Preview

extra

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
extra
The Agreement Bias in Negotiation: Teams Facilitate Impasse

Taya R. Cohen (Northwestern University)
Geoffrey J. Leonardelli (University of Toronto)
Leigh L. Thompson (Northwestern University)

Paper Presented at the
23rd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference
Boston, Massachusetts
June 24 – 27, 2010

Abstract:
This research represents the first empirical investigation of the agreement bias in negotiation.
The agreement bias is a negotiation trap characterized by settling for terms that are worse than one’s alternatives. Results from two experiments indicated that teams reduce the agreement bias by facilitating impasse in negotiations with a negative bargaining zone. Study 1 found that the addition of a single teammate was sufficient for generating discontinuity between teams and solos in their ability to avoid the agreement bias. Study 2 provided support for two proposed explanations for the agreement bias. Consistent with the faulty-judgment explanation, the role that required the most information processing benefited the most from the addition of a teammate. Consistent with the concern-with-being-liked explanation, solos were perceived as exhibiting more agreeable behavior than teams, and agreeable behavior was associated with a greater likelihood of agreement.

AGREEMENT BIAS

1

The Agreement Bias in Negotiation: Teams Facilitate Impasse

Abstract
This research represents the first empirical investigation of the agreement bias in negotiation.
The agreement bias is a negotiation trap characterized by settling for terms that are worse than one’s alternatives. Results from two experiments indicated that teams reduce the agreement bias by facilitating impasse in negotiations with a negative bargaining zone. Study 1 found that the addition of a single teammate was sufficient for generating discontinuity between teams and solos in their ability to avoid the agreement bias. Study 2 provided support for



References: Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human-motivation Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (Third ed.) Cohen, T. R., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence 32(11), 1559-1572. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291673 Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Penguin. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517-539. Howard, E. S., Gardner, W. L., & Thompson, L. (2007). The role of the self-concept and the social context in determining the behavior of power holders: Self-construal in intergroup Insko, C. A., Drenan, S., Solomon, M. R., Smith, R. H., & Wade, J. (1983). Conformity as a function of the consistency of positive self-evaluation with being liked and being right. Karp, R., Tan, M., Gold, D., Clarkson, A., Cramer, P., Stone, D., et al. (2008). Bullard Houses. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Kern, M. C., & Chugh, D. (2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20(3), 378-384. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L. (2006). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size (1985). Competition and cooperation between groups and between individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 301–320. McGlynn, R. P., Harding, D. J., & Cottle, J. L. (2009). Individual-group discontinuity in groupindividual interactions: Does size matter? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 129-143. Morgan, P. M., & Tindale, R. S. (2002). Group vs individual performance in mixed-motive situations: Exploring an inconsistency O 'Connor, K. M., & Arnold, J. A. (2001). Distributive spirals: Negotiation impasses and the moderating role of disputant self-efficacy Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers Polzer, J. T. (1996). Intergroup negotiations: The effects of negotiating teams. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(4), 678-698 Roth, A. E. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economic (pp Thompson, L. L. (2009). The mind and heart of the negotiator (Fourth ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Thompson, L. L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 98-123. Thompson, L. L., & Hrebec, D. (1996). Lose-lose agreements in interdependent decision making Thompson, L. L., Peterson, E., & Brodt, S. E. (1996). Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Gaertner, L. (2002). Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bazerman, M. H. & Neale, M. A. (1992). The irrational escalation of commitment. Chapter 2 of Negotiating Rationally. New York: Free Press.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2007). Negotiation: readings exercises, and cases…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Research Report

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.…

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Man

    • 4782 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Shell , R. G. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People 2nd Edition (2nd ed.). New York City, NY: The Penguin Group.…

    • 4782 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alpha-Beta Exercise Hr595

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our objectives and interests as a group were to behave collectively, formally, patiently, indirectly, unemotionally and passively. These goals conflicted with the other party’s position because they were the very opposite of those traits. Our opponents were rude, impatient, demanding, crude, Machiavellian, direct and emotional. The other party was interested in settling as quickly as possible and on their terms. We did not attempt to interject objective standards; we attempted to remain patient and indirect. Both parties were prepared prior to negotiation to address specific issues. Beta’s strategy was not to go into the negotiation and immediately deal with the issues at hand, but to be patient and ensure that the…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my experience as a psychological therapist and attorney, individuals who are resistant to compromise do not need more pressure to compromise, but instead more support for their resistance. The use of compromise is a common solution to resolving disagreements in negotiation and discussion processes. While it may produce an agreement, compromise does not always resolve problems that contain underlying interpersonal or organizational conflict. This is because compromise is frequently a "settled" resolution to a problem and not typically the optimal solution sought by either party. It may generate a functional or material solution but not resolve emotional or behavioural issues associated with the disagreement. As a result one or both parties in the dispute may continue to harbour ill feelings or other dissatisfaction that can surface again if the parties continue to have contact with each other.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosier, R. A. & Schwenk, C.R. (1990). Agreement and thinking alike: Ingredients for poor decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 69-74.…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goup Influence on Self

    • 3634 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Morris, W. & Miller, R. (1975). The effects of census-breaking and census-pre-empting partners of reduction in conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 215-223.…

    • 3634 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High Noon at Alpha Mill

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fisher, R. & Ury, W., with B. Batton (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Senkaku Island Dispute

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    UNDERLYING INTERESTS ARISING FROM THE SUBSTANCES OF THE NEGOTIATION / POSSIBLE ROOTS CAUSES THE PROBLEMS AND NEGOTIATION SOLUTIONS…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Honesty in Negotiation

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Further author discusses other unacceptable forms of influences that are broadly used in bargaining, but proofed by multiple research groups to influence human perception and decision-making skills National Center for Biotechnology Information unacceptable and shouldn’t be used in negotiation. In addition, scarcity, as a form of influence where final decision is affected by impression about the scarcity of the resource, should also be prohibited in negotiation. I believe practice of such forms of influences should be considered manipulations and unacceptable in bargaining. The only time when such forms of influence can be acceptable is when they happen naturally, and not planned in advance as part of negotiating strategy. In addition, people should know in advance and be aware of the presence of natural forms of influences, so they can base their decisions accordingly and independently from those influences. As a result, the main…

    • 803 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emotions in Negotiations

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * In some negotiations, relationship preservation is the overarching negotiation goal, and parties may make concessions on substantive issues to preserve or enhance the relationship. A potential resolution to the “person is the problem” negotiation is…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The single biggest danger in negotiation is not failure but to be successful without knowing why you are successful. -Jens Thang…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wto and vietnam

    • 17735 Words
    • 78 Pages

    As Odell (2000) argues, the strategies used in the negotiation process matter as much as…

    • 17735 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Good Essays