other interpretations. Gandhi may have related this quote into his life when he was fighting over the injustices of the British and this may have been the time during which he said this inspiring quote. There were many events happing that maybe this quote was meant to be about the British because in some ways they tried to control or dictate people as Hitler did too. Gandhi might have been trying to tell people to follow their inner self and stand up and not let anyone control them.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our legal system, we have five philosophies of punishment. The first one is retribution. This is the one that is commonly confused with revenge. The one we “feel”. It dates back to the Biblical times of an “eye for an eye,…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept of justice can mean something a little different to everyone, but it conveys a sense that when a person is wronged by another they will receive some type of recompose in either the person being punished; they received their item back or other compensation that fulfills the feeling of being wronged. According to Nidich, R., Nidich, S. and Alexander (2005):…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There was also a similar recognition of the violent nature of colonisation and the colonisers. (Gandhi, 1909) However, instead of focusing on violence in his work, as Fanon did, he turned to the complete antithesis of it: ahimsa, or non-violence. This may have been in part due to Gandhi’s pacifist religious upbringing, which had a strong influence in his later life.(history.co.uk, 2013.). Another possible factor was in the colonial paradigm in India, where Gandhi was recognised for his life’s work in decolonizing her. British involvement in India began with the intent of commerce through the East India Company. It became so lucrative to the British Empire that the revenue from trade, and subsequently taxation, was “approaching that of Britain itself”(Marshall, 1996). Therefore, it can be argued that the primary reason for the colonisation of India was to secure Britain’s economic interests. This was recognised by Gandhi, who wrote to the Viceroy of India that “If the British commerce with India is purified of greed, you will have no difficulty in recognising our independence”(Khipple, 1947). Thus, it may have appeared to Gandhi that if India stopped becoming profitable for the British, which was possible through non-violent civil disobedience, they may be…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays